I
istayapi
I understand that the quality of the smoke would be better with organics, What about the Yield. Does organics make a better yield than Chem nutes?
Last edited:
If people had to choose between mass produced chemcical fruits and vegetables and nutrient and taste rich organic fruits, they would choose the organics in a double blind study if price was the same.
Now in a double blind study with chemcial vs Organic cannabis,
the person may only be looking for sheer strength and onset of effects to consider what he likes is the chemical choice.
Another may be after quality of the high (not quantity), and may be inclined to smoke a bit more perhaps, as he indulges in the full complexity of cannabinoids and terpenes.
The Slickster said:Miracle grow is radioactive and the other chemicals are not too far off.
Normally:
Chemical is for people growing for quantity, potency, and ease of (non-organics).
Organic is for people growing for quality, personal uses-taste, and it too can be potent, and for ease of not using chemicals for any personal reasons.
Sometimes organic growers can dial in just as large a yield with certain parameters.
Sometimes chemical grows get less yields when things aren't "optimal".
The same holds true in reverse as well of course.
Organic growers like DJ Short or Soma are after the highest quality organic results.
Organics will assist in the areas of taste, flavour, aroma, and supporting the innoculated media with the necessary whole foods and diets that will produce the maximum amount of cannabinoids in a more natural broad range ratio that will make the effect of the herb grown organically of superior effect where strength is not 1st, but the quality of the high is of utmost importance.
With chemicals, normally the herb will be stronger. But the strength it ensues is one that is more basically founded on THC to be of potency. But with only chemical building blocks to work with, has no basis for synthesizing more complex cannabinoids and terpenes. And hence terpenoids, complexity of high, etc.
This is not to say that chemically grown buds will not produce more yield of high THC buds. But to understand that the plant makes itself out of what it is given.
When you give N-P-K and trace elements, you are growing for weight and strength.
More drugs for the body to break down and the palnt as well.
When you feed a whole diet rich in worm castings, amino acids, guanos, seaweed kelp, complete with naturally available vitamins and amino acids you are talking about a whole extra set of cannabinoidial and terpenal healing properties making it healthier.
Did I mention miracle grow is radioactive, looks like some cheap shortcut best for commercial growers who don't care about personally consuming the produce.
You can grow a fruit or vegetablewith chemicals like miracle grow. But you will not have that orange that bursts open with terpenes and flavors and all natural vitamins that reach the depth's of your human experience. If you have not tasted a good orange lately, blame the chemical companies.
Making more of a THC drug than wholistic cannabinoidial profiled plants. Organics can become complicated.
But mixing "vita-mix" into your reservoir or soil is likened to you taking vitamins instead of getting them in your diet. Would you feed your dog organics based dog food if it was not too expensive? Or would you feed it nutritionless bulking agents which are baseless nutrients and added with vitamins just to grow and not look sick?
Organics are healthier(good for you), more broad range and pleasant in effects.
Chemicals are just that, chemicals, they will grow alot of THC laden buds that would satisfy a THC seeking high or stone. But it is more on a drug chemical level by the chemcials it was fed. So you get a "chemmy" high. There are many different chemcical lines out there, some more complete than others.
Just don't start off with miracle grow is all. If you are going to do it, do it well. Make sure there are more than just chemcial NPK and chemcical trace elements.
If people had to choose between mass produced chemcical fruits and vegetables and nutrient and taste rich organic fruits, they would choose the organics in a double blind study if price was the same.
Now in a double blind study with chemcial vs Organic cannabis,
the person may only be looking for sheer strength and onset of effects to consider what he likes is the chemical choice.
Another may be after quality of the high (not quantity), and may be inclined to smoke a bit more perhaps, as he indulges in the full complexity of cannabinoids and terpenes.
Personally, organics are preferred as I like to not try and outsmart nature. The arrogance never pays off in the dividends I am looking for. As I don't sell.
Either way it all comes down to personal choice and that is not a decision anyone can make for anyone else. Personal circumstances and choices are just that, personal.
The Slickster said:The fast onset is one way of trying to explain being able to tell the difference between chemical grown and organic without taking taste into consideration as a double blind. Given there can be organic with a lot of THCV, etc. Aside from onset, which is not solely based on THC or even just THCV, you can usually tell the difference in overall effect is the meaning there along with other considerations. I use it as but one set of criteria when noting differences. Don't care who uses miracle grow, so don't take it personally or to the ego, you should just be aware of the high radioactivity. Like I said about personal tastes, if you want to smoke radioactive chemicals, that is all your choice and has not a thing to do with me as I don't use it and will not be affected whatsoever.
And I am aware that organics has the capability to produce very strong product along with a large yield given certain parameters are met as I stated before. This is of course in combination with a more complex array of cannabinoids than chemicals try to reproduce haphazardly.
I just like more natural stuff than radioactive isotopes that can cause cancer is all.
http://cannabisculture.com/news/tobacco.
"Radioactive buds?
New study shows that many fertilizers are radioactive, producing potentially harmful pot.
By David Malmo-Levine and Dana Larsen
A recent study shows that many commonly used fertilizers are high in radioactive elements. The study was performed by Dr Paul Hornby, who holds a master’s degree in biochemistry and a PhD in human pathology from the University of British Columbia.
