Joe Biden Thread

[mowood3479]

All of them apply to Trump though, if you disagree on any could you say why?
You should check that common org.story for the guys reasoning on each point, it’s not that long.

Cool tidbit about Trump transcribing Hitlers speeches though right?

You know, your initial question about trump not being fascist because he doesn’t harm journalists can be answered by saying not every attribute of fascism needs to be achieved to be considered a fascist situation.

If you want an detailed explanation of maga and fascism, the video Cannavore posted above is worthwhile

I don’t follow off site links For op sec.
Could you be so kind to summarize? I have heard a lot of liberals calling trump a fascist...
I’ve yet to see any real explanation as to how he qualifies?
I don’t like fascism and would like to be abreast if there are actual fascists in high level govt positions

 

[redlaser]

I don’t follow off site links For op sec.
Could you be so kind to summarize? I have heard a lot of liberals calling trump a fascist...
I’ve yet to see any real explanation as to how he qualifies?
I don’t like fascism and would like to be abreast if there are actual fascists in high level govt positions

Check post 3510 of this thread for trump/ hitler matches, can search (common org trump hitler 20 ways), for the detailed reasoning on each point.

Search (maga fascism renegade cut ), to get a better explanation of maga and fascism.

Examples are, banning Muslims from entering the country, arresting people and putting them into unmarked vehicles without identification.

Trying to call off the election over COVID, and then trying to overturn election results.
Full court press on the science denial of all aspects of COVID

The whole maga movement is based on fascist ideology.

-nationalism ( anti- immigration, “America first”)
- preoccupation with a plot (deep state)
- a mythic past ( make America great again)
- in groups and out groups based on nationality, race, gender , religion etc.

Just because Trump is not 100% successful with his efforts, and is sometimes kept in check, doesn’t mean the fascist ideology doesn’t exist

 

[Doctor M]

Scientific American backs Biden in its 1st presidential endorsement

Scientific American (magazine) on Tuesday endorsed Joe Biden, the first presidential endorsement in the magazine’s 175-year history.

Its editors said they felt “compelled” to do so because President Trump’s well-documented rejection of science, from climate change to the coronavirus, has cost tens of thousands of American lives.

“The pandemic would strain any nation and system,” the editors wrote, “but Trump’s rejection of evidence and public health measures have been catastrophic in the U.S. He was warned many times in January and February about the onrushing disease, yet he did not develop a national strategy to provide protective equipment, coronavirus testing or clear health guidelines.

“Trump claimed, falsely, that ‘anybody that wants a test can get a test,’” they continued. “That was untrue in March and remained untrue through the summer. Trump opposed $25 billion for increased testing and tracing that was in a pandemic relief bill as late as July. These lapses accelerated the spread of disease through the country — particularly in highly vulnerable communities that include people of color, where deaths climbed disproportionately to those in the rest of the population.”

The monthly magazine, with a circulation of 3.5 million, is owned by Springer Nature, an international academic and scientific publishing company.

According to data from Johns Hopkins University, more than 195,000 Americans have died from complications related to COVID-19, and more than 6.5 million have been infected.

The magazine’s editors seized on the revelations in Bob Woodward’s new book, “Rage,” that the president knowingly misled Americans about the dangers of COVID-19.

“Trump repeatedly lied to the public about the deadly threat of the disease, saying it was not a serious concern and ‘this is like a flu?’ when he knew it was more lethal and highly transmissible,” the editors wrote. “His lies encouraged people to engage in risky behavior, spreading the virus further, and have driven wedges between Americans who take the threat seriously and those who believe Trump’s falsehoods.”

Joe Biden and President Trump. (Alex Wong/Getty Images; David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Joe Biden and President Trump. (Alex Wong/Getty Images; David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
They also sharply criticized a White House memo attacking Dr. Anthony Fauci, the country’s leading infectious disease physician and a member of Trump’s coronavirus task force, calling it a “despicable attempt to sow further distrust.”

Trump’s rejection of science extends beyond COVID-19, the editors noted.

“He has repeatedly tried to get rid of the Affordable Care Act while offering no alternative,” they wrote. The president’s proposals to cut billions of dollars from the budgets of the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “increase the risk that new diseases will surprise and devastate us again.”

And Trump has “hobbled U.S. preparations for climate change, falsely claiming that it does not exist and pulling out of international agreements to mitigate it.”

The endorsement came a day after Trump, meeting with officials in California about the state’s catastrophic wildfires, dismissed global warming as an issue, saying, “It’ll start getting cooler” — echoing his prediction at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic that the virus would disappear on its own.

