What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Owning guns and growing .......

Status
Not open for further replies.

TwoOhSix!

Member
DrBudGreengenes said:
Only drawback to that is when fire it you better be able to explain Where and Why...it drops several hundred micro-chips when it is deployed....CSI has a reader to find them and they ID back to you
You can get ones that don't record when its deployed and are untraceable. Mostly police models have the micro chip - they cant go asking every person who fires a taser why he shot it...you could be practicing for all they know.
 

texasluv

Member
TwoOhSix! said:
You can get ones that don't record when its deployed and are untraceable. Mostly police models have the micro chip - they cant go asking every person who fires a taser why he shot it...you could be practicing for all they know.

No, you cant. Taser International is the only company with the rights and patent to produce the cartridges to their M18, M18L, and X26 models. No matter where you buy the cartridges from you need to provide your DL # and a bunch of other info, and each cartridge is serialized. When they go off they leave hundreds of little microchips (which they refer to as confetti) with the cartridge serial #. As for the new Taser C2 personal defense tasers, they may not have the confetti, but they aren't as powerful as the M18 or X26 models.

I personally have the police issue X26 taser with the laser, costs $800! Awesome little toy, but that's all it is. When there are multiple threats its kind of useless. Also, it is becoming more and more common for violent criminals to wear bullet-proof vests during the comission of a crime. Vest or not, a bullet will drop someone, the taser won't. I let my friend (an ex-USMC scout sniper) shoot me with the X26 and video record it on his phone. Its pretty funny to see myself squirming like a fish out of water. Only lasts 5 seconds but man, it feels like 20 minutes. Not comfortable.

DrBud- I agree with you completely. I love this country and my state because of the awesome gun laws. There aren't too many other places in the world where I can have a collection like the one I have. I can assure you that none of my neighbors will have any problems with home invasions...

The best part about sub-machine guns is they just keep appreciating. Most aren't produced any more and the demand for them keeps going up as they become more and more rare. My $500 MAC-10 will be worth well over $2000 in the next 5 years. Transferable select fire models that sold for $300 new are already worth $5K+.
 
Last edited:

TwoOhSix!

Member
So if you have a bunch of microchips on your dining room floor... you tell them that you let your friend shoot you to see how powerful the taser was. I don't see how they can go investigate the scene every time a cartridge is fired. I can see if it was used offensively, they could go back and trace who the taser belonged to, but for home invasion? Are the police really showing up after you fire it? I hope not...
 

Verite

My little pony.. my little pony
Veteran
.. All you need is $65,000, a Class 3 weapons license and an FFL (Federal Firearms License.)

I have a class 3 license, which allows me to own full-auto weapons- like the MAC-10, AR-15 w/ select fire (which is pretty much an M4- like the marines use), M203 Grenade launcher, etc. ..

Beyond stupid considering it gives the feds the right to search your property any time they feel like it. Oops !!

.. NFA WEAPONS AND THE 4TH AMENDMENT

As to surrendering your 4th amendment (search and seizure)
rights, this is definitely true when one gets a Federal Firearms
License. The law allows the ATF to inspect your records and
inventory once every 12 months without any cause, and at any
point during the course of a bona fide criminal investigation (18
USC sec. 923(g)). They may inspect without warning during
business hours. The only modification of the above pertains to
the C&R FFL (type 03) where ATF must schedule the inspection,
(C&R FFL holders do not have business hours) and they must have
the inspection at their office nearest the C&R FFL holders
premises, if the holder so requests. ATF may look around the
licensed premises for other weapons not on your records. This
means they take the position that if your licensed premises are
your home they may search it, as part of the annual compliance
inspection. The constitutionality of the warrantless
"administrative search" of licensees provided for in the Gun
Control Act has been upheld by the US Supreme Court, see U.S. v.
Biswell, 406 U.S. 311 (1972). Biswell was partially overturned
by Congress by 1986 changes to the requirements for a warrant
under the GCA, but the administrative search provisions remain.

