I don´t know if this is crap:
Could diffent correlation of cannabinoids. create diferent effects
Ever find a keeper in a pack or two? (< rhetorical)
I don´t know if this is crap:
Could diffent correlation of cannabinoids. create diferent effects
No offense meant! It was a jokeThat could very well be the case. Lot of my old grow buddies are still very to themselves. We also had a hash plant cut around the same time that was as potent as any chem. We were told that hash plant was smuggled back to the states from afghan in the 70's. Still have it but it is tired!
I heard tissue culture might restore vigor to a clone. Idk I could be trippin.
NLD
-SamS
It seems to me if the Afghan Strains deserve the Afghanicathen the SE Asian deserve recognition as well. Both are distinct lines caused by restricted pools derived from NLD.
Taking a cutting off a plant that's been in bloom for a few weeks resets the vigor, sorta like a mini re-veg!! A few of my pals have done this to their old clones with great success.
Taking a cutting off a plant that's been in bloom for a few weeks resets the vigor, sorta like a mini re-veg!! A few of my pals have done this to their old clones with great success.
Have done that a few times over the years. Taste is just not what it used to be. The smell too. Still very strong thc content.
Looks like I should have read more...
Thai = C. indica spp. indica var. indochinensis
View Image
Photo taken from Cannabis evolution and ethnobotany.
12%. Chems regularly test in the 20%. My Chem D at 27%. Lady at test place told me it was highest she ever tested.
So you were trying to trick us old guy's? No problem, you did, I am still amazed, is the plant any good? A good yielder? Taste? Is it more NLD, SATIVA or WLD, INDICA?
-SamS
Yeah Pbud we probably have the same Chem D cut, got mine outta CO. and it came in at 26% here!! Got some unreleased Chem D x A35 that a few peeps have ran already that have turned out killer ....there maybe a bx in the making!!! The A35 Mota used made some A+++ hybrids, a 35+ year old strain that's not like your textbook affie.
Fair enough....
but we also use NLD for Yunnan, Nepal and Kerala. They are a far cry from the NLD in Thailand/SE Asia.
I'm not trying to be difficult but I've taken graduate taxonomy/cladistics/botany so I know debate over the semantics of issues like this is never ending.
I think the dog bud which is the parents of OG and Chem came from the hippie trail in the 70's that went to Afgan and brought back beans. Prob were growing it for years before we got it. Chem d was a bagseed that chemdog found in the dog bud we sent him.
I did love the tai stick and Afgan and Laos bud we got in NYC in the mid 80's. But it doesn't touch the chem genetics in my opinion. Just my opinion. Pot today, is stronger. And Chem d is the most potent of all!
That could very well be the case. Lot of my old grow buddies are still very to themselves. We also had a hash plant cut around the same time that was as potent as any chem. We were told that hash plant was smuggled back to the states from afghan in the 70's. Still have it but it is tired!
It looks like any of the true pure BLD lines that left Afghanistan hybridized with NLD and many maintained the broad leaf. Like the broad leaf we see today in Pakistan/Uzbekistan etc is reportedly hybridized.
Is this why you guys mentioned Pre-Soviet? I would think the war sent/brought seeds from the four corners of the world. Is the pure BLD in as much risk of extinction as the Tropical NLD???
Originally Posted by Sam_Skunkman
I am pretty sure Indicas were developed from Southern China varieties in the last five hundred years, after being moved to Afghanistan, et al.
The reason I like the more Indica Indica varieties is because the Indicas are cultivated for hash, the sativas just grow wild in Afghanistan and are mostly not even used, but they do contaminate the Indicas with Sativa genes, so you often see Indica/Sativa hybrids in seeds imported from Afghanistan. A good Indica to the farmers was one that made a lot of hash, on the flowers or leaves no difference, and the wild Sativas don't make as much hash.
If you saw fields in Afghanistan in the North from the early 1970's they were much more Indica looking because Cannabis was legal and proper seed production of pure Indicas was easier to accomplish and easier to obtain.
With 30 years of war the country and the genepool have been through hell.
Anyway what you seem to think of as normal Indica, is to me a mongrel of Indica and wild Sativas, while the exaggerated ones are the real Indica blood.
And yes I have many times grew out lots of seeds from Afghanistan and found Sativa or Indica/Sativa looking plants, but I have also grown out batches of seeds directly from Afghanistan that only gave classic Indicas. But to be honest every year they seem to be worse and maybe more Sativa.
Most seeds collected the last 10-20 years were from down south Afghanistan, while the best was always up in the north by Mazar & Balkh. Cannabis is a traditional up in the north with a lot of experienced growers and hash makers, as well as seed growers.
-SamS
Ever find a keeper in a pack or two? (< rhetorical)