You found somebody to follow. You can do better. Try some research papers. (I know. Somebody got paid for their work.)
-
ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest in October! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
howmany people here dont trust the vaccine or covid
- Thread starter Bio boy
- Start date
You found somebody to follow. You can do better. Try some research papers. (I know. Somebody got paid for their work.)
Omicron infections appear no less severe than Delta; COVID-19 lowers sperm count, motility
https://www.reuters.com/business/he...delta-covid-19-lowers-sperm-count-2021-12-20/
https://www.reuters.com/business/he...delta-covid-19-lowers-sperm-count-2021-12-20/
what is a motility?
btw it says on top in your article how its derived from non peer reviewed studies that are ongoing. now i seem to remember i got an ear full when i posted non peer reviewed studies, let alone interpretations of said studies
btw it says on top in your article how its derived from non peer reviewed studies that are ongoing. now i seem to remember i got an ear full when i posted non peer reviewed studies, let alone interpretations of said studies
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imp...-Report-49.pdf
Yes it states it hasn’t been peer reviewed yet. The article is very open about it. There is no deception. It is preliminary. Not presented as accepted facts, only as research and a preliminary report. It has to be read before it can be peer reviewed. It’s not just made up bullshit. This is the accepted method amongst real scientists and researchers of merit.
Pre peer review example :
Yes it states it hasn’t been peer reviewed yet. The article is very open about it. There is no deception. It is preliminary. Not presented as accepted facts, only as research and a preliminary report. It has to be read before it can be peer reviewed. It’s not just made up bullshit. This is the accepted method amongst real scientists and researchers of merit.
Pre peer review example :
The coronavirus infects fat cells, study suggests
https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-may-infect-fat-tissue
Key word is “suggests”.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.24.465626v1
It’s a “preprint” service. Waiting for review.
Perhaps MM can explain it better.
https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-may-infect-fat-tissue
Key word is “suggests”.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.24.465626v1
It’s a “preprint” service. Waiting for review.
Perhaps MM can explain it better.
Three Berries
Active member
you can do better that the MSM.
Oh shucks. Then read the background research for gods sake.
St. Phatty
Active member
Some of the Most Accurate data is NOT peer-reviewed.
e.g. a woman friend who committed suicide because she couldn't live with post-LASIK eye pain. Her pain was very real; the medical journals ignorred it.
e.g. Dr. Ryan Cole describing the step function increase in Endometriosis he sees in vaccinated women patients.
He is seeing raw data in the form of Biopsies in 2020 & 2021. It will be 5 years - if ever - before any "doctor" does an article for a peer-reviewed journal about related Vaccine complications.
https://odysee.com/ryan-cole-covid:9
A friend of yours?
Has his patients been referred to other physicians that can document or are banned YouTube videos his only other resource?
Three Berries
Active member
Banning videos on YouTube is Google censorship. Who controls the narrative and how to get around it? But using banned videos as a discreditor is pretty lame in these times.
Lactoferrin, diphenhydramine combination found to inhibit covid replication by 99%
Diphenhydramine, an antihistamine drug used for allergy symptoms, and lactoferrin, a protein found in cow and human milk, both hinder SARS-CoV-2 from replicating by up to 99 percent, the research team found.We found out why certain drugs are active against the virus that causes Covid-19,” said David A. Ostrov, Ph.D., an immunologist and associate professor in the UF College of Medicine’s department of pathology, immunology and laboratory medicines.
“Then, we found an antiviral combination that can be effective, economical, and has a long history of safety.”
Earlier research he conducted led Ostrov to conclude that diphenhydramine was potentially effective against the Fauci Flu all on its own. Now, thanks to recent meeting of scientists at the Global Virus Network’s COVID-19 Task Force, lactoferrin has been added to the repertoire.
“Like diphenhydramine, lactoferrin is available without a prescription,” reported SciTechDaily. “Ostrov thought about pairing it with diphenhydramine and ran with the idea.”
“In lab tests on human and monkey cells, the combination was particularly potent: Individually, the two compounds each inhibited SARS-CoV-2 virus replication by about 30%. Together, they reduced virus replication by 99%.”
Lactoferrin is such a powerful immune-boosting nutrient that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a pharmaceutical-pushing fake science entity, has advised mothers not to breastfeed their babies because breast milk contains high amounts of lactoferrin. The CDC would instead prefer that mothers feed their babies industrial baby formula, leaving their tiny immune systems damaged and diseased.
Diphenhydramine, an antihistamine drug used for allergy symptoms, and lactoferrin, a protein found in cow and human milk, both hinder SARS-CoV-2 from replicating by up to 99 percent, the research team found.We found out why certain drugs are active against the virus that causes Covid-19,” said David A. Ostrov, Ph.D., an immunologist and associate professor in the UF College of Medicine’s department of pathology, immunology and laboratory medicines.
“Then, we found an antiviral combination that can be effective, economical, and has a long history of safety.”
Earlier research he conducted led Ostrov to conclude that diphenhydramine was potentially effective against the Fauci Flu all on its own. Now, thanks to recent meeting of scientists at the Global Virus Network’s COVID-19 Task Force, lactoferrin has been added to the repertoire.
“Like diphenhydramine, lactoferrin is available without a prescription,” reported SciTechDaily. “Ostrov thought about pairing it with diphenhydramine and ran with the idea.”
“In lab tests on human and monkey cells, the combination was particularly potent: Individually, the two compounds each inhibited SARS-CoV-2 virus replication by about 30%. Together, they reduced virus replication by 99%.”
