Gogin_Diddle
Active member
Frosty. It looks like it will make some nice hash. It hasn't started stacking yet, so that is a real good amount of trich coverage so early in flowerKey this LED grow View attachment 18753592
Frosty. It looks like it will make some nice hash. It hasn't started stacking yet, so that is a real good amount of trich coverage so early in flowerKey this LED grow View attachment 18753592
LEDs definitely have 1 thing on HIDs. They take much better picturesI've had amazing results with flouros, HPS.
Very good results with CMH.
Nice results with LED but the buds lacked some depth in the effects. The resin was drier and less oily/tacky.
Not all HID's are orange 2100 Kelvin lamps.HIDs.
Diffusers seem to help a bit. I put thin – 0,8mm, clear diffuser sheets under my small diy veg light and it helped little but didn’t take all the heat out of the light.So, if I have understood how LEDs works, the problem can be solved with a simple translucent film (diffraction). Or not?
Yes, This is exactly what i have been saying all along; led-photons – which also act as carriers of heat radiation- need enough air between the light source and the canopy so that they have cooled down enough before they hit the plant tissue.
Works really well with tomato's but our canopy is a bit sticky.The (decreasing) downside of LEDs is penetration, which is overcome with intra-canopy lighting.
What ”energy”?LoL where did you learn that? The photons certainly lose no energy between the diode and your plants.
Are you claiming photons hit the plant tissue just as warm as they left the diode and that the air doesn’t cool them down even one bit?
If there isn’t any “energy” loss from leds between the diode and the canopy, explain to everyone why the ppfd reading goes down when the light fixture is raised higher. It shouldn't if what you just wrote is correct.LoL where did you learn that? The photons certainly lose no energy between the diode and your plants.
Photons don't have a temperature.What ”energy”?
I’m very clearly talking about heat radiation in that post you quoted.
Are you claiming photons hit the plant tissue just as warm as they left the diode and that the air doesn’t cool them down even one bit?
"LOL. Where did you learn that" ..f-ing idiot
You’re just like the few other geniuses in this thread; You can’t comprehend what you have just read – then you make a false claim - and then start mocking the other guy based on the stuff you just made up yourself.
No wonder people get fed up with ICMag and leave. We have too many shit talkers like you on board.
-
-
@Koondense. I know you “like” this kind of stupidity – comments that are more on your level.
You’re a “professional” to whom the real meaning of reflection in physics is whatever other people tell you it is, and you change your views based on what other people tell you the “facts” are on that particular day. A clown job professional.
You can’t make a conclusive statement about it thou you pretend to be such a pro. =Photons instantly bouncing off matter vs. being absorbed and then re-emitted works for you just fine as the same thing – thou they clearly aren’t the same thing, cause you’re a two-bit parrot.
Man, you are smart! LOLNot even one bit.
Hey, no offense I'm just in a silly mood from excessive smoking@Cerathule , maybe you can help your boy out a bit, you’re well read person
Do you people spend anytime actually thing about this before you react?
I’m sure you guys can now see how f-ing stupid this gets over here?!
Thermal energy is emitted photons. Infra red radiation etc. are photons tooPhotons don't have a temperature.
Lets keep this simple enough for anyone to understand. I'm telling you that photon's have no temperature to loose. Prove otherwise or accept it's you that's making stuff up.
No insults. No talking about some other aspect to find a win. Photon's can't loose any temperature, because they don't have one.