No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning

[SPG.]

That's impossible, because, #1, god doesn't exist, and #2, if god existed by your definition, he would be a "supreme" being, and nothing could be above "him". I don't fear god anymore than the boogieman, because neither exists.
And, yes, people who post things as nonsensical as that deserve to be mocked, just as the false gods they pretend to represent deserve to be mocked.
Maybe "crack" was an inappropriate reference. Acid, shrooms, powerful psychedelics, meth, would have been more appropriate, so for that, I apologize.
How about "spaced out"? Would that be more politically correct? My "third eye" must not have been functioning properly.

^^As ive Said he is NOT TOO YOUR MIND.. too grouchy mann!.. Lol. ya aint ALWAYS gonna be like that tho!... (maybe away from the Desktop pc/laptop..dunno??)
DO NOT PRODUCE words/YOUR Opinion!.. EXCEPT..... ..Maybe/Probably[^] you ca'nt Except.. (Dunno,s'pose only excercising at the end of the day! Opinions "IS" us but ("FREE YOUR MIND QUAID" )...
Slowly draw a big circle in the air with ya finger and have a good think about that..

ANYWAY!!
what am i doing back here ... *^*&(()"£%" ..Average of 5 seconds n im insulted !

 

[StudenTeacher]

That makes no sense at all. Put down the crack pipe.

I did not take offense to this. That explanation wasn't compatible with everyone's mind, as our thought processes differ greatly here on earth. Having varying opinions and different points of view, and sharing these, is truly the only way to learn and grow. I suppose I can try to simplify, as it's truly a simple concept.

Today's science is not new. The ancients knew of the big bang. They knew a unity was so compact and dense that it almost became nothing and did not know itself. As means of survival this unity had no choice but to push outward in order to continue to exist; though this new existence would be quite different. The beauty of this is, in pushing out (exploding), new perspectives were experienced and continue to be experienced constantly. This goes far beyond 'evolution' as most are taught in school, though it is a similar concept. Many throughout time have referred to this as 'creation'.

The ancients knew that this explosion, or big bang, was the bringer of light and life to us humans and the galaxy, fore, before this there was only darkness. This light has been celebrated every since it was conceived that it existed. Once people found out, there was every reason to celebrate this, as humans consider life to be a beautiful thing. It also is a reminder of the possibilities that exist, in that something so destructive and creative may again take place and erase or discontinue the human race, and all life on the planet earth. Knowing that it could be taken away, many gain a higher appreciation of life, and thus make it more enjoyable and meaningful.

It was pretty obvious to these people that a this light was responsible for everything that we experience. Without it, nothing would exist. They conceived the idea that before this light, there must have been some force in order to push this unity outward or make it explode. This is the higher power that in reality nobody knew or understood, and this is still the case today.

Looking around and learning, and experiencing life on earth, people began to notice patterns and ratios that were similar to those of the cosmos. It was also noticed that whatever species that was to continue, for the most part needed a fertile male and a receptive female. This lead to referring to the 'force' as masculine, as it is energy/electricity/fire, being pushed outward from itself being received by the darkness of outer space. If the fire is not received, it would cease to exist, much like depriving a fire on earth of it's oxygen. Of course this points to the divine feminine force being equally as important as the masculine. Masculine and feminine attributes were given to these forces because this was very easy for people to relate to and understand, as, although in a grande way, it is similar to how plants and animals reproduce on earth. The same attributes of masculine and feminine were givin to the Sun and Earth. This is why the 'father' as 'He' is referred to is celebrated as being male. He is not a Man, and never was. No magic wands, or hocus pocus, or human like entities creating earthly worlds. No sky daddy, or sky fairy or 'God' as taught by the modern patriarchal religions, yet none the less, very powerful and meaningful.

In giving credit to these forces, light is celebrated, which eventually led to sun worship for the masculine minded and of course Earth worship for the feminine minded. Do not interpret this to be human males or females, but energies being Yin or Yang. All qualities are shared by all to some degree, though in general, some qualities (masculine or feminine) will be dominant. The patriarchal modern religions are far out of balance, celebrating the dominant masculine force after killing off the pagans that held the Earth and the feminine force in high regard.