In addition, if one is also a SOT, ATF claims to have the
right to enter onto your business premises, during business
hours, to verify compliance with the NFA. Their regulation to
that effect is found at 27 CFR sec. 179.22. The regulation is
apparently based upon 26 USC sec. 7606:

7606. Entry of premises for examination of taxable
objects.
(a) Entry during day.
The Secretary may enter, in the daytime, any building
or place where any articles or objects subject to tax are
made, produced, or kept, so far as it may be necessary for
the purpose of examining said articles or objects.
(b) Entry at night.
When such premises are open at night, the Secretary may
enter them while so open, in the performance of his official
duties.
(c) Penalties
For penalty for refusal to permit entry or examination, see
section 7342.

http://www.recguns.com/Sources/IIF1.html
 

lemonade

Active member
Veteran
Silly--Silly Man.....
Lets think about this in a "Real World "situation.....
Let's Just say that "Patrick" and I are Neighbors......
I just happen to get home before you today.....
I let my dog out....funny thing your Dog does not bark at us like he has since he was a puppy.....I look over the fence....to see your Big Beatiful Rotty DEAD by the Garage door.
Now I can see 3 strange Trucks in your yard.....and thru the Picture window I see your Wife and two daughters and 7 guys that are not there to "Dance" at this point .......

In your world....I go over and get my ASS kicked after I call the Cops...to protect your family until help arrives?

In my world....Myself and my three Dogs that know your wife and Daughters....Kick in your front door (sorry bout the door) Packin' My AK-74(thats not a typo) with 2-40 round clips...and dump 5-7 rounds into the floor and order everyone to the ground....taking control of a BAD situation....while on the Phone to 911.....
I'll go to JAIL for the right to do that anyday

"Better to be Judged by 12......Than Carried by 6"[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR]

I hope that was meant as comedy.

Sounds like someones been watching too many movies.

The chance of this scenario unfolding the way you describe is probably a million to one.

Suppose 7 assailants have in fact forced their way into your neighbours house. What are the chances that none of them will be armed?

What are the chances they (if theres 7 at least one will be on the lookout) wont notice you approach with a pact of dogs and an assault rifle?

What if they see you approaching and open fire on you. Now your in the open taking shots, but you can't return fire because the assailants are covered by the people you are trying to protect.

Even if they aren't armed, what if (again) they see you approaching, grab a knife from the kitchen counter (which they would have done once they gained entry) and hold it to your neighbours throat telling you to hand over the weapon?

Bottom line is trying to take control of a situation when your outnumbered seven to one is foolish no matter what weaponry you have, and will most likely just escalate the situation. This is common sense...

IMO anyone who thinks they "need" full-auto weapons:

A: Has pissed off a lot of the wrong people,

Or

B: Is totally paranoid and out of touch with reality.

Yes firearms are fun to look at and play with but when its gets the point where you think you "need" at all times or else your don't feel "safe" you really need to evaluate your situation...And sanity.
 

The_Leader

Non-Hilocentric
1 plant + 1 gun = 1O years Fed time. That means all 5O states and common wealths.


No guns here. No dogs. No worries.

Leo here are fed regularly. I grew up w/most my local cops. Age hasn't made them smarter:) I'm 4O. Their still numbnut jocks, but fat and slow now....lol
 

texasluv

Member
Verite said:
Beyond stupid considering it gives the feds the right to search your property any time they feel like it. Oops !!

I am well aware of this- I mentioned it earlier in this thread and is one of the main reasons I started this thread. I want to know how others deal with legally owning guns. It's why I only keep my sidearm at my house, the rest are in a storage room not registered to me, in a 3-hr fire-rated gun safe. I'm not worried about them coming to my place of residence. They can come all they want- they'll find less than an oz and a few pipes at any given point, and those are stored away in a false wall.

lemonade- The above scenario is not that unheard of. Just a few days ago I saw a newsclip where 4 or 5 armed men forced their way into a house and tried to rob the place. The owner of the home shot one of the invaders, and held the rest at gunpoint until authorities arrived. Wouldn't be much different if the neighbor would have come over to save the day.

I'm sorry, but it may be a one in a million chance, but it is still a chance. Just like getting attacked by a shark, or hit by lightning, or winning the lotto. Someone eventually ends up being that one in a million and if it happens to me, I will be prepared. I'd rather be prepared and not need it, then need it and be unprepared.

