What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

MMJ Patients cant buy or own guns.

DoobieDuck

Senior Member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Now some good news rep to Trichrider:


from : http://www.opposingviews.com/i/soci...l-medical-marijuana-patients’-gun-rights-case

Submitted by NORML on Jan 10, 2012


The question about owning guns while being a medical marijuana patient will not be addressed by the Highest Court in the Land. A gun-rights case that began in a small Oregon town may have finally reached the end of the line.

Cynthia Willis, a resident of the tiny town of Gold Hill, Oregon had been a long-time concealed hand-gun permit owner. In the town of about 1200 residents, Willis, a retired school bus driver, was looking to renew her concealed handgun permit when the sheriff in Jackson County that oversees the permitting found out she was also an Oregon Medical Marijuana Patient. Willis took her battle to court in 2008 over the matter.

Jackson County Sheriff Mike Winters argued that issuing the license would violate federal law, specifically the Gun Control Act of 1968. That act from 44 years ago specifically forbids anyone who uses or is addicted to a controlled substance from having a firearm. The court found that Sheriff Winters had no precedent to deny Ms Willis her renewed gun permit license based on the fact she was a medical marijuana patient. The sheriff took the case to an appellate court, where Willis prevailed again, then Winters took the case all the way to the Oregon Supreme Court. The highest court in Oregon also agreed with the lower courts.

Jackson County’s legal team were arguing that the Gun Control Act of 1968 was on their side, barring people who were considered dangerous or irresponsible and used controlled substances from owning a gun. They also said that a ruling in Cynthia Willis’ favor would force the sheriff to issue concealed weapons permits to people who admitted to using methamphetamine. They said where there is a conflict between state law and federal law, the federal law should prevail.

But the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that issuing gun permits to medical marijuana patients would not violate the federal Gun Control Act based on Oregon’s own concealed handgun licensing laws. The federal law in this case, the 1968 gun control act, only gives the states authority to set their own rules for gun ownership and concealed weapons permits, according to the Oregon Supreme Court. After that ruling, the persistant Jackson County Sheriff, Mike Winters had the county legal team prepare to take the case to the US Supreme Court to ask for clarification of the federal law he still believes outlaws guns in the hands of medical marijuana patients.

This week, the US Supreme Court decided not to hear the case, along with a similar gun-permit case from Washington County, Oregon. Since the state ruling, Sheriff Winter has had to provide concealed handgun licenses to Willis and other medical marijuana patients as a result of those court rulings.

NORML Legal Committee attorney Lee Berger, well-known activist lawyer in the state, had the case from the lower courts on up that ladder and said he hopes this message from the Supreme Court will force Winters and other sheriffs to respect the rights of medical marijuana patients. The case has cost the tiny county about $50,000 in legal fees.

External Links:

http://www.dailytidings.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120110/NEWS/201100311/-1/NEWSMAP
 
DD, great post brother. I hope this snowballs. This issue is actually a direct conflict with federal law and that is why they didn't hear it in the fed supreme court. The obvious ruling on this could be ammo for us legalization/reschedule folks, and even their refusal to hear the case has a little bit of forward motion in that regard. Great, great news!!!
 

medmaker420

The Aardvarks LED Grow Show
Veteran
We should have the right to guns and plants. Does anyone realize what 100% individual liberty means? Its sad but our country is just so damn pc it is bloody irritating.
 

megayields

Grower of Connoisseur herb's.
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Now some good news rep to Trichrider:


from : http://www.opposingviews.com/i/soci...l-medical-marijuana-patients’-gun-rights-case

Submitted by NORML on Jan 10, 2012


The question about owning guns while being a medical marijuana patient will not be addressed by the Highest Court in the Land. A gun-rights case that began in a small Oregon town may have finally reached the end of the line.

Cynthia Willis, a resident of the tiny town of Gold Hill, Oregon had been a long-time concealed hand-gun permit owner. In the town of about 1200 residents, Willis, a retired school bus driver, was looking to renew her concealed handgun permit when the sheriff in Jackson County that oversees the permitting found out she was also an Oregon Medical Marijuana Patient. Willis took her battle to court in 2008 over the matter.

Jackson County Sheriff Mike Winters argued that issuing the license would violate federal law, specifically the Gun Control Act of 1968. That act from 44 years ago specifically forbids anyone who uses or is addicted to a controlled substance from having a firearm. The court found that Sheriff Winters had no precedent to deny Ms Willis her renewed gun permit license based on the fact she was a medical marijuana patient. The sheriff took the case to an appellate court, where Willis prevailed again, then Winters took the case all the way to the Oregon Supreme Court. The highest court in Oregon also agreed with the lower courts.

Jackson County’s legal team were arguing that the Gun Control Act of 1968 was on their side, barring people who were considered dangerous or irresponsible and used controlled substances from owning a gun. They also said that a ruling in Cynthia Willis’ favor would force the sheriff to issue concealed weapons permits to people who admitted to using methamphetamine. They said where there is a conflict between state law and federal law, the federal law should prevail.

But the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that issuing gun permits to medical marijuana patients would not violate the federal Gun Control Act based on Oregon’s own concealed handgun licensing laws. The federal law in this case, the 1968 gun control act, only gives the states authority to set their own rules for gun ownership and concealed weapons permits, according to the Oregon Supreme Court. After that ruling, the persistant Jackson County Sheriff, Mike Winters had the county legal team prepare to take the case to the US Supreme Court to ask for clarification of the federal law he still believes outlaws guns in the hands of medical marijuana patients.

This week, the US Supreme Court decided not to hear the case, along with a similar gun-permit case from Washington County, Oregon. Since the state ruling, Sheriff Winter has had to provide concealed handgun licenses to Willis and other medical marijuana patients as a result of those court rulings.

