self
Member
Thanks xmobotx, That makes more sense, I was wondering if the current recipes were based on some path dependency. I've been working with a combination of calcium and dolomite lime + gypsum to try to keep CA/MG ratios around 4-1. I started with aragonite (oyster flour) but it was way to expensive at the volume I needed, and with a little research it seemed like there was actually very little difference between aragonite and calcite.volcanic rock dust is a great alternative to glacial. you can even use basalt for both the basalt portion & the glacial. granite would be OK too. any CaCO3 source is a suitable alternative to oyster. mainly folks wanted to get away from the excessive magnesium associated w/ dolomite. Solomon's 3 part lime mix was a good 1st step {2 parts oyster 1 pt ea of gypsum & dolo} it still left a few people w/ too much mag.
many do OK using dolomite lime. seems like the humus portion is most important. you don;t want it to contribute too much K & you do want it to be alive {the critical part}
seems like i read something about cedar being problematic? idk but, if it seems particularly fresh anyway, you'll want to let it compost for a while ~so that time may just fix the cedar "problem" {if there actually is one}
As I understand it, (and correct me if Im wrong) the mineral flours are added as a building block for the creation of more soil. Ive assumed that the excess was to provide some mineral benefits directly to the plant while the soil incorporates the rest.
So between granite, basalt, and glacial rock dust, is it beneficial to use the full variety, or are the differences minor?
I used basalt and granite this run at 1 cup per cf, but i gave up on the aragonite and switched to a calcite/dolomite mix after 5 200 gallon pots.
final Q: what about azomite, sea 90, etc for minerals and micro nutrients? necessary? redundant?
Thanks for being so helpful, happy growing.