The study analyzed 25 different types of fertilizers, eight "organic" varieties and 17 "chemical" fertilizers. The results showed that the chemical fertilizers emitted on average five times the radiation of the organic group.
There are different ways of measuring radioactivity. The table shows the "counts per minute" (CPM) of radiation detected in each sample. The average for the organic fertilizers was 140, while the chemical fertilizers had an average radiation count of 675, an almost five-fold increase.
The lowest radiation was found in the organic blood meal fertilizers, which emitted only background radiation - the normal low radiation found in most objects. On the other end of the spectrum was the 5-20-20 berry food, with a radiation level about 24 times higher than background.
These levels of radiation don’t pose a danger through simply being around bags of fertilizer. However, cannabis and other plants are known to uptake radioactive elements from their growing medium. Radiation exposure is accumulative, so that repeated inhalation would present an increasing health risk.
Radiation also accumulates in the soil. Farmers who grow chemical-fed tobacco soon face soil vitality-loss, forcing them to use more and more chemical fertilizer every year to maintain the same level of productivity. That means that tobacco land gets more and more radioactive every year.
Numerous studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine and other health, science and radiation journals have indicated that it is the radioactive elements in tobacco which lead to lung cancer (CC#35, Radioactive tobacco). Tobacco is typically fed with high-phosphate, chemical fertilizers, including heavy foliar spraying. All of these factors would produce a high-level of radioactive elements in the tobacco leaf.
Although further research is needed, this study does point the way to some simple harm-reduction techniques for pot growers. Many growers believe that using organic fertilizers produces a tastier, higher-quality bud. This study indicates that they could also be producing a less harmful product than that produced with many chemical fertilizers.
Although cannabis and cannabinoids are non-toxic, radiation is a major cause of cancer. Further research is clearly needed, but it seems likely that the best way to keep your buds as safe and harmless as possible is to use non-chemical, organic fertilizers, to eliminate any potential radioactivity getting into your stash, and your lungs.
Dr Paul Hornby is available for testing of all fertilizers: [email protected]
Fertilizer Type............................................Radioactivity score
Evergro Specialty Fertilizer..........................90
Blood Meal 12-0-0
Green Valley....................................................96
Blood Meal Fertilizer
12-0-0
RainGrow Organic Fertilizer.........................102
Bloom-A-Long
0-12-0
SeaSpray Organic Fertilizer..........................125
0.5-1.0-0.5
Green Valley Blood and Bone..........................154
Meal Fertilizer
7-11-0
RainGrow Organic Fertilizer..........................160
4-2-3
Homestead 100% Organic................................174
Bone Meal
4-14-0
DML Bird Guano...............................................178
NPK unknown
-----------------------------
Those above are all organic.
Those below are all synthetic.
-----------------------------
Miracid Soil Acidifier...................................248
Plant Food
30-10-10
Shultz All Purpose Plant Food.......................258
10-15-10
Miracle-Gro For Roses...................................285
18-24-16
Green Valley....................................................326
Rhododendron and Azalea Food
10-8-6
Shultz African Violet Plus...................................393
8-14-9
General Hydroponics..............................................400
Flora Grow
2-1-6
Miracle-Gro Water Soluble..................................409
Plant Food
15-30-15
Greenleaf Evergreen...............................................437
Tree and Hedge Feeder
13-6-7
Stern's Miracle-Gro..............................................538
For Tomatoes
18-18-21
Miracle-Gro...........................................................547
Plant Food Engrais
15-30-15
Greenleaf Shur Gro....................................................672
Soluble Plant Food
20-20-20
Greenleaf Shur Gro....................................................693
Soluble Plant Food
20-20-20
Shultz-Instant.............................................................740
Orchid Plant Food
19-31-17
Shultz Tomato Plus....................................................874
18-19-30
Evergro Fruit Tree....................................................1037
and Berry Food
4-20-20
Osmocote....................................................................2021
Time Release Fertilizer
18-6-12
Green Valley Berry Food...........................................2384
5-20-20
Like I said, don't care if you use it. Just know that it is way more radiation than you would get from tv, microwave, and the computer combined. Go ahead and use them, it will only affect you and nobody else.
minds_I said:Hello all,
Just to stir the organic shit so to speak- Have you ever had organically grown veggies? Do they not taste superior to mass produced veggies?
Just my 2 pennies and a nicle- and I rasie you a nickle.
minds_I
Ganico said:Okay, say you have two women, and both are pretty much equally attractive, right?
One is all natural, no procedures or plastic surgery.
One has had all kinds of plastic surgery done, and has possible STD's and costs a lot to take out and fills her body with all kinds of chemicals and dope.
Which one do you pick? The one with the plastic titties who may be bad for your health and who costs more to satisy? Not me. I'd pick the other one, and she also tends to smell better.
The Slickster said:I'll take the girls too. But seriously, the microwave does not have the same levels of radioactivity you refer to. So go take your multi-vitamins and miracle-gro into the "chemmy" section. People using grow boosters like superthrive and miracle grow are only trying to overcompensate in place of patience and nature, but not the kind where you say "I'm going to feed arsenic to my plants then flush them and give them to some idiots". And base your prognosis on whether they even have taste buds left.
Feeding old hippies chem buds and then telling them off helps only your ego, and does not prove 1 thing. Like I said it is subjective, nature knows best.
I'm staying with her - all natural boobs.
No fake implants!