Biden, in contrast, “comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making,” the magazine argued. “He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”

“The 2020 election is literally a matter of life and death,” the magazine concluded. “We urge you to vote for health, science and Joe Biden for President.”

If Glen Greenwald, CNN and the Guardian are to be believed Joe is an anti science, racist, Wall street puppet.







The president-elect has tapped a former DuPont consultant to join his Environmental Protection Agency transition board
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...-joe-biden-are-you-kidding-me-erin-brockovich

 

[aridbud]

If Glen Greenwald, CNN and the Guardian are to be believed Joe is an anti science, racist, Wall street puppet.


That's one person's opinion.

 

[Doctor M]

If Glen Greenwald, CNN and the Guardian are to be believed Joe is an anti science, racist, Wall street puppet.


That's one person's opinion.

One persons' opinion? Can you show me where you concluded it's "one person's opinion"?

Here I thought it was campaign contribution disclosures, Joe Biden's own words and information from the Biden campaign on selections to his cabinet.

 

[armedoldhippy]

If Glen Greenwald, CNN and the Guardian are to be believed Joe is an anti science, racist, Wall street puppet.

between chump & Biden, one of them refuses to take medical experts advice that does not push his personal belief, one of them has been repeatedly sued (and settled) for policies regarding rentals to minorities, and one of them thinks all of America is doing fine as long as the stock market is happy. i'll make this easy for you...that persons name is NOT Joe Biden...

 

[Hammerhead]

It's also MSM bullshit. We all know there isn't a site any could post as credible at this point.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

https://www.commondreams.org/views/...ways-trump-copying-hitlers-early-rhetoric-and

A leading civil rights lawyer outlines 20 ways Trump is copying Hitlers early rhetoric.

In trumps first divorce filings, his wife mentions he kept and transcribed Hitlers pre WW2 speeches in a locked cabinet.


1: Neither elected by majority vote.

2: Both found direct communication channels to their base.

3: Both blame others and divide in racial lines.

4: Both relentlessly demonize opponents

5: They increasingly attack objective truth

6: Their attacks on truth include science

7: Their lies blur reality, and supporters spread them

8: Both orchestrated mass rallies to show status

9: They embraced extreme nationalism

10: Both made closing borders a centerpiece

11: They embraced mass detention and deportation

12: Both used border closings to protect select industries

13: They cemented their rule by enriching the elites

14: Both rejected international norms

15: Both attacked domestic democratic processes

16: Both attacked the judiciary and rule of law

17: Both glorify military and demand loyal oaths

18: They proclaim unchecked power

19: They relentlessly attack mainstream media

20. Both relegate women to subordinate roles


*Cannavore posted this in the blatant election fraud thread 11/14

1: Neither elected by majority vote.
Answer: This is irrelevant to fascism claims for many reasons. And speaks to my main point about media support being essential. Hitler had media support whereas the media was weaponized (by fascists) against Trump (with few exceptions).

2: Both found direct communication channels to their base.
Answer: This is irrelevant to fascism claims, but does speak to the fact that there was a need for him to do so because of Fascistic media censorship and for national security, the president must have direct communication with the people. We didn't elect Twitter to oversee our national interests did we? No. They are fascist operatives.


3: Both blame others and divide in racial lines.
Answer: This is irrelevant to fascism, but it is the left that treats white people just as the nazis treated the Jews before the final solution. Trump has not used race to divide. The deep state has organized trigger events to create a racial divide. Democrats are the racists these days. The Republican party soaks up people of color and non whites like a parched spunge. And people of color and latinos and many other ethnicities are running from the confederate, er, Democrat party.

4: Both relentlessly demonize opponents
Answer: What do you call the war on terror that Obma and Bush led. So, Trump calls out the losers and the traitors. Good. That's what we hired him to do and why Twitter cencors him. As for Hitler. Yeah, he did worse than Demonizing. So, the author of this piece is already established to be a blithering idiot. But, I'll keep going...

5: They increasingly attack objective truth
Answer: Who's objective truth? The media's and other liars?

6: Their attacks on truth include science
Answer: Nothing to do with fascism, but scrutiny of so called "science" is part of the scientific process. So, good.

7: Their lies blur reality, and supporters spread them
Answer: Just another stupid baseless accusation really. And once again, this "expert" author of fascism makes another irrelevant point in regards to fascism.

8: Both orchestrated mass rallies to show status
Answer: Re-read answers from above.

