jonesfam7715
Active member
A 4200k cmh is hard to beat, especially when supplemented with led. That's the highest quality I've been able to achieve. I do believe it is possible to get there with led alone but I haven't been able to, yet.
That’s apples and oranges though … now take a hi IQ an aborigine and vs a low IQ one … it would be exactly same for Europeans too ..It's because I've taken those tests that I know cultural knowledge and physiology (including phenomenal short and long-term memory in the case of the Australian Aboriginal) will help you survive in the Australian desert where high IQ alone will not. If high IQ offered an evolutionary advantage to surviving in the Australian desert, then it would be reflected in standard IQ tests of Australian Aboriginals.
Which is the point I was making. IQ is not the be-all, end-all in terms of evolution.
If your point is that Intelligence Quotient – as defined by standard tests – transcends race, then you are correct. Which is why I didn't use the term IQ; I merely said "Our physical traits, including how we measure intelligence, are a product of our environment."
Some interesting reading on the subject here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886909003882#:~:text=Galton estimated the intelligence of,proposed by Lynn (2006).
Iq is the ability to learn. A high iq person will adapt to new surroundings faster.It's because I've taken those tests that I know cultural knowledge and physiology (including phenomenal short and long-term memory in the case of the Australian Aboriginal) will help you survive in the Australian desert where high IQ alone will not. If high IQ offered an evolutionary advantage to surviving in the Australian desert, then it would be reflected in standard IQ tests of Australian Aboriginals.
Which is the point I was making. IQ is not the be-all, end-all in terms of evolution.
If your point is that Intelligence Quotient – as defined by standard tests – transcends race, then you are correct. Which is why I didn't use the term IQ; I merely said "Our physical traits, including how we measure intelligence, are a product of our environment."
Some interesting reading on the subject here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886909003882#:~:text=Galton estimated the intelligence of,proposed by Lynn (2006).
I think everyone that was going to convert to LED has. That was a lot of sales volume, but is now done. All them good time boom companies are now on the brink, and need to sell us something new. Even the true horticultural brands have sold enough to make pricing competitive for home use. LEDs can now be found second hand. It's a saturated market.
Today it's add on bars, and fancy wifi controllers they want us to buy. So you can do that 2 hours, but not with a timer. Oh no. You need the app. This spectrum chasing promise is alluring, but look how many people stick with HPS. A spectrum LED lights have not tried to sell us. Not long ago, plants couldn't see green, and it bounced off. Then green had the best penetration. I think if your light works, use it. Let the experts chase their tales, unless something happens. This spectrum chasing takes decades to produce results, which will be instantly shared. Until then, buy what we understand. Which is really what it's always been. Cooler light for veg and warmer light for flower. Or just buy one light, and be done with it. The answer to a decent grow, isn't a bit of electronics you just buy.
Edited to say isn't as I typo'd it's (making a totally contrairy comment)
I found out that with HPS and led mixed up there is no "to much" light from leds I can put buds at 5cm from led board nothing will be burned or bleached on plant.
Its bad light spectrum from leds and plant dont know to behave properly under it.
Thatd just my speculation based on few previous runs I got under HPS/led mixed up.
Better question is why would he want to...Iq is the ability to learn. A high iq person will adapt to new surroundings faster.
A smart person could adapt to aboriginal ways. Can that native adapt to living in New York and get a job?
A smart person can't change their physiology.Iq is the ability to learn. A high iq person will adapt to new surroundings faster.
He or she would find it more difficult. But it would not be as immediately life-threatening as dropping a smart New Yorker in the middle of the desert. In each case, they would both need the assistance of locals to survive.A smart person could adapt to aboriginal ways. Can that native adapt to living in New York and get a job?
It's an excellent question. I have spent time in remote Aboriginal communities and I believe it is as difficult for them to adapt to our world as it is for us to adapt to theirs. Their values are very different to ours. That is one thing most white Australians do not understand. It is probably the same of many indigenous peoples around the world.Better question is why would he want to...
No it's not. My point all along is that IQ has been a more important evolutionary advantage in some environments than others. Think about it: if all that was required to overcome all environmental adversity was the ability to think your way out of it, then all civilisations would have evolved the same. But they didn't. They each have physiological features adapted to their environments that have nothing to do with IQ.That’s apples and oranges though … now take a hi IQ an aborigine and vs a low IQ one … it would be exactly same for Europeans too ..
A smart person can use clothes and shelter to stay out of the sun.A smart person can't change their physiology.
They can't change their skin colour. They can't grow longer, lighter legs. They can't change the rate at which they sweat. They can't change their body's thermal management of blood flow during extreme cold and heat. They can't change the rate at which their blood coagulates. They can't change the impact-resistance of their skulls. They can't change the visual acuity of their eyes.
These are just some of the evolutionary adaptions of Australian Aborigines that Europeans don't possess.
How many generations of high IQ people would it take to reach the same level of physiological adaption to the Australian desert do you think?
He or she would find it more difficult. But it would not be as immediately life-threatening as dropping a smart New Yorker in the middle of the desert. In each case, they would both need the assistance of locals to survive.
But I think you're kind of missing the point. Some of the smartest people in the world are simple labourers struggling to make ends meet.
What is intelligence without drive and ambition?
How does intelligence help those with mental illness?
There is more to surviving in this world than being smart. Maybe it helps win arguments on the internet . . .
It's amazing how different they are (mostly in their physical attributes) with such a time in isolation. I presume they dropped down from China via Indonesia to get there. With both races diverging enough to be so distinctly different, it's near unimaginable.It's an excellent question. I have spent time in remote Aboriginal communities and I believe it is as difficult for them to adapt to our world as it is for us to adapt to theirs. Their values are very different to ours. That is one thing most white Australians do not understand. It is probably the same of many indigenous peoples around the world.
Yeah, but make sure its on a light rail that moves back & forth. Crank it up to full blast Its almost like having 2 LED fixtures that are dimmed to 50%. Keep the electric hedge trimmers around so you can keep the canopy flat as possible before the buds start to form. Ahh yeah!So can I just drop this bitch straight down on the buds like I would an HPS? Just wherever the temp is 82 or below and let it hang?!
This thread is going off on a tangent, but I think you're putting the cart before the horse.A smart person can use clothes and shelter to stay out of the sun.
There are so many exceptions to this case that I'm not sure how you can make such a statement and expect people to agree with you.Iq measures something real. There is no bigger indicator of success than Iq score. A minority in America from a broken home with a 130 Iq, will do better than a white guy at 100.
No. I'm saying specific genotypes evolved from different environments. Race is a parameter.“These are just some of the evolutionary adaptions of Australian Aborigines that Europeans don't possess”
Apples and oranges again
Now you’re saying we all think alike ?
Anyway this isn’t an anthropological thread Was just pointing out you need to keep the parameters the same