We know that electricity travels through water and salt, especially us growers with TDS pens reading the EC of our nutrient mixes. The electricity/energy/fire in male human semen is received by the receptive mother/female and life continues on. Regardless of what the creational force is that created life for humans, we are the current 'force', as we are now the creators of human life, through sexual reproduction. If we did not do this, human life would not exist. The power of 'God' is in us and we create life in much the same way. This is reason to celebrate , and many have for thousands of years. This is also where a lot of confusion lies in regards to people celebrating sexuality in the pagan systems.

Religion (latin- religare, religio); noun: a problematical situation.
synonyms: predicament, dilemma, plight.
Verb; to tie or bond, Obligation, to hold in reverence.

The word religion means to be in awe of the ones holding people in bondage (mentally of spiritually) as an obligation. It is, and always has been forced on the masses in order to create a system of control. The religions of modern times have conquered by the sword, that should be evidence enough that they are incorrect.

Celebrating life/God/the unexplainable force has nothing to do with religion. It's just appreciation for what we have and love

Hopefully an Xian or two will read and understand more about their 'father'. If they weren't speading so much misinformation people would likely leave them be and perhaps honor their choice of worship/celebration. Its all sybolism.

"All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them" The bible states that the word of Jesus is based on symbolic stories using people as analogous forms, not to be taken literally. The gnostic teachings were closer to the truth. Christians, as most, have love in their hearts and are not to blame. We're all in it together so let's all share love and keep things positive

 

[HempKat]

Can we please avoid the sub topic of religion? There's a lot of interesting discussion going on here most of which has nothing to do with religion. I'd really hate to see the thread closed just because someone feels it necessary to substitute science with religion and vice versa. Okay I think most of us get that some here believe in God and some don't. No amount of heated discussion though is going to get anyone to change their minds one way or another.

 

[genedigger]

ive never said anyones belief is wrong.all i have stated is that i believe the theory of evolution to be dangerous because it doesnt create love only discord among those who are for it and against it.i said it already and i will again.evolution influenced hitlers view of everybody that wasnt german or aryan or white.it was a determining factor in the decisions him and his goons made.they taught the german kids in school evolution and eugenics.they hanbded out propaganda flyers about it.there were over 50,000 people in the u.s.a. who were castrated against there will from about 1900 to 1940s.this happened in our country because of eugenics which came about because of this wonderful theory that is going to make the world a much better place.

 

[DrFever]

Can we please avoid the sub topic of religion? There's a lot of interesting discussion going on here most of which has nothing to do with religion. I'd really hate to see the thread closed just because someone feels it necessary to substitute science with religion and vice versa. Okay I think most of us get that some here believe in God and some don't. No amount of heated discussion though is going to get anyone to change their minds one way or another.

Haha its all about religion when you come down to it ,,,,, from the moment the star of Bethlehem hhaha one must think that Bethlehem didn't even exist then
The stars represent the leadership of the church ???

Matthew 2:2 Saying, “Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him.”

 

[StudenTeacher]

Can we please avoid the sub topic of religion? There's a lot of interesting discussion going on here most of which has nothing to do with religion. I'd really hate to see the thread closed just because someone feels it necessary to substitute science with religion and vice versa. Okay I think most of us get that some here believe in God and some don't. No amount of heated discussion though is going to get anyone to change their minds one way or another.

God is a concept that is unique to all. You are correct in that is there is no need to debate or discuss the existence or non existence of God. On the other hand, the ones that put these religions together were very intelligent beings. They understood electromagnetism and how using your entire brain is important in strengthening ones electromagnetic field and stimulating brain waves. There is ancient science and knowledge in these holy books that gets overlooked by many because they don't see numbers or equations or physics in them. Those things exist outside of these books, and hence the balance. To contemplate creation, or the big bang, which in my opinion is what this thread is about, more than the left side of our brain will have to be used in order to make since of what happened.