9: They embraced extreme nationalism
Trump does not embrace EXTREME nationalism. It is simply the job of the president to have an america first agenda. He worked out a bunch of trade deals. So what is so extreme? His border policy? I guess Obama is once again the big fascist because he didnt even have an america first agenda, but he deported and caged countless people.

10: Both made closing borders a centerpiece
Answer: See all answers above

11: They embraced mass detention and deportation
Answer: For different reasons. But what do you call the prison industrial complex that Biden helped create with all the other nevertrumpers? If you want to compare anyone to hitler as far as incarcerations. Lokk at Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. And his son's a crack head. Not dissing crack heads, just saying his dad put hundreds of thousands(?) into prisons or "concentration camps" as you call them.

12: Both used border closings to protect select industries
Answer: Irrelevant and a good service to our industries, if that is even true. So, you don't want the POTUS to protect our national economy? Why not, may I ask?

13: They cemented their rule by enriching the elites
Answer: This is erroneous and Obama was a legend in the whole bailing out the banks thing. It is not reported, but Trump is saving our economy through the use of the SPV. Trump has taken over the federal reserve and is making it buy our debt.

14: Both rejected international norms
Answer: You mean British rule? Fuck international norms. You must not be an American. You gave that away right there. Why would America give a fuck about international norms? International norms to me means UN using the US as a war machine to take over sovereign countries and bring hell into these countries and killing millions of people to keep world trade NORMS going. Is that what the author is talking about? Who has killed more innocent people, Hitler or the US after WW2, but before Trump?

15: Both attacked domestic democratic processes
Answer: Erroneous

16: Both attacked the judiciary and rule of law
Answer: Trump is using the law correctly and like a 5D chessplayer. Cry as you might, he is not breaking the laws.

17: Both glorify military and demand loyal oaths
Answer: He's the commander in chief. This author is stupid and so are his readers.

18: They proclaim unchecked power
Answer: Prove it.

19: They relentlessly attack mainstream media
Answer: Good, the media deserves a good thrashing and a hard time. The American people have a low opinion of the media in general. Did you know that? Also note that once again this has nothing to do with Hitler and fascism and again shows that Trump is not fascist. If he were fascist he would have taken care of the media in illegal ways. The media will be dealt with. But it is because they broke the laws and will be brought to justice. It wont be because of new laws like a fascist would do. It will be pre-existing laws and they will be proven to be KNOWINGLY in violation.

20. Both relegate women to subordinate roles
Answer: Like the head of CIA?, Dept of Education? He has more women in his cabinet than any previous president in US history. Did you know that?

This was really a stupid list and interestingly had nothing to do with fascism. Which is the forced suppression of opposition. Which is what the 'nevertrumpers' do. Trump exposes his opposition. He doesn't forcibly suppress them unless they are enemies of the people such as certain Iranian terrorists who he took out and al Bagdaddi etc...
Not fascist. But, very good for America.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Imagine my shock, when I found out Joe Biden hired a Du Pont consultant who helped duPont navigate around environmental laws, as his EPA head....

 

[Absolem]

Imagine my shock, when I found out Joe Biden hired a Du Pont consultant who helped duPont navigate around environmental laws, as his EPA head....

Smart move. Now he has a guy who can plug those holes.

It's like hiring a hacker to show your the weak spots.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Smart move. Now he has a guy who can plug those holes.

It's like hiring a hacker to show your the weak spots.

Sounds like some Blue-anon bullshit to me... The guy who helped skirt environmental laws for dupont will save us.

The thing is that this is how the EPA has always been run and that is why Trump gutted it. That is why the Deep State media weaponized stories talking about how trump will destroy the environment because he fired a bunch of the chemical industry heads who took over the EPA after George Bush really gutted the good EPA that we had. Remember when the Union of Concerned Scientists exposed the Bush admin and the fact that they were illegally burning tons of EPA records and studies that the tax payers paid for. Including hazardous materials studies and records of studies. They were ordered to stop the burning of these records but emails leaked, showed that they were willfully violating those orders. The press were silent about it.

 

[Absolem]

Sounds like some Blue-anon bullshit to me... The guy who helped skirt environmental laws for dupont will save us.

The thing is that this is how the EPA has always been run and that is why Trump gutted it. That is why the Deep State media weaponized stories talking about how trump will destroy the environment because he fired a bunch of the chemical industry heads who took over the EPA after George Bush really gutted the good EPA that we had. Remember when the Union of Concerned Scientists exposed the Bush admin and the fact that they were illegally burning tons of EPA records and studies that the tax payers paid for. Including hazardous materials studies and records of studies. They were ordered to stop the burning of these records but emails leaked, showed that they were willfully violating those orders. The press were silent about it.