As for disarming a group of armed men, most people that carry guns to commit crime use them for intimidation, they usually wont use them. Also, if someone is committing a felony by endangering the life of another, I have the right to shoot them. I don't know about others but someone breaks into a house with a weapon that is giving me 100% right to shoot them dead, no questions asked. In the home invasion situation listed before I'd walk in and shoot the first "bad guy" I saw and hold the rest at gunpoint. If I saw so much as one of them turn towards me with a weapon, they'd be next to leave in a black bag. Most humans that are even slightly coherent will not continue what it is they are doing if bullets come flying at them.

Obviously if a home invasion or other life-threatening event happens there isn't time to get all "suited up", but my Interceptor vest (USMC issue- from Iraq) is in the closet by the front door. If I have to run outside and protect my family, property, neighbors, etc. I can have a gun and be suited up in a vest that can take 10 direct hits from an AK-47 within 15-20 seconds. I'm not afraid to walk into a situation where bullets are coming my way, trust me, it can't be much worse than the 'sandbox.' Anyone that's ever been there understands.
 

The_Leader

Non-Hilocentric
texasluv....your 1 gun + 1 plant = 1O yrs FED time!! No matter what Texas laws are.


I aim high, and w/arrows:) Why would you bother aimming anywhere but the head? Just asking.
 

m@rg

go on .. pull my finger
ICMag Donor
Veteran
No guns in my house

She will do me just fine

25 wks old
 
J

jipedestran

texasluv said:
I am well aware of this- I mentioned it earlier in this thread and is one of the main reasons I started this thread. I want to know how others deal with legally owning guns. It's why I only keep my sidearm at my house, the rest are in a storage room not registered to me, in a 3-hr fire-rated gun safe. I'm not worried about them coming to my place of residence. They can come all they want- they'll find less than an oz and a few pipes at any given point, and those are stored away in a false wall.

lemonade- The above scenario is not that unheard of. Just a few days ago I saw a newsclip where 4 or 5 armed men forced their way into a house and tried to rob the place. The owner of the home shot one of the invaders, and held the rest at gunpoint until authorities arrived. Wouldn't be much different if the neighbor would have come over to save the day.

I'm sorry, but it may be a one in a million chance, but it is still a chance. Just like getting attacked by a shark, or hit by lightning, or winning the lotto. Someone eventually ends up being that one in a million and if it happens to me, I will be prepared. I'd rather be prepared and not need it, then need it and be unprepared.

As for disarming a group of armed men, most people that carry guns to commit crime use them for intimidation, they usually wont use them. Also, if someone is committing a felony by endangering the life of another, I have the right to shoot them. I don't know about others but someone breaks into a house with a weapon that is giving me 100% right to shoot them dead, no questions asked. In the home invasion situation listed before I'd walk in and shoot the first "bad guy" I saw and hold the rest at gunpoint. If I saw so much as one of them turn towards me with a weapon, they'd be next to leave in a black bag. Most humans that are even slightly coherent will not continue what it is they are doing if bullets come flying at them.

Obviously if a home invasion or other life-threatening event happens there isn't time to get all "suited up", but my Interceptor vest (USMC issue- from Iraq) is in the closet by the front door. If I have to run outside and protect my family, property, neighbors, etc. I can have a gun and be suited up in a vest that can take 10 direct hits from an AK-47 within 15-20 seconds. I'm not afraid to walk into a situation where bullets are coming my way, trust me, it can't be much worse than the 'sandbox.' Anyone that's ever been there understands.

wow brother, no disrespect to the fact that you are a vet, but it really sounds like you would be happier back in the "sandbox"

not sure what you do to make a living, but I am sure that they have openings for mercenarys at places like Blackwater.

peace
jip
 

lc00p4

STORM-TROOPA
Veteran
why would you endanger your life over some weed? no amount of weed is worth your life. pretty sure if a crew comes in with guns, why wouldn't they use them? you can't gamble on the fact that they only use for intimidation. even if you managed to shoot a few of them, the other few would have already unloaded a parade on you. lots of dead bodies over something stupid. be careful what you do with your guns. you can't bring a gun into prison!!! start working on some shanks...
 

