@ maree: thanks for posting that quote, much appreciated
So after reading what mustafunk and maree posted i felt compelled to do some reading on the topic of haze. I have read the "questions for sam the skunkman on orginal haze" before, but read the whole thing again, as well as some other threads. Ouch that hurt! too much negativity! but it was also very informative and reminded me of things i had forgotten and taught me things i didn't know yet...
a lot of what we talk about here has been covered in depth (big surprise) and there are differing opinions on the relation of the various haze lines, here some quotes to illustrate these standpoints:
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=4319593&postcount=35
source: http://www.mrnice.nl/forum/18662-post18.html
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=1541042&postcount=121
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=1537918&postcount=47
Seems like the controversy is not only whether othaze and original haze are genetically related, but even whether different seeds provided by sam have different genetic make up. It gets even more complicated as we go back further. Where did sam get his haze seeds? From the haze brothers who originally created "haze". I always took that to mean that he had access to the actual seeds / seed line, but in the article that bigherb published in TY (and that sam suposedly confirmed as being accurate) a different picture is painted:
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=4785776&postcount=1011
the wording "collected" in the following quote seems to fit in:
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=1539868&postcount=110
It also seems pretty clear that haze rather quickly became a generic term for (poly)hybrid sativa lines (or narrow leaf drug type indica for the smarty pants - i think sativa is a fine term, worked well for the underground farmers for decades, everybody knows what is meant within the context, language is descriptive not normative - might seem irrelevant for our topic but really isn't ). The fact that sam called his haze "original haze" implies that there were other non original hazes.
this quote from "origins of the species" by Robert Clarke where he calls big sur holy weed a haze also ilustrates this point:
source: http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4721.html
The post of Oldtimer that maree posted also reafirms this.
So at the point that sam collected his haze seeds there probably were already a variety of haze lines in existence, but he and other growers from santa cruz are sure they were the first to use the haze term and thus have the "original haze". But even though they may have coined the term haze, they had no control over how language is used and haze became a category rather than a strain-name. Remember: language is descriptive not normative, if it were normative, things would be straight forward: only plants that are directly descended from the original hybrid would be haze. But as it is descriptive, any plant that expressed certain traits could be and was called haze.
Does that mean that haze = sativa polyhybrid? In my opinion not, the way we use the term "haze" today i would not use it to describe destroyer or reina madre for example (both 100% sativa poly hybrids) They do not share these "certain traits" that make a haze haze.
So what are the traits that make a haze a haze? To define that we would have to observe the traits found in the plants that are with certainity derived from the original hybrid (i.e. every haze that came to us through sam in one way or another), but even here we have controversy:
which might be explained by this quote:
so are hazy traits only those found in the f1? or everything that can be found in the different lines derived from the original hybrid? the common usage of language tells us that the latter one is true. A lot of people view incense / frankincense aromas as an essential haze trait:
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=2288931&postcount=31
sams descriptions of the original hybrid does not include this trait:
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=1539868&postcount=110
whereas another description mentions the incense smell:
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=4785776&postcount=1011
It seems that incense / frankincense aromas were more of a recessive trait in the original hybrid but got more pronounced in some of the lines that developed from there.
It's interesting that it is so hard to pin down which traits contribute to classify a plant as haze, while everybody who has grown haze will recognize it immediately as such. A testament to the usefullness of "haze" as a category, imo.
What to make of this all?
Well, the normative approach (i.e. only what came though sam is really haze) won't ever work as there is a realistic possibility that others have saved / used seeds from the same source (hundreds of kilos were sold). Furthermore haze is used for other plants for decades too, so there's no point in insisting that they are really not haze because collective usage of language has made them "haze".
For me that means that there is absolutely no point in arguing about these stories (none of which is the truth - truth will always escape the mantle of language), the only productive discussion for me could be to define what traits are considered "hazy" and how essential their presence in a plant is for calling the plant "haze" and how this positions a plant to the original hybrid.
honestly after seeing so much superfluous fighting in the haze threads i think i should have avoided the haze name alltogether and called my plants "altar boy's choice" hybrids
So after reading what mustafunk and maree posted i felt compelled to do some reading on the topic of haze. I have read the "questions for sam the skunkman on orginal haze" before, but read the whole thing again, as well as some other threads. Ouch that hurt! too much negativity! but it was also very informative and reminded me of things i had forgotten and taught me things i didn't know yet...
a lot of what we talk about here has been covered in depth (big surprise) and there are differing opinions on the relation of the various haze lines, here some quotes to illustrate these standpoints:
Anyway, the line I work with (and Positronic, and Flyingdutchmen, and Seedsman, and everybody else who's ever described/offered "Original Haze", including this early description from Sam), and what Mr. Nice works with, are two different animals - but both good imo.