I don't believe anything you say. Haven't seen any of your claims ever pan out.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

I don't believe anything you say. Haven't seen any of your claims ever pan out.

"One must only look to see."
-Q

 

[mr.brunch]

‘Q is clearly an ARG (alternate reality game) hi jacked by people with political interests’
-some guy on a message board.
After all, that’s where the best info comes from,right?
I could probably find a YouTube if it helps.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

‘Q is clearly an ARG (alternate reality game) hi jacked by people with political interests’
-some guy on a message board.
After all, that’s where the best info comes from,right?
I could probably find a YouTube if it helps.

Youtube banished all mention of Q-anon except anti-Q propaganda and disinformation. Go right ahead.

 

[mr.brunch]

There’s no point, you’re clearly way down that rabbit hole.
Enjoy being played

 

[mr.brunch]

FBI anon, CIA anon etc. didn’t take off, then they realised it was too many letters.

 

[redlaser]

1: it’s not irrevelant, shows they both weren’t elected by a majority.
2: it’s a component of their fascism, is it not? Harder to communicate otherwise effectively.
3: it’s not irrelevant, it’s accurate for Trump, just because you can demonize others makes it no less accurate for Trump.
4: again, just because you hate others makes it no less accurate for Trump.
5: good example for attacking objective truth. A truth can be corroborated from others sources.
6: attacks on intellectuals and the arts is fascism 101, attacking science would be included in that.
7: again, not baseless, trump is an open hydrant of lies, that you and the maga’s regurgitate at length.
8:mass rallies are a commonality
9: extreme nationalism examples would be banning travel from Muslim countries and portraying Mexicans as rapists and criminals. An American foreign policy built on disruption versus coalition building.
10:again, closing borders they both had in common
11: mass detention and deportation applies to both. Save your Hunter nonsense for another thread
12: I don’t actually know how this one applies.
13: enriching elites could apply to others, obviously includes trump with the tax breaks and hiring corporate lobbyists for his cabinet
14:rejected international norms through disruption versus building alliances. Weakens us so he can pretend to be tuff. If you read the guys reasoning about each point you wouldn’t have to ask me about it.
15:attempting to de legitimize elections, both before and after, of both 2016 and 2020 qualifies for attacking domestic democratic processes.
16: trump attacks unfavorable court rulings by attacking the judge personally, sometimes on racial lines, as an example.
17:anyone telling truth, especially about trump gets fired, sounds like an oath of loyalty is required.
18:trump has proclaimed he’s is the highest law officer in the land, could shoot someone and get away with it. Sounds like unchecked power to me.
19:I knew you would be agreeing on attacking the media. Facts can corroborated, and if not go from there. Blaming the messenger for the content of a story is childish and a sign of an inability to do critical thinking to come to your own conclusions. Just because trump hasn’t jailed or killed them doesn’t mean he is not following a fascist playbook or ideology. You could remove 1-3 of these 20 points and still have a fascist. Not as all fascists are wildly successful, doesn’t mean they are not fascist.
20: two people are not a lot in the whole scheme of things, have you seen how many Biden is hiring and Obama had? That would be closer to the 50%+ female it should be.

Again, you need to read the reasoning for the listed 20 points to understand it. I’m not transcribing the entire thing.
And fascism doesn’t always include forced suppression, that is ahistorical . History has had a range of fascist movements.

MAGA;
- nationalism (anti immigration, “America First”)
- preoccupation with a plot ( “deep state” )
- a mythic past ( “make America great again”)
- in-groups and out-groups, based on nationality, race, gender,
religion, etc

Is maga fascist?

1: Neither elected by majority vote.
Answer: This is irrelevant to fascism claims for many reasons. And speaks to my main point about media support being essential. Hitler had media support whereas the media was weaponized (by fascists) against Trump (with few exceptions).

2: Both found direct communication channels to their base.
Answer: This is irrelevant to fascism claims, but does speak to the fact that there was a need for him to do so because of Fascistic media censorship and for national security, the president must have direct communication with the people. We didn't elect Twitter to oversee our national interests did we? No. They are fascist operatives.


3: Both blame others and divide in racial lines.
Answer: This is irrelevant to fascism, but it is the left that treats white people just as the nazis treated the Jews before the final solution. Trump has not used race to divide. The deep state has organized trigger events to create a racial divide. Democrats are the racists these days. The Republican party soaks up people of color and non whites like a parched spunge. And people of color and latinos and many other ethnicities are running from the confederate, er, Democrat party.

