Joe Biden Thread

[imiubu]

Took less than two minutes. Computers make things really easy these days.

It sure took you a long time to respond publicly, though. You know... After privately telling me how little you care, almost immediately!

Back atcha'

Not that I need to explain but I will anyway. I logged off quickly and was unable to reply publicly until this morning.
To remain genuine; I became very hot (see what ya do to me?! LOL). I spiked a fever so quickly that I spent the remainder of the day sleeping it off. Real life happens sometimes ya know.

I do want to say... you damn near nailed it with your post though and that was my reason for the use of "bright".

I really have no personal issues w/ ya.

We're all here now IMHO just working off angst/ anxieties more so than actually discussing topics.

I'll reign it in though.
Thanks

 

[JKD]

Trump and Flynn attorney Sidney Powell just confirmed that the raid in Germany did happen, but says she doesn't know if "good guys got it or bad guys got it."

Hi Hempy. By not providing evidence Sidney Powell has only repeated an as yet unproven claim rather than confirming it.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Hi Hempy. By not providing evidence Sidney Powell has only repeated an as yet unproven claim rather than confirming it.

I could be wrong, but I think you are supposed to show the evidence in court. If she shows it before hand, would it be admissable? Do media pundits know the answer?

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

For those who think Trump is a fascist: Ask yourself this...

If Trump were a fascist, wouldnt all the reporters who weaponize questions against him be "disapeared?"

Name one fascist world leader that allowed press to act against their own fascist interests. Name one fascist regime that did not have TOTAL(itarian) control over the media.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Hi Hempy. By not providing evidence Sidney Powell has only repeated an as yet unproven claim rather than confirming it.

Military intelligence no doubt monitors and compares press coverage of this election matter, with the pushing of the Russiagate false flag hoax. By questioning this, yet having no 'curiosity' the media cast doubt. This is rapidly revealing individual 'journalists' as operatives for an 'invisible' (foreign and domestic) enemy. What will likely tie everything together is the financing and Syria. As it is alleged that even Assad used dominion. I've long been a fan of Assad in Syria, but always knew of the possibility that he was controlled oposition. This is how war works, all too often. But my point is that once all this is linked to our known enemies in the 9/11 wars against terror, the deep state operatives can be tried under military law, rather than civilian law. So, there are many strategic gains to not revealing the evidence yet. The Trump team seams to be very good with matters of strategic timing.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Timing is everything. Military planning at its finest!

 

[Microbeman]

Timing is everything. Military planning at its finest!

Fascism right around the corner; to address your earlier question.

 

[PollenChuckKing]

All investigations by doj or military are classified.
No, if the types of evidence she allegedly has are made public they would not be admissible
Sworn affidavits are public record at the state level
These guy's are not capable of understanding the difference and there are at least 2 seperate investigations into election fraud

 

[JKD]

Hi Hempy,

My post was a response to yours regarding confirmation of the raid. She has not confirmed it. Perhaps there may be evidence presented in future, but as yet nothing - it remains unsubstantiated.

I understand their approach so far as ‘proof by assertion’.

 

[redlaser]

For those who think Trump is a fascist: Ask yourself this...

If Trump were a fascist, wouldnt all the reporters who weaponize questions against him be "disapeared?"

Name one fascist world leader that allowed press to act against their own fascist interests. Name one fascist regime that did not have TOTAL(itarian) control over the media.

https://www.commondreams.org/views/...ways-trump-copying-hitlers-early-rhetoric-and

A leading civil rights lawyer outlines 20 ways Trump is copying Hitlers early rhetoric.

In trumps first divorce filings, his wife mentions he kept and transcribed Hitlers pre WW2 speeches in a locked cabinet.


1: Neither elected by majority vote.

2: Both found direct communication channels to their base.

3: Both blame others and divide in racial lines.