Lactoferrin is such a powerful immune-boosting nutrient that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a pharmaceutical-pushing fake science entity, has advised mothers not to breastfeed their babies because breast milk contains high amounts of lactoferrin. The CDC would instead prefer that mothers feed their babies industrial baby formula, leaving their tiny immune systems damaged and diseased.
There's plenty of horse shit out in the interwebs. Its ea of our responsibility to find the truth in anything we deem Horse shit.
There’s a rumor going around that the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) ADVISES DELAYED BREASTFEEDING TO BOOST VACCINE
EFFICACY.
Origins: In January 2015, a long-circulating rumor about purported recommendations made by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) about breastfeeding and vaccines began to spread anew. According to claims made on blogs and social media sites, the CDC recommended mothers stop breastfeeding in order to ensure vaccines dispensed to newborn babies were fully effective.
The rumor touched upon two often controversial baby care issues, vaccines and breastfeeding, and also tacitly suggested the CDC’s focus was profit rather than what’s best for babies. The claim referenced an October 2010 study published in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal titled “Inhibitory effect of breast milk on infectivity of live oral rotavirus vaccines.” At issue was the “Interpretation” portion on the study’s abstract, which stated:
The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by their infants at the time of immunization that could effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine.
Several blogs amplified the misinterpretation, entrenching the belief the “authorities” at the CDC had recommended a cessation of breastfeeding in order to ensure vaccine efficacy. The CDC has issued no guidelines whatsoever suggesting that breastfeeding should be delayed, either temporarily or at length, for any reason related to vaccine efficacy. Not only does the CDC not recommend mothers stop breastfeeding, that agency actively encourages nursing based on AAP guidance. The claim the CDC “recommended that mothers stop breastfeeding in order to increase the efficacy of vaccines” is a misleading one based on a 2010 study that simply observed the effects of breast milk on a single vaccine and neither made recommendations nor created guidelines about the cessation of breastfeeding in order to increase vaccine efficacy.
There’s a rumor going around that the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) ADVISES DELAYED BREASTFEEDING TO BOOST VACCINE
EFFICACY.
Origins: In January 2015, a long-circulating rumor about purported recommendations made by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) about breastfeeding and vaccines began to spread anew. According to claims made on blogs and social media sites, the CDC recommended mothers stop breastfeeding in order to ensure vaccines dispensed to newborn babies were fully effective.
The rumor touched upon two often controversial baby care issues, vaccines and breastfeeding, and also tacitly suggested the CDC’s focus was profit rather than what’s best for babies. The claim referenced an October 2010 study published in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal titled “Inhibitory effect of breast milk on infectivity of live oral rotavirus vaccines.” At issue was the “Interpretation” portion on the study’s abstract, which stated:
The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by their infants at the time of immunization that could effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine.
Several blogs amplified the misinterpretation, entrenching the belief the “authorities” at the CDC had recommended a cessation of breastfeeding in order to ensure vaccine efficacy. The CDC has issued no guidelines whatsoever suggesting that breastfeeding should be delayed, either temporarily or at length, for any reason related to vaccine efficacy. Not only does the CDC not recommend mothers stop breastfeeding, that agency actively encourages nursing based on AAP guidance. The claim the CDC “recommended that mothers stop breastfeeding in order to increase the efficacy of vaccines” is a misleading one based on a 2010 study that simply observed the effects of breast milk on a single vaccine and neither made recommendations nor created guidelines about the cessation of breastfeeding in order to increase vaccine efficacy.
Its a bullshit video with no backing evidence . Call it what you like. Pretty lame . Have you always been this vulnerable?
More unsubstantiated bullshit. Your quote is an outright lie.
CDC
While human milk provides the most complete form of nutrition for infants, including premature and sick newborns, there are rare exceptions when human milk or breastfeeding is not recommended. Additional information about these conditions is available by clicking the links provided.
Is everyone getting their booster before Christmas, just take a look to Denmark first
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/theres-something-antigenic-in-denmark
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/theres-something-antigenic-in-denmark
The cat? Whatever. Another opinion.
US Army Creates Single Vaccine Against All COVID & SARS Variants, Researchers Say
NEW - US Army has created a single "Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle" vaccine (SpFN) against "all existing COVID & SARS variants," researchers say.
The vaccine is a "soccer ball-shaped protein with 24 faces to attach the spikes" and human trials are already underway.
https://www.defenseone.com/technolo...ctive-against-all-covid-sars-variants/360089/
NEW - US Army has created a single "Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle" vaccine (SpFN) against "all existing COVID & SARS variants," researchers say.
The vaccine is a "soccer ball-shaped protein with 24 faces to attach the spikes" and human trials are already underway.
https://www.defenseone.com/technolo...ctive-against-all-covid-sars-variants/360089/
Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle (SpFN) COVID-19 vaccine
Nanoparticles!!!!! EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKKKK! Humans are turning into AI warriors after Phase I trials are canceled!
Oh never mind. I see it is created by the US Army. Patriots who have not been jabbed or contracted Covid-19 are lining up for Phase II. We all trust our military.
Nanoparticles!!!!! EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKKKK! Humans are turning into AI warriors after Phase I trials are canceled!
Oh never mind. I see it is created by the US Army. Patriots who have not been jabbed or contracted Covid-19 are lining up for Phase II. We all trust our military.
A SARS-CoV-2 ferritin nanoparticle vaccine elicits protective immune responses in nonhuman primates
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.abi5735
interesting how it took them 2 years just to get to the end of stage 1 human trials, but some how pfizer did the whole thing in 4 months.