4: Both relentlessly demonize opponents
Answer: What do you call the war on terror that Obma and Bush led. So, Trump calls out the losers and the traitors. Good. That's what we hired him to do and why Twitter cencors him. As for Hitler. Yeah, he did worse than Demonizing. So, the author of this piece is already established to be a blithering idiot. But, I'll keep going...

5: They increasingly attack objective truth
Answer: Who's objective truth? The media's and other liars?

6: Their attacks on truth include science
Answer: Nothing to do with fascism, but scrutiny of so called "science" is part of the scientific process. So, good.

7: Their lies blur reality, and supporters spread them
Answer: Just another stupid baseless accusation really. And once again, this "expert" author of fascism makes another irrelevant point in regards to fascism.

8: Both orchestrated mass rallies to show status
Answer: Re-read answers from above.

9: They embraced extreme nationalism
Trump does not embrace EXTREME nationalism. It is simply the job of the president to have an america first agenda. He worked out a bunch of trade deals. So what is so extreme? His border policy? I guess Obama is once again the big fascist because he didnt even have an america first agenda, but he deported and caged countless people.

10: Both made closing borders a centerpiece
Answer: See all answers above

11: They embraced mass detention and deportation
Answer: For different reasons. But what do you call the prison industrial complex that Biden helped create with all the other nevertrumpers? If you want to compare anyone to hitler as far as incarcerations. Lokk at Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. And his son's a crack head. Not dissing crack heads, just saying his dad put hundreds of thousands(?) into prisons or "concentration camps" as you call them.

12: Both used border closings to protect select industries
Answer: Irrelevant and a good service to our industries, if that is even true. So, you don't want the POTUS to protect our national economy? Why not, may I ask?

13: They cemented their rule by enriching the elites
Answer: This is erroneous and Obama was a legend in the whole bailing out the banks thing. It is not reported, but Trump is saving our economy through the use of the SPV. Trump has taken over the federal reserve and is making it buy our debt.

14: Both rejected international norms
Answer: You mean British rule? Fuck international norms. You must not be an American. You gave that away right there. Why would America give a fuck about international norms? International norms to me means UN using the US as a war machine to take over sovereign countries and bring hell into these countries and killing millions of people to keep world trade NORMS going. Is that what the author is talking about? Who has killed more innocent people, Hitler or the US after WW2, but before Trump?

15: Both attacked domestic democratic processes
Answer: Erroneous

16: Both attacked the judiciary and rule of law
Answer: Trump is using the law correctly and like a 5D chessplayer. Cry as you might, he is not breaking the laws.

17: Both glorify military and demand loyal oaths
Answer: He's the commander in chief. This author is stupid and so are his readers.

18: They proclaim unchecked power
Answer: Prove it.

19: They relentlessly attack mainstream media
Answer: Good, the media deserves a good thrashing and a hard time. The American people have a low opinion of the media in general. Did you know that? Also note that once again this has nothing to do with Hitler and fascism and again shows that Trump is not fascist. If he were fascist he would have taken care of the media in illegal ways. The media will be dealt with. But it is because they broke the laws and will be brought to justice. It wont be because of new laws like a fascist would do. It will be pre-existing laws and they will be proven to be KNOWINGLY in violation.

20. Both relegate women to subordinate roles
Answer: Like the head of CIA?, Dept of Education? He has more women in his cabinet than any previous president in US history. Did you know that?

This was really a stupid list and interestingly had nothing to do with fascism. Which is the forced suppression of opposition. Which is what the 'nevertrumpers' do. Trump exposes his opposition. He doesn't forcibly suppress them unless they are enemies of the people such as certain Iranian terrorists who he took out and al Bagdaddi etc...
Not fascist. But, very good for America.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Responding to Redlaser:

1: it’s not irrevelant, shows they both weren’t elected by a majority.

Answer: If it is legal (within the law), than it is not fascism

2: it’s a component of their fascism, is it not? Harder to communicate otherwise effectively.

Answer: No, it simply is not. You are comunicating directly to people right now. Does that mean that you are to be compared to Hitler. Censorship is fascism. Speaking is liberty. The opposite of fascism.

3: it’s not irrelevant, it’s accurate for Trump, just because you can demonize others makes it no less accurate for Trump.