From the point of view of an outsider, someone who isn't well versed in science, and who isn't religious, it's my opinion that science is cold and religion is warm. Sure there are fanatics, but speaking purely from my personal and biased point of view, most religious folks are loving and wonderful people, which constitute a huge population of the earth. For the most part the Jewish owned media has been trying to discredit religion in order to corrupt our society, as it's a great way to usher in a Marxist communist revolution/society. Religious opinions should not be discounted so long as used in the proper context which is the topic of this thread.. The scientific mind can be more distant from humanity on occasion but one thing both have in common is that they're both judgmental.

I bring up these things not to change minds or to compete with other ideas, but on the basis of sharing information. The world will be a better place when the competition ends and the collaboration begins. There are definitely people being mean to each other in this thread which of course is disheartening but information is being shared nonetheless.

The thing about religion is that it requires both belief and suspension of disbelief as well as imagination, which are all right brain attributes. Science of course is on the other side of the fence, generally not willing to participate in these mental tasks.
To understand the big bang, or creation, the hows and whys of it all, we must have a complete understanding, not a one sided point of view.

Riddle me this ; If we do scientifically discover 'how' us humans, and everything else in the universe was created, do we then move onto 'why' it was created? Or do we start with the why, and then conceptualize the how? Which one of these thought processes is more advanced or more valid? The bottom line is, when a scientist discovers this, it will of course be based on theory and there won't ever be definitive proof, as there will never be and has never been a witness to the explosion(big bang). Much of this new science is for the most part, a belief system. This is evidenced by the fact that most of us are reading about these studies and not participating in them. If we don't have first hand knowledge or understanding, and have to take someone at their word, this is a belief system. Another thing is, how will this be explained to the masses of the earth with average IQ of 100 or less? I think it sound a lot like it does now, " a force that we can't explain to you is responsible for creating all life, and the earth, and the heavens(what we see in the sky). We view this as being positive, though it's possible an opposing force may in fact destroy everything at any given time. (Satan; Hebrew: adversary. When I think adversary, opposing force comes to mind.)

However we exercise our minds, it should be in a peaceful fashion. Ideas should be more akin to a joint than a sharpened sword. Ideas are for sharing

 

[DrFever]

Student what do you mean they were intelligent beings they were only few generations from cave man status geez and there intelligent ????
In a nutshell individual humans are essentially the same, but tiny differences in our genomes interact with unique social and geographical pressures over millenia to produce vastly different cultures.
Nobel Laureates are Ashkenzi Jews, and how high their literacy rates were at a time in human history where literacy among other groups was rare.
Oral law featured prominently in Jewish faith until destruction of the Temple at Jerusalem. Without a center for teaching and study, the Rabbis began recording oral law in what became the Talmud, and Rabbinic Judaism was born.
Every Jewish male had to be literate in order to be able to study and understand Jewish law.
Here’s the kicker.
early Christianity absorbed a great number of Jewish converts who weren’t smart enough to become literate: they couldn’t cut it as Jews. They sloughed off into Judaism-lite AKA Christianity, which did not require literacy and which, as it happens, quite naturally formed itself around a pagan god who died in the fall and was reborn in the spring.
Getting rid of the dummies upped the Jews’ average IQ, and with successive generations—smarties marrying smarties—and unique social pressures, etc., has resulted in a highly cognitively successful culture.
And here all these Christians are thinking that the Mosaic law was the lesser law, and Christ brought the real deal.
We New Testament types are taught that the Jews had Religion 101 with “Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbor’s Wife”, but we have Religion 201 with “Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.”
Belief is all scaffolding anyway, so who knows? But I always wondered what Jews thought about Christians labeling them as misguided. Now I know. Apparently some of them label early Christians as stupid.
That has got to be the funniest thing I’ve heard in a long time.

 

[StudenTeacher]

Haha its all about religion when you come down to it ,,,,, from the moment the star of Bethlehem hhaha one must think that Bethlehem didn't even exist then
The stars represent the leadership of the church ???

Matthew 2:2 Saying, “Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him.”

