BioAG Vam is the only product I'd recommend. VAM includes seven species of endo-mycorrhizae with a heavy dose of the aggressive Glomus intraradices, It should also be noted that VAM contains only endo-mycorrhizae so growers aren’t wasting money on ectos that only associate with trees.
The MOST IMPORTANT aspect is that VAM does not contain any Trichoderma which is cheap, the spore count for it in these mixes usually eclipses all the other organisms put together. Unlike endomycorrhizal fungi, Trichoderma requires no root contact to sprout and grow. In addition to this, its favorite food is other fungi...... guess what happens if your chosen product contains 10,000 spores per gram of Trichoderma and 100 spores per gram total of other fungal species.... think highlander.
The biology of mycorrhizas home page
Cultivating diversity underground for better yields above
USDA Research Project: DEVELOPMENT OF EFFICIENT AND PRACTICAL METHODS FOR PRODUCING ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
ACTIVE INGREDIENT:
ENDOMYCORRHIZAL (AM) FUNGI
Glomus intraradices (viable spores/g)3,200
Sorry I meant EndoMaxima
EndoMaxima is a concentrate of spores representing a generalist Glomus species that is global and which will always work with*plants*that can associate with an Endo (VAM) type mycorrhizae. Guaranteed to contain at minimum 1,450,000 viable spores of*Glomus intradices*per pound! Every attempt is made to screen EndoMaxima of all root tissues, dead fungal tissues, soil, and other impurities, all of which can contribute to loss of spore viability
Umm, can one of the you Neil Degrasse Tyson mofos translate for me? You guys sayin the VAM is the way to go? Even for hydro? How does this compare to ACT (tea). Sorry if that was in the thread somewhere. I honestly couldn't decipher this one....
"In reality if you are serious about getting endomycorrhizal fungi to colonize the roots of your plants you should know that, according to current science of which I am aware, there are only two known endomycorrhizal fungi species which colonize the roots of cannabis/hemp."
Would it be too much to ask one cite the scientific sources of said current science?