For those who didn't view the video Koondense provided a link to (very educational and entertaining), you have Neil deGrass Tyson, arguably the world's most famous astrophysicist, stating that the gravitational effect of the pillow you sleep on has about a trillion times more gravitational effect on your head than the moon does, because of its proximity - largely due to the inverse squared decrease in gravitational force over distance ( a similar decrease in strength over distance that light has, something we growers are very familiar with)
For those who didn't dig into the link Koondense provided, it is a Is a Recent (Agronomy 2020, 10(7), 955), Peer-Reviewed article on this subject, authored by 4 professors at the University of Vallencia.
What Has Been Thought and Taught on the Lunar Influence on Plants in Agriculture? Perspective from Physics and Biology:
The article is very detailed, referencing 129 other articles, and explaining in depth much of the details on this topic.
Here is the abstract:
"This paper reviews the beliefs which drive some agricultural sectors to consider the lunar influence as either a stress or a beneficial factor when it comes to organizing their tasks. To address the link between lunar phases and agriculture from a scientific perspective, we conducted a review of textbooks and monographs used to teach agronomy, botany, horticulture and plant physiology; we also consider the physics that address the effects of the Moon on our planet. Finally, we review the scientific literature on plant development, specifically searching for any direct or indirect reference to the influence of the Moon on plant physiology. We found that there is no reliable, science-based evidence for any relationship between lunar phases and plant physiology in any plant–science related textbooks or peer-reviewed journal articles justifying agricultural practices conditioned by the Moon. Nor does evidence from the field of physics support a causal relationship between lunar forces and plant responses. Therefore, popular agricultural practices that are tied to lunar phases have no scientific backing. We strongly encourage teachers involved in plant sciences education to objectively address pseudo-scientific ideas and promote critical thinking."
Here is the conclusion:
"Science has widely established different evidences: (i) the Moon’s gravity on the Earth cannot have any effect on the life cycle of plants due to the fact that it is 3.3 × 10?5 ms?2, almost 300,000 times lower that the Earth’s gravity; (ii) since all the oceans are communicated and we can consider their size being the size of the Earth, the Moon’s influence on the tides is 10?6 ms?2, but for a 2 m height plant such value is 3 × 10?13 ms?2 and, therefore, completely imperceptible; (iii) the Moon’s illuminance cannot have any effect on plant life since it is, at best, 128,000 times lower than the minimum of sunlight on an average day; (iv) the rest of possible effects of the Moon on the Earth (e.g., magnetic field, polarization of light) are non-existent.
The logical consequence of such evidence is that none of these effects appear in physics and biology reference handbooks. However, many of these beliefs are deeply ingrained in both agricultural traditions and collective imagery. This shows that more research should be undertaken on the possible effects observed on plants and assigned to the Moon by the popular belief, addressing their causes, if any. It would also be interesting to address these issues in both compulsory education and formal higher agricultural education in order to address pseudo-scientific ideas and promote critical thinking."
Enjoy!
Yeah they conducted a review of textbooks instead of surfing sailing felling timber or growing plants for decades. Super impressed lol. Never said hippies were not out of control they most certainly are. Ok then let us disassemble what is left.