Not necessarily religion. I like to think of it as the seed that started religion that is important. The unifying force. This plant of religion was not nurtured properly and has become putrefied as its fruit rots on the vine of our consciousness. True religion, has been subjugated and altered by the current rulers.

 

[genedigger]

how can you make the assumption that they were not intelligent?they were more intelligent in my opinion.our culture would love for you to believe they werent intelligent but if you peel through the layers of history and really look you will find out some interesting stuff about people of old.student teacher you are very correct.its almost impossible to be truly spiritual and have your third eye fully open without both sides of the brain working in unison.it is so obvious from this thread how much people use only one side of there brain.

 

[DrFever]

It seems like this should be a course on all college curricula, and an interdisciplinary field that attracts the best and brightest minds from all disciplines. Yet there is very little work being done in this field, that I can find. Here's a brief outline of what I've come up with so far.

Estimate of Risks:
Ask most knowledgable people in each field what their best estimate of the chances are from the cause they know most about. Sum chances across fields. Decide how much money it's worth spending based on risk vs. spending on other risk aversion such as air safety, nuclear regulatory agencies, military, etc.

Risk Factors:
Asteroid Impact, other Astronomical disasters
Nuclear War
Biological Warfare, Pandemic from natural causes
Nuclear or Biological Terrorism
Ecological disaster or degradation, Pollution
Climate change, natural or human generated, Vulcanism
Overpopulation? Hunger? Chaos? Resulting in Population Crash?
Advance of technology leads inevitably to more and more power being available to smaller and smaller groups of people, culminating in possible eventual ability of any human alive to destroy the planet?

Factors that Decrease Risk:
Independent Colonies dispersed throughout solar system
Increases in knowledge
Technological improvements
Defensive military technology

Disciplines:
Medicine, Epidemiology
Biology, Genetics
Astronomy, Planetary Science, Climatology
Politics/Political Theory
Military/Military Science
Economics
Study of Risks, Perceived Risks, Response to Risk
Paleontology, Geology
Agriculture
Zoology, Ecological Science (the science of ecosystems)
Religion/Theology
Education
Technology/Engineering
Physics
History, Archaeology
Psychology/Psychiatry
Thinking about this leads me to believe there are actually no disciplines that we should exclude. The questions come from most areas of human knowledge, but the answers might come from anywhere at all. I've decided we really need for people from every field of human endeavor to be thinking hard about this problem.

Concerns:
Prediction difficult
Mistakes costly

Possible Responses:
A. Disbelief / Humor / Dismissal
B. Fatalism / Despair / Suicidal Responses (i.e. "Good! We deserve to go extinct!")
C. Blind Faith
D. Informed Faith, Intelligent Decisionmaking, Action

In trying to decide what I want to be when I grow up, I kept realizing whatever field I chose wouldn't seem very important after our species goes extinct. And that eventuality is seeming more and more likely all the time. What good am I doing in making sure the engines function perfectly on the Titanic? So I decided I ought to be watching for icebergs instead, since it seems like nobody else really is. Or rather, nobody sees beyond their particular field. Hardly anyone is looking at the big picture. So I decided I ought to do that instead.

 

[StudenTeacher]

Hi Dr.Fever,
As much as it's not politically correct I tend to side with the theosophists in that, in regards to evolution, not all humans are identical beings and groups of less evolved are still among us. This is evidenced by war and hate that at times seems rampant. This was certainly the case with the ancients. Ancient stories speak of gods and humans mating, but this isn't a possibility. What is a though, is more evolved cultures mating with less evolved cultures and creating mixed offspring, thus, potentially bringing offsring up to speed so to speak. The ones that these ancient Jews mention were less evolved beings.The knowledge acquired by the Jews was not created by them, as they were also taught. Humanity teaches humanity. While some were crawling out of caves, others were more advanced.
Remember though that true Christianity came from Egypt, not the Jews, as they will have you believe. Their version of it is to enslave the goyim.