Answer: Everyone demonizes Trump. So, by your logic, they are all fascists and Trump is just responding. True. I guess you are like Hitler for accusing Trump of being like Hitler, because demonizing people is somehow Hitler like. If that is the case, what do you call Hillary Clinton's 'Basket of Deplorables' remark?

4: again, just because you hate others makes it no less accurate for Trump.

Answer: Who said I hate others? What are you talking about?

5: good example for attacking objective truth. A truth can be corroborated from others sources.

Answer: So can lies. Such as when the news corraborated uncorrabable sources and evidence accusing Trump of Treason with Russia. Objective Truth?

6: attacks on intellectuals and the arts is fascism 101, attacking science would be included in that.

Answer: So, like when Twitter censors doctors, scientists and others or when statues get torn down? Has Trump Censored anyone yet? Is criticism not part of science?

7: again, not baseless, trump is an open hydrant of lies, that you and the maga’s regurgitate at length.

Answer: That is a lie right there and an attack on 'objective truth' and an attack on a marginalized population. You must be just like Hitler. But, I wont call for you to be banned. I want you to keep going. It is better for me, the more you go on.

8:mass rallies are a commonality

Answer: Martin Luther King Jr held very large gatherings, or rallies, as you call them. It never occured to me how similar he was to Hitler. Thanks for pointing this out. I will avoid large gatherings such as concerts and other Hitler'esque events.

9: extreme nationalism examples would be banning travel from Muslim countries and portraying Mexicans as rapists and criminals. An American foreign policy built on disruption versus coalition building.

Answer: says a fascist globalist who wants a non-democratically elected global sovereign to overtake us and our national interests in order to impose a global monolithic agenda.

10:again, closing borders they both had in common

Answer: Canada closed their southern Border. I guess we all know what that means... Thanks to Redlaser's insight into "fascism."

11: mass detention and deportation applies to both. Save your Hunter nonsense for another thread

Answer: Bossing me around feels kinda like being yelled at by Hitler.

12: I don’t actually know how this one applies.

13: enriching elites could apply to others, obviously includes trump with the tax breaks and hiring corporate lobbyists for his cabinet

Answer: but, you've never heard of the SPV because your media is too busy protecting you from the liberty of freedom of speech.

14:rejected international norms through disruption versus building alliances. Weakens us so he can pretend to be tuff. If you read the guys reasoning about each point you wouldn’t have to ask me about it.

Answer: Erroneous

15:attempting to de legitimize elections, both before and after, of both 2016 and 2020 qualifies for attacking domestic democratic processes.

Answer: I believe it is about to be revealed that Trump won the popular vote in both elections (stay tuned).

16: trump attacks unfavorable court rulings by attacking the judge personally, sometimes on racial lines, as an example.

Answer: It's called a legal defense (of our nation) and it was not an attack. How was Brett Kavenaugh treated, again?

17:anyone telling truth, especially about trump gets fired, sounds like an oath of loyalty is required.

Answer: That's because the "truth" they were telling, was lies. Simple. Are You attacking objective truth? Fascist!

18:trump has proclaimed he’s is the highest law officer in the land, could shoot someone and get away with it. Sounds like unchecked power to me.

Answer: Two separate statements not made together and taken out of context in a weaponized way (fascist like).

19:I knew you would be agreeing on attacking the media. Facts can corroborated, and if not go from there. Blaming the messenger for the content of a story is childish and a sign of an inability to do critical thinking to come to your own conclusions. Just because trump hasn’t jailed or killed them doesn’t mean he is not following a fascist playbook or ideology. You could remove 1-3 of these 20 points and still have a fascist. Not as all fascists are wildly successful, doesn’t mean they are not fascist.

Answer: No, once again that is all a bunch of fascist bull shit.

20: two people are not a lot in the whole scheme of things, have you seen how many Biden is hiring and Obama had? That would be closer to the 50%+ female it should be.

Answer: I only mentioned Two, out of many. That should have been obvious. And it is dissapointing that you did not research the answer.

Again, you need to read the reasoning for the listed 20 points to understand it. I’m not transcribing the entire thing.
And fascism doesn’t always include forced suppression, that is ahistorical . History has had a range of fascist movements.

Answer: I read it. It is 100% stupid Garbage (sorry if that upsets you, please don't compare me to Hitler about it). And No, None of that has anything to do with Fascism and fascism is basically limited to that definition (The forcible suppression of opposition).

Is maga fascist?
Answer: No. MAGA is Anti-Fascist.

 

[Cannavore]

"fascism is the forced suppression of opposition"


i think there's a little more to it than that