What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

LED and BUD QUALITY

xet

Active member
Not all HID's are orange 2100 Kelvin lamps.

The HID's ~5000 Kelvin+ will take excellent photos.

HID's come in a range of colors, CRI, gases, and spectra all the way up to 20,000 Kelvin (for comparison, the temperature of the sun regularly exceeds 20,000 Kelvin on the equator at high noon while the sun itself is widely agreed upon to be a constant black body radiation source ~5500-5800 Kelvin).

e.g. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00RHHG8FA/ - 20,000 Kelvin
https://www.amazon.com/CBConcept®-Double-150Watt-14000K-Aquarium/dp/7200067490 - 14,000 Kelvin
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0948TVC1W/ - 10,000 Kelvin
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007ZU6J8K/ - 7500 Kelvin
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00XWRD9S8 - 7200 Kelvin
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0057IKGZ4/ - 6500 Kelvin
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08MPSVYS4/ - 6000 Kelvin
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00GBTXF5Q - 5500 Kelvin

Check out this grow mixing Metal Halide HID's and LED
 
Last edited:

Cerathule

Well-known member
Yes, and some of the CMH lamps have a CRI of 98 and give way better colourtrueness than any whitelightchip based LED with its largely deficient SPD in violet and cyan. Just a single blue spike in about more than a hundred nanometer still within the lumen range...
 

Cerathule

Well-known member
315W-spectrum-UVcallout.png

e.g. this is a high-CRI CMH SPD
 

GoatCheese

Active member
Veteran
So, if I have understood how LEDs works, the problem can be solved with a simple translucent film (diffraction). Or not?

:unsure:
Diffusers seem to help a bit. I put thin – 0,8mm, clear diffuser sheets under my small diy veg light and it helped little but didn’t take all the heat out of the light.

The problem with diffusers is that they trap heat and so shorten the life span of led chips – the hotter you run your lights the bigger the problem will get.
 

JKD

Well-known member
Veteran
The (decreasing) downside of LEDs is penetration, which is overcome with intra-canopy lighting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xet

Ca++

Well-known member
The (decreasing) downside of LEDs is penetration, which is overcome with intra-canopy lighting.
Works really well with tomato's but our canopy is a bit sticky.

Don't get me wrong though. I have been using lights where people claim they won't work for decades. The influence the naysayers have over the sheep is stronger than facts though. We do have a side-lighted diary here on IC, but people don't recognise it
 

GoatCheese

Active member
Veteran
LoL where did you learn that? The photons certainly lose no energy between the diode and your plants.
What ”energy”?

I’m very clearly talking about heat radiation in that post you quoted.

Are you claiming photons hit the plant tissue just as warm as they left the diode and that the air doesn’t cool them down even one bit?

"LOL. Where did you learn that" ..f-ing idiot


You’re just like the few other geniuses in this thread; You can’t comprehend what you have just read – then you make a false claim - and then start mocking the other guy based on the stuff you just made up yourself.

No wonder people get fed up with ICMag and leave. We have too many shit talkers like you on board.

-

-

@Koondense. I know you “like” this kind of stupidity – comments that are more on your level.

You’re a “professional” to whom the real meaning of reflection in physics is whatever other people tell you it is, and you change your views based on what other people tell you the “facts” are on that particular day. A clown job professional.

You can’t make a conclusive statement about it thou you pretend to be such a pro. =Photons instantly bouncing off matter vs. being absorbed and then re-emitted works for you just fine as the same thing – thou they clearly aren’t the same thing, cause you’re a two-bit parrot.
 

shiva82

Well-known member
i use led cmh and hps. bud quality depends how the light is used . Maybe the double ended hps gives me my best buds but i use led and cmh to save on electric and reduce fan noise. leds are useful tools
 

GoatCheese

Active member
Veteran
LoL where did you learn that? The photons certainly lose no energy between the diode and your plants.
If there isn’t any “energy” loss from leds between the diode and the canopy, explain to everyone why the ppfd reading goes down when the light fixture is raised higher. It shouldn't if what you just wrote is correct.

@Cerathule , maybe you can help your boy out a bit, you’re well read person

Do you people spend anytime actually thing about this before you react?

I’m sure you guys can now see how f-ing stupid this gets over here?!

mars-hydro-fce-3000-best-dimmable-full-sepctrum-led-grow-lights-for-indoor-plants-ppfd-map-2.jpg
 

Ca++

Well-known member
What ”energy”?

I’m very clearly talking about heat radiation in that post you quoted.

Are you claiming photons hit the plant tissue just as warm as they left the diode and that the air doesn’t cool them down even one bit?

"LOL. Where did you learn that" ..f-ing idiot


You’re just like the few other geniuses in this thread; You can’t comprehend what you have just read – then you make a false claim - and then start mocking the other guy based on the stuff you just made up yourself.

No wonder people get fed up with ICMag and leave. We have too many shit talkers like you on board.

-

-

@Koondense. I know you “like” this kind of stupidity – comments that are more on your level.

You’re a “professional” to whom the real meaning of reflection in physics is whatever other people tell you it is, and you change your views based on what other people tell you the “facts” are on that particular day. A clown job professional.

You can’t make a conclusive statement about it thou you pretend to be such a pro. =Photons instantly bouncing off matter vs. being absorbed and then re-emitted works for you just fine as the same thing – thou they clearly aren’t the same thing, cause you’re a two-bit parrot.
Photons don't have a temperature.

Lets keep this simple enough for anyone to understand. I'm telling you that photon's have no temperature to loose. Prove otherwise or accept it's you that's making stuff up.

No insults. No talking about some other aspect to find a win. Photon's can't loose any temperature, because they don't have one.
 

Cerathule

Well-known member
@Cerathule , maybe you can help your boy out a bit, you’re well read person

Do you people spend anytime actually thing about this before you react?

I’m sure you guys can now see how f-ing stupid this gets over here?!
Hey, no offense I'm just in a silly mood from excessive smoking ;)

So a photon can only change its frequency, which can be expressed as wavelength (in e.g. nanometer nm) as well and that correlates with its energy.

_licht_w.jpg


The diminishing of what you call "heat radiation" is due to the spread of the photons due to the fixtures beam angle. Diminishing their numbers with distance.

The modern LED light can be considered "more cold" in comparison to a HPS lamp, but that is due to the HPS emitting much IR. The LEDs light is still more energetic, ie. higher raw amount of photons pumped out each second.

But not everytime a photon gets absorbed by matter, it causes an increase in local heat. The energy of the photon can e.g. be used to engage a chemical reaction, like in photosynthesis. Then the heat is stored latent within the organic matter, deconposition sets it free (we use that in biofuel generators). It can also be reflected, cause ionization... so the radiative heaters use specific IR wavelength to transfer heat energy onto matter.
 

Loc Dog

Hobbies include "drinkin', smokin' weed, and all k
Veteran
I just popped in to see where LED's rank these days. Saw some really cheap ones from china. Very simple google search on photon temperature -

 

GoatCheese

Active member
Veteran
Photons don't have a temperature.

Lets keep this simple enough for anyone to understand. I'm telling you that photon's have no temperature to loose. Prove otherwise or accept it's you that's making stuff up.

No insults. No talking about some other aspect to find a win. Photon's can't loose any temperature, because they don't have one.
Thermal energy is emitted photons. Infra red radiation etc. are photons too

 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top