I do not speak of physical evolution which is solely what modern science focuses on. I speak of mental, spiritual, and emotional evolution. It's not just in regards to physiology. Our DNA records our mental and emotional experiences as well as our physical, which scientists will prove in the future if they haven't already. As we continue our evolutionary journey, the DNA of the future generations will communicate to humans and gradually change us into less violent, more civil beings. Humans will have have to work together to achieve a peaceful life as the earth becomes more populated, rather than battle it out all the time like we do now. This will bring humans great comfort and is essentially what evolution is about. It's about resolution; physically, mentally and emotionally.

Evolution isn't about survival of the 'Fittest' as in the most bad ass or smartest, it's about being able to adapt to a new environment or way of life. It also takes a long ass time, and likely many groups of humans from the ancient times had intelligence and intellectual capabilities that rival ours today. The rulers will have us believe that since we are supposedly 'smarter' in current times, that old ways of life are for less intelligent peoples. That basically means that whatever they say goes, because it's the newest, smartest, freshest idea, created by 'modern' humans, with 'modern', highly evolved thought processes. 'Evolution' is used by people that have a great interest in lying to us. Of course it exists, but within reason. A couple thousand years will not create new/smarter/better/ or more evolved humans on a large scale.

 

[StudenTeacher]

Hi Doc, In regards to your last post, it's my opinion that those things are being addressed but must remain hidden from most due to the sensitivities of the issues they may bring up. Most peoples minds are not ready for this kind of stuff. One of my uncles, whom I love and respect very much, will have no bother with pondering life or death or creation or science or any of the things discussed in this thread. He is 100% content with his family life and asks me 'why bother' learning so much, just enjoy life and find peace. I envy him as much as I respect him. If the world ends tomorrow he will die happy.

 

[RetroGrow]

Hi Dr.Fever,
As much as it's not politically correct I tend to side with the theosophists in that, in regards to evolution, not all humans are identical beings and groups of less evolved are still among us.

Really? Care to name those less evolved groups?

Humans will have have to work together to achieve a peaceful life as the earth becomes more populated, rather than battle it out all the time like we do now.

Seriously? Did you just post that? The reality is, as the world becomes more populated, competition for diminishing resources increases, and more, not less, wars are spawned. Someone hasn't been paying attention.

'Evolution' is used by people that have a great interest in lying to us. Of course it exists, but within reason. A couple thousand years will not create new/smarter/better/ or more evolved humans on a large scale.

Now that's funny! So, it's the evolutionists who are lying to us, not the creationists? And, in the past "couple thousand years", mankind has not become smarter? While I agree that in your case, that is true, on the whole, mankind has become MUCH smarter. We have gone from the flat earth, and the sun revolving around the earth, to landing men on the moon and putting space craft way out in the universe. We have invented science, medicine, and technology, no thanks to, and in spite of the creationists. Your post is the result of mythology, superstition, and organized ignorance. Absolutely mind numbing.

 

[StudenTeacher]

how can you make the assumption that they were not intelligent?they were more intelligent in my opinion.our culture would love for you to believe they werent intelligent but if you peel through the layers of history and really look you will find out some interesting stuff about people of old.student teacher you are very correct.its almost impossible to be truly spiritual and have your third eye fully open without both sides of the brain working in unison.it is so obvious from this thread how much people use only one side of there brain.

My third eye is not open though I've always been able to pick up vibrations from the earth. In my youth I would discount them and just chalk it up to being silly, possibly insane, etc. What type of intellectual being wants to be labeled as being nuts? Being insecure and pushed around as a child made me turn my back on my spiritual blessings/gifts because I just wanted to be normal and accepted by others. I myself wondered at times if I was potentially insane, mentally unstable, or just highly imaginative. I've come to realize, now that I've challenged and beaten most of my insecurities, that the information accessible to us is vast, but must deciphered or recognized to be of use. My clairsentience is improving, as I no longer discount it, and in time I hope to bring light to my third eye. The irony of all this is that many of my longtime friends think I'm nuts. Here in SoCal, in the OC, it's all about finances and perceived success. It's hard to find people that relate.