4: Both relentlessly demonize opponents

5: They increasingly attack objective truth

6: Their attacks on truth include science

7: Their lies blur reality, and supporters spread them

8: Both orchestrated mass rallies to show status

9: They embraced extreme nationalism

10: Both made closing borders a centerpiece

11: They embraced mass detention and deportation

12: Both used border closings to protect select industries

13: They cemented their rule by enriching the elites

14: Both rejected international norms

15: Both attacked domestic democratic processes

16: Both attacked the judiciary and rule of law

17: Both glorify military and demand loyal oaths

18: They proclaim unchecked power

19: They relentlessly attack mainstream media

20. Both relegate women to subordinate roles


*Cannavore posted this in the blatant election fraud thread 11/14

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Fascism right around the corner; to address your earlier question.

Not with the evidence against them. That's not fascism. It's justice. Call it 'social justice,' if it makes you feel better.

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Hi Hempy,

My post was a response to yours regarding confirmation of the raid. She has not confirmed it. Perhaps there may be evidence presented in future, but as yet nothing - it remains unsubstantiated.

I understand their approach so far as ‘proof by assertion’.

She has confirmed the raid here is a link to some coverage of the press conference.

https://youtu.be/AZGksPscmZ4

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

https://www.commondreams.org/views/...ways-trump-copying-hitlers-early-rhetoric-and

A leading civil rights lawyer outlines 20 ways Trump is copying Hitlers early rhetoric.

In trumps first divorce filings, his wife mentions he kept and transcribed Hitlers pre WW2 speeches in a locked cabinet.


1: Neither elected by majority vote.

2: Both found direct communication channels to their base.

3: Both blame others and divide in racial lines.

4: Both relentlessly demonize opponents

5: They increasingly attack objective truth

6: Their attacks on truth include science

7: Their lies blur reality, and supporters spread them

8: Both orchestrated mass rallies to show status

9: They embraced extreme nationalism

10: Both made closing borders a centerpiece

11: They embraced mass detention and deportation

12: Both used border closings to protect select industries

13: They cemented their rule by enriching the elites

14: Both rejected international norms

15: Both attacked domestic democratic processes

16: Both attacked the judiciary and rule of law

17: Both glorify military and demand loyal oaths

18: They proclaim unchecked power

19: They relentlessly attack mainstream media

20. Both relegate women to subordinate roles


*Cannavore posted this in the blatant election fraud thread 11/14

Most of this applies to Trumps opponents. Other points are mute, because they were for different reasons. One thing is that both were in a state of war. That is why there are some commonalities such as closing the border. Remember Hitler was a globalist.

 

[JKD]

She has confirmed the raid here is a link to some coverage of the press conference.

https://youtu.be/AZGksPscmZ4

Hi Hempy,

Listen to it again - no evidence presented, she just says “it’s true”. That is called ‘Proof by assertion’.

 

[Cannavore]

Remember Hitler was a globalist.

nope

 

[Cannavore]

MAGA & Fascism



[YOUTUBEIF]X4G7asMHqZ4[/YOUTUBEIF]

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

Hi Hempy,

Listen to it again - no evidence presented, she just says “it’s true”. That is called ‘Proof by assertion’.

So, you think she said it because...??

 

[Hempy McNoodle]

I wonder if it has anything to do with Esper getting fired.

 

[JKD]

So, you think she said it because...??

I think she said it because she is part of President Trumps legal team that is challenging President-elect Joe Bidens’ victory, and because a proportion of the population will take it as fact without proof. Whether she makes the same assertions in court without proof remains to be seen.

Regardless of her motivation, she has given no evidence. It remains an example of a proof by assertion fallacy. You’re using circular reasoning.

 

[redlaser]

Most of this applies to Trumps opponents. Other points are mute, because they were for different reasons. One thing is that both were in a state of war. That is why there are some commonalities such as closing the border. Remember Hitler was a globalist.

All of them apply to Trump though, if you disagree on any could you say why?
You should check that common org.story for the guys reasoning on each point, it’s not that long.

Cool tidbit about Trump transcribing Hitlers speeches though right?

You know, your initial question about trump not being fascist because he doesn’t harm journalists can be answered by saying not every attribute of fascism needs to be achieved to be considered a fascist situation.

If you want an detailed explanation of maga and fascism, the video Cannavore posted above is worthwhile