i understand the essense of the point you are trying to make, although i believe your analogy is amiss
credit scores are essentially big bankings way of portraying who the best/most reliable customers are... if you continue to commit to their banking system, you have a more favorable 'score'... why not, you are further bolstering their position as the "men who have the gold" and they lend on more favorable terms.... if you're all cash/no debt, the "men with gold" cannot profit from you and like many said, you are deemed "un-credit-worthy"
we have a right to our privacy and those layers are slowly being peeled away everyday, but our credit score/info is NOT actually owned by US, it's information kept ON us.
credit scores are essentially big bankings way of portraying who the best/most reliable customers are... if you continue to commit to their banking system, you have a more favorable 'score'... why not, you are further bolstering their position as the "men who have the gold" and they lend on more favorable terms.... if you're all cash/no debt, the "men with gold" cannot profit from you and like many said, you are deemed "un-credit-worthy"
we have a right to our privacy and those layers are slowly being peeled away everyday, but our credit score/info is NOT actually owned by US, it's information kept ON us.