 

[StudenTeacher]

Hi Retro, I wanted to say thanks again for teaching me about the aspirin. I recommend it to everyone now

Yes we will learn peace as the earth becomes more populated.
Humans do not enjoy violence for the most part. It makes our stay here uncomfortable, just as too much sun might make a fair skinned person uncomfortable. In time the offspring of the fair skinned person will darken in order to bring comfort, and essentially peace will be made with the sun. Evolution is about being at peace with, or adapting to the elements, whether physically or non physically.
The flat earth was taught by scientist of the time and they knew it was a lie. It takes about 5min of reading about astrology, and history for that matter to see it was fabricated. It's part of the Columbus lie. 6000 years of astrology is evidence people knew of a spherical earth. It's the only way astrology can be correct. Yes, basic astronomy preceded astrology, and was improved upon. Many people argue that astrology has no merit as a science but fail to consider that it is based on astronomical movements.

Many evolutionary scientists, as well as creationists, are just swallowing and regurgitating whatever bullshit they've been fed. They are on opposite ends of the specrtrum. Without balance one cannot percieve or begin to understand truth. I don't advocate either of these philosophies/theories.

 

[mr.brunch]

 

[LEF]

Getting a high just reading this far out stuff.

 

[ezak420]

[FONT=&quot]Consciousness is aware of itself as an experience between itself and the environment in which it exists, it is a ‘self-awareness’ having the capacity for understanding, but.. the understanding of, and organization of, information acquired through awareness, inwardly from or outwardly from the perspective that is conscious, that understanding and organization are elements of intelligence.. intelligence, like awareness, is an inherent attribute of consciousness, and the inherent attributes of awareness and intelligence may be dormant or active without negating the experience that informs consciousness of its existence..

While it may take several readings to grasp the intended message of the previous paragraph, a more simple description will make sense based on the relationships described in the previous paragraph. There is a basic fundamental ‘substance’ of existence, the ‘stuff’.. I understand it as Energy, and it has been named so many other names, but ‘stuff’ works pretty good, too.. so this ‘stuff’ is what ALL stuff is made of, even thoughts, beliefs, ‘mind’, Space/Time, Infinity/Eternity, it’s all made of ‘stuff’.. and ‘stuff’ is Conscious <cue the freaky music>.. just because ‘stuff’ is conscious, doesn’t mean that ALL ‘stuff’ is intelligent, some is some isn’t.. the ‘stuff’ that is intelligent organizes the information revealed by experiences and awareness into understandings that reveal the relationship between any particular perspective of Consciousness and all perspectives of consciousness, individually or collectively.. what, did I imply a ‘more simple’ description? Okay, it’s all about relationships.

“In the Beginning”, there was no ‘beginning’, actually.. it seems that each successive cycle of the eternal cycle of cycles is a ‘beginning’, but.. there is a singular thread of consciousness that exists through ‘all’ cycles of ‘beginnings and conclusions’, consciousness which emerges from the chaos between cycles to again set in motion its own self-discovery.. setting itself apart from itself, that it might know itself through the experiences of relationships with itself apart from itself, see.. simple?? No? Okay.. suppose that there is One Singular Undifferentiated Consciousness (Singularity) in a sea of chaos energy.. ‘chaos energy’ repeats no patterns, and so is unexperiencable, it is just ‘potential’.. so, the Singularity’s awareness radiates into the chaos/void but returns no ‘information’, it is simply absorbed by the chaos/void.. the Singularity can only be ‘self-aware’, can only conceptualize that it ‘is’, or.. “I AM”..