Grinchy

Member
guns and pot and dogs

guns and pot and dogs

It really depends on where you live what you would consider doing with guns and pot. At a grow here when it gets busted, they always include the guns in news reports but they are usually not included as a seperate charge, just as evidence that the grow was a criminal interprise. It is a law that having a firearm while in commission of a felony is another felony, class c i think. I think though that the guns and grow would have to be connected though to land the state charge like guns in the grow and by th door when you get busted. I also think a state carry permit would exempt you from having the two connected. Without wanting to tell anything that would identify me, I got pulled over with a halfer and 4 eights, spilled the weed down my center console, and had a loaded pistol in my jacket, and the state police didn't even book me, but I never got my beretta .40 back. Got all of my sentence dropped except the fine and the gun seizure, no jail, all because I seperated the issues in court. The D.A. tried to smear me in court over the gun, but I had my story tight about why I had bagged up weed and a pistol. I am sure things could change if a case went federal.


As for my house with my grow, it has a 90 pound pit/rotty/best friend that is already proven intruder deterrant, and a shotty with 8 bird shot shells. I don't want to kill anyone that breaks in, just **** their face and chest up real bad.
 

kittycrack

New member
wasn't the "PC World" magazine editor gunned down in his home over MMJ in the bay? I bet he would have had a fighting chance if (1) his son wasn't a fcuk head (2) he had a FN five-seven with the "cop killer" rounds kickin it on his hip
 

DrBudGreengenes

Well-known member
Veteran
lemonade said:
I hope that was meant as comedy.

Sounds like someones been watching too many movies.

The chance of this scenario unfolding the way you describe is probably a million to one.

Suppose 7 assailants have in fact forced their way into your neighbours house. What are the chances that none of them will be armed?

This is real life I would go into this assuming ALL were armed

What are the chances they (if theres 7 at least one will be on the lookout) wont notice you approach with a pact of dogs and an assault rifle?

Bcuz its the LAST thing they would expect

What if they see you approaching and open fire on you. Now your in the open taking shots, but you can't return fire because the assailants are covered by the people you are trying to protect.

Hey smart ass.......I've trained at "GunSite" and passed every "Good Guy Bad Guy....Shoot don't Shoot" with a 100%

Even if they aren't armed, what if (again) they see you approaching, grab a knife from the kitchen counter (which they would have done once they gained entry) and hold it to your neighbours throat telling you to hand over the weapon?


See above....my dogs are trained also...I'm not "John Q citizen"


Bottom line is trying to take control of a situation when your outnumbered seven to one is foolish no matter what weaponry you have, and will most likely just escalate the situation. This is common sense...


This my good man is what the assault rifle was desigined for to allow 1 person to take control of a large group of people QUICKLY
IMO anyone who thinks they "need" full-auto weapons:

A: Has pissed off a lot of the wrong people,

Or

B: Is totally paranoid and out of touch with reality.

Yes firearms are fun to look at and play with but when its gets the point where you think you "need" at all times or else your don't feel "safe" you really need to evaluate your situation...And sanity.

Well lets see in the past 13 months we have have had 9-Black Bear and 3-lions in the YARD....what do you suggest we do?
 

DrBudGreengenes

Well-known member
Veteran
lc00p4 said:
why would you endanger your life over some weed? no amount of weed is worth your life. pretty sure if a crew comes in with guns, why wouldn't they use them? you can't gamble on the fact that they only use for intimidation. even if you managed to shoot a few of them, the other few would have already unloaded a parade on you. lots of dead bodies over something stupid. be careful what you do with your guns. you can't bring a gun into prison!!! start working on some shanks...

NEVER use LETHAL FORCE to defend anything exept LIFE
 

Verite

My little pony.. my little pony
Veteran
DrBudGreengenes said:
Well lets see in the past 13 months we have have had 9-Black Bear and 3-lions in the YARD....what do you suggest we do?


Same thing they did before they had guns. Build a moat.

Beaumaris_Castle_and_Moat.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top