Such a loving new attitude
Here's a trump supporter on this site talking about viewing child porn in these very threads, as a reminder...
This is really not an honest argument. He's not "Viewing child pornography". He is looking at inappropriate content of major political significance(potentially anyway, and that is at least what he seems to believe). You surely must know that there is a world of difference between investigating something and seeking it out for your own personal reasons. Are you next going to say that SVU teams and judges/juries who view recordings of rapes and sexual abuse and whatnot all just "vewing" it.
Its fine to argue that you don't believe the photos/videos are legit, and its fine if you happen to personally believe any of the theories about all this; its just not ok to imply people are pedophiles when in fact their interest is exactly the opposite. Its not just rude, its completely dishonest and counterproductive.
Imho a militaristic empire run by corrupt, war mongering, morally degenerate politicians deserves ALL the havoc it can Possibly handle.
Live by the sword, die by the sword kind of thing.
Oh ya, love y’all
I was just proving a point.
None of you trumpets care about censorship, unless it affects you. You sure like to pretend you do, though.
Just like anything else.
read this...Here ya go. You clowns read.... well that's a stretch, ya don't read, you watch. Got it. Your outa luck then, she didn't do a you tube.
Sorry, I guess this doesn't concern you then.
For those of you that read, here's the last report by Rachel Bitcoffer. She's was the only researcher that correctly called, and properly modeled the disaster in 2016. That got her some notice, then she went and did it again in House Races in 2018(in all fairness she did miss the Senate though). Here's her final report on the 2020 race.
https://thecycle.news/news/september-2020-election-update
Check out the early voting numbers? We can do that, but sorry tRump voters, it isn't on You Tube. Again, we gotta do a little digging.... but you can do that here.
https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/index.html
And if you'd like me to summarize I can. We're gonna get close to 70% nationwide. Ten points plus over 2016. Landslide territory.
it's was the fucking weekend, you're the one so out of touch.they follow the Biden bus across the country lmao
don't these retards have jobs?
sorry, i'm not shifting away from Trump.Yup, time to shift the conversation to anything but trump now that it looks like there's going to be some democracy and justice administered.
You seem to be excessively infatuated with someone pointing out child sexual abuse
People who do this are usually trying to shed some deep subconscious guilt issues they have as a result
Of being a young victim/perpetrator themselves. .
I can only hope that my drawing attention to this deviant behavior will serve as a catalyst for you to purge any past or present involvement in any related
Acts of depravity with children
I would urge you to seek professional help... your absolution will not be found in the cofines of this site ..
Good luck sandy
Your pedo concerns originate with Q’s 2017 emergence, which coincide with Trumps/Epstein pedo stuff, making it a projection on your part.
This is really not an honest argument. He's not "Viewing child pornography". He is looking at inappropriate content of major political significance(potentially anyway, and that is at least what he seems to believe). You surely must know that there is a world of difference between investigating something and seeking it out for your own personal reasons. Are you next going to say that SVU teams and judges/juries who view recordings of rapes and sexual abuse and whatnot all just "vewing" it.
Its fine to argue that you don't believe the photos/videos are legit, and its fine if you happen to personally believe any of the theories about all this; its just not ok to imply people are pedophiles when in fact their interest is exactly the opposite. Its not just rude, its completely dishonest and counterproductive.