Without feedback, without mirrors, or companionship, or anything other than itself to reference, the singularity is isolated in a sea of potential, a sea of chaos, the Void.. the most basic principle of existence eventually emerges from the chaos, ‘self-organization’, order emerges from chaos, it has always been thus.. but, there was nothing to ‘organize’, no ‘other’, no anything ‘other’ than itself, and its ‘self-awareness’..and yet, the principle emerges in a stunning act of intelligent curiosity, the Singularity asks THE question that is its ‘New Beginning’… “WHAT AM I”?.. to know itself, it must study itself with unconditional sincerity, without prejudice or desire.. actually, there is no such reference for ‘prejudice or desire’ by the Singularity, as no feedback informs it of such concepts.. so…

“In the Beginning”, the Singularity, a matrix of consciousness, awareness, intelligence, energy, and potential, set the Cosmos in motion with the question, “What AM I”?.. in an act of amazing beauty and courage, the curiosity to understand its own existence inspires the Singularity to abandon its ‘self’ to find itself.. it scatters itself into the void, into the chaos, with a single ‘Prime Directive’.. Go into the Void, and Experience ME in Thee, that through ‘You’, we/us/Life, collectively we will discover what it is that “I AM’, we ‘ARE’.. There are no rules other than those evolved by the necessity of energy manifesting the experiences intended by Consciousness, or.. by the self-imposed limitations of our own individualized perceptions..

The entirety of Life and existence is the Singularity experiencing its own self-discovery through itself manifested as we/us/life, through itself as the Cosmos and the Cosmic Memory.. the whole of this cycle of endless cycles of Cosmoses culminates at the intersection of Consciousness, awareness, intelligence, energy, and potential, or.. as we more fondly like to label it, the continuous moment of ‘Now’, Creation.. the ripple of Consciousness expanding into the Void, leaving reality in its wake as it ‘feels’ its way into its next grandest version of itself.. we/us/Life are the answer to THE question, “WHAT AM I”?[/FONT]

 

[unk1]

My third eye is not open though I've always been able to pick up vibrations from the earth. In my youth I would discount them and just chalk it up to being silly, possibly insane, etc. What type of intellectual being wants to be labeled as being nuts? Being insecure and pushed around as a child made me turn my back on my spiritual blessings/gifts because I just wanted to be normal and accepted by others. I myself wondered at times if I was potentially insane, mentally unstable, or just highly imaginative. I've come to realize, now that I've challenged and beaten most of my insecurities, that the information accessible to us is vast, but must deciphered or recognized to be of use. My clairsentience is improving, as I no longer discount it, and in time I hope to bring light to my third eye. The irony of all this is that many of my longtime friends think I'm nuts. Here in SoCal, in the OC, it's all about finances and perceived success. It's hard to find people that relate.

totally know what you mean. wish i had something intelligent to add but it's been a long day haha.

 

[RetroGrow]

Hi Retro, I wanted to say thanks again for teaching me about the aspirin. I recommend it to everyone now

Yes we will learn peace as the earth becomes more populated.
Humans do not enjoy violence for the most part. It makes our stay here uncomfortable, just as too much sun might make a fair skinned person uncomfortable. In time the offspring of the fair skinned person will darken in order to bring comfort, and essentially peace will be made with the sun. Evolution is about being at peace with, or adapting to the elements, whether physically or non physically.
The flat earth was taught by scientist of the time and they knew it was a lie. It takes about 5min of reading about astrology, and history for that matter to see it was fabricated. It's part of the Columbus lie. 6000 years of astrology is evidence people knew of a spherical earth. It's the only way astrology can be correct. Yes, basic astronomy preceded astrology, and was improved upon. Many people argue that astrology has no merit as a science but fail to consider that it is based on astronomical movements.

Many evolutionary scientists, as well as creationists, are just swallowing and regurgitating whatever bullshit they've been fed. They are on opposite ends of the specrtrum. Without balance one cannot percieve or begin to understand truth. I don't advocate either of these philosophies/theories.

Where do I begin? As the world becomes more populated, we have less peace, more chaos, more fighting for limited resources, more wars.
Man does enjoy violence. Notice what movies and television are the most popular? Violent ones. One violent show after another, so people must be enjoying it. Televison is MOSTLY violence. What does our government spend the most money on? Weapons!
As far as astrology, don't get me started. It is NOT science. It is fantasy/mythology. No basis in science whatsoever. It's the anti-science. People who believe in astrology also believe in tarot cards and psychics. Utter nonsense.