NORML Legal Committee attorney Lee Berger, well-known activist lawyer in the state, had the case from the lower courts on up that ladder and said he hopes this message from the Supreme Court will force Winters and other sheriffs to respect the rights of medical marijuana patients. The case has cost the tiny county about $50,000 in legal fees.

External Links:

http://www.dailytidings.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120110/NEWS/201100311/-1/NEWSMAP


Nuff said a legal precedence has been set. Good enough for me, this thread can now be closed...lol FLAME AWAY! :laughing:
 

green_thumb...

Strain Whore Extraordinaire!
Veteran
Right there with ya,i got a S&W M&P .40 with 15rnds for the first guy expecting to take my rights away.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

green_thumb...

Strain Whore Extraordinaire!
Veteran
Now some good news rep to Trichrider:


from : http://www.opposingviews.com/i/soci...l-medical-marijuana-patients’-gun-rights-case

Submitted by NORML on Jan 10, 2012


The question about owning guns while being a medical marijuana patient will not be addressed by the Highest Court in the Land. A gun-rights case that began in a small Oregon town may have finally reached the end of the line.

Cynthia Willis, a resident of the tiny town of Gold Hill, Oregon had been a long-time concealed hand-gun permit owner. In the town of about 1200 residents, Willis, a retired school bus driver, was looking to renew her concealed handgun permit when the sheriff in Jackson County that oversees the permitting found out she was also an Oregon Medical Marijuana Patient. Willis took her battle to court in 2008 over the matter.

Jackson County Sheriff Mike Winters argued that issuing the license would violate federal law, specifically the Gun Control Act of 1968. That act from 44 years ago specifically forbids anyone who uses or is addicted to a controlled substance from having a firearm. The court found that Sheriff Winters had no precedent to deny Ms Willis her renewed gun permit license based on the fact she was a medical marijuana patient. The sheriff took the case to an appellate court, where Willis prevailed again, then Winters took the case all the way to the Oregon Supreme Court. The highest court in Oregon also agreed with the lower courts.

Jackson County’s legal team were arguing that the Gun Control Act of 1968 was on their side, barring people who were considered dangerous or irresponsible and used controlled substances from owning a gun. They also said that a ruling in Cynthia Willis’ favor would force the sheriff to issue concealed weapons permits to people who admitted to using methamphetamine. They said where there is a conflict between state law and federal law, the federal law should prevail.

But the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that issuing gun permits to medical marijuana patients would not violate the federal Gun Control Act based on Oregon’s own concealed handgun licensing laws. The federal law in this case, the 1968 gun control act, only gives the states authority to set their own rules for gun ownership and concealed weapons permits, according to the Oregon Supreme Court. After that ruling, the persistant Jackson County Sheriff, Mike Winters had the county legal team prepare to take the case to the US Supreme Court to ask for clarification of the federal law he still believes outlaws guns in the hands of medical marijuana patients.

This week, the US Supreme Court decided not to hear the case, along with a similar gun-permit case from Washington County, Oregon. Since the state ruling, Sheriff Winter has had to provide concealed handgun licenses to Willis and other medical marijuana patients as a result of those court rulings.

NORML Legal Committee attorney Lee Berger, well-known activist lawyer in the state, had the case from the lower courts on up that ladder and said he hopes this message from the Supreme Court will force Winters and other sheriffs to respect the rights of medical marijuana patients. The case has cost the tiny county about $50,000 in legal fees.

External Links:

http://www.dailytidings.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120110/NEWS/201100311/-1/NEWSMAP

Haaaa I shouldd go get my concealed weapons licence from that sheriff and show him my card to rub it in.

I'm maybe 10miles away from gold hill and am one more step away from getting that licence.
 

Bacchus

Throbbing Member
Veteran
Haaaa I shouldd go get my concealed weapons licence from that sheriff and show him my card to rub it in.

I'm maybe 10miles away from gold hill and am one more step away from getting that licence.

What you need to do is point out to the public how much tax payer money has been WASTED by the sheriff in pursing this issue.....

Even anti-MJ peeps will recognize the total waste of money this was.
 

CANNABEST

Active member
great.... now theres no way to protect ourselves and homes from robbers and thief. expect to have more home invasions.
 

DoobieDuck

Senior Member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Hey guys, I've been hunting my entire life until now when my disabilities no longer allow it. I love guns, just like some of you. But please, let's not turn this thread into a place to brag about what types and how many we own or I'll be forced to close it. The topic is gun rights and medical marijuana. I think Admin is allowing it only because of that relationship to medical marijuana. Thanks for understanding..DD
 

castout

Active member
Veteran
Bullshit!!!! I don't own a gun, and I probably won't get a gun either.......but it is my right to get one, if I choose to. Another way the GOVT undermines marijuana. They can arm the Mexican Cartels, terrorists in Afghanistan, but the right of a US citizen, that uses medical marijuana to own a gun, has been stripped away!!!!! BULLSHIT!
 

krunchbubble

Dear Haters, I Have So Much More For You To Be Mad
Veteran
not only can WE NOT own guns....

apparently we cant even defend ourselves apparently...

i got a felony for having a 14" club that you kill sharks and big fish with, next to my bed.......
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Did they make it stick, Krunch? I thought that the felonious nature of say, a baseball bat in your car, was different inside your house. Not sure why I thought that, though.....
 
its not the guns that we cant find.. it will soon be the ammunition that we cant buy.
never happen. Where I come from, over half the adult men hunt. No way that will fly ever. That would spell revolution for sure.

Lets just all vote for Ron Paul and we can make all this bullshit go away for real. If he can get the GOP nom he will likely be checking for trap doors on the resolute desk in no time. A Texan who wants to legalize MJ is about as good as it gets on this issue!!!
 
Top