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=4319593&postcount=35
Well since I had the chance of sampling Dubi's ot1 Hazes , and most of the different phenos , I have to say that there was a strong resemblance between them and the Haze I m familiar with from MNS and other sources. Real HazeBros Haze or not.. , it looked , smelled , smoked and tasted similar. I wonder what Shanti would think about the ot1 Hazes too after sampling them. I liked them myself but I cant really judge them till I grow em myself and I have yet to grow 'Sams' pure Haze versions.
source: http://www.mrnice.nl/forum/18662-post18.html
I think that OT1´s and TomHill´s Hazes are basically the same,but worked in a different way,just my opinion
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=1541042&postcount=121
If you grow and smoke it you will recognize it as a Haze line. Aromas, type of effect, traits found... but I cannot say where these lines come from or if they are a segregation of old Haze jobs or Sam jobs... but definatelly upon my opinion there must be a common old point where they came from.
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=1537918&postcount=47
Seems like the controversy is not only whether othaze and original haze are genetically related, but even whether different seeds provided by sam have different genetic make up. It gets even more complicated as we go back further. Where did sam get his haze seeds? From the haze brothers who originally created "haze". I always took that to mean that he had access to the actual seeds / seed line, but in the article that bigherb published in TY (and that sam suposedly confirmed as being accurate) a different picture is painted:
Now, Sam the skunk man has without doubt brought original haze stock to Holland, but in exactly what form, pure or hybrid, is unknown. G said that he did not give SAMS haze stock, But acknowledges he did live on the block and did some trimming. Therefore there is the possibility he collected seed working with, or smoking the varieties.
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=4785776&postcount=1011
the wording "collected" in the following quote seems to fit in:
I have not worked Original Haze as much as tried to save it, I collected as much seed as I could in the early 70's grew them and did free pollinations and did minimal selection to ensure I saved as many genes as I could.
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=1539868&postcount=110
It also seems pretty clear that haze rather quickly became a generic term for (poly)hybrid sativa lines (or narrow leaf drug type indica for the smarty pants - i think sativa is a fine term, worked well for the underground farmers for decades, everybody knows what is meant within the context, language is descriptive not normative - might seem irrelevant for our topic but really isn't ). The fact that sam called his haze "original haze" implies that there were other non original hazes.
this quote from "origins of the species" by Robert Clarke where he calls big sur holy weed a haze also ilustrates this point:
...
The most interesting of these is S.A.G.E., which is a Haze-based variety from the coastal mountains of Big Sur, California.
...
source: http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4721.html
The post of Oldtimer that maree posted also reafirms this.
So at the point that sam collected his haze seeds there probably were already a variety of haze lines in existence, but he and other growers from santa cruz are sure they were the first to use the haze term and thus have the "original haze". But even though they may have coined the term haze, they had no control over how language is used and haze became a category rather than a strain-name. Remember: language is descriptive not normative, if it were normative, things would be straight forward: only plants that are directly descended from the original hybrid would be haze. But as it is descriptive, any plant that expressed certain traits could be and was called haze.
Does that mean that haze = sativa polyhybrid? In my opinion not, the way we use the term "haze" today i would not use it to describe destroyer or reina madre for example (both 100% sativa poly hybrids) They do not share these "certain traits" that make a haze haze.
So what are the traits that make a haze a haze? To define that we would have to observe the traits found in the plants that are with certainity derived from the original hybrid (i.e. every haze that came to us through sam in one way or another), but even here we have controversy:
Anyway, the line I work with (and Positronic, and Flyingdutchmen, and Seedsman, and everybody else who's ever described/offered "Original Haze", including this early description from Sam), and what Mr. Nice works with, are two different animals - but both good imo.
which might be explained by this quote:
OHaze was fairly consistant as F1's but by the time it was f5 and above it segregated out into many different related lines.
so are hazy traits only those found in the f1? or everything that can be found in the different lines derived from the original hybrid? the common usage of language tells us that the latter one is true. A lot of people view incense / frankincense aromas as an essential haze trait:
... certain common traits I observed compared to the other known Haze lines...
My point was I dont know where these seeds originated (said before posible "segregation or offspring of") but looks, tastes, smells and hits like what we know like haze. Wish I could know and find line reponsable of such inciense aroma if it was just one!.. never knew exactly where should have come from... colombia? nepal? thailand? but only found it in all these what we call Haze lines
best
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=2288931&postcount=31
sams descriptions of the original hybrid does not include this trait:
Fruity, Sweet & Sour, Rootbeer, Cola, Chocolate, very /resinous hashy smell and taste.
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=1539868&postcount=110
whereas another description mentions the incense smell:
Later, a more accurate description of each variety was given. The first being Magenta, which those in the inner-circle knew as the “Rootbeer pheno``, and the rest of the world knew as “purple haze``. Then, there was the “Gold`` which was known to carry musky sandlewood and pine traits. In actuality it smelt like catpiss late in flower, and before a cure. “Blue`` and “silver`` were of the Spicy Sweet peppery type, and silver was considered strongest- all of them had a deep rich lingering after-taste.
source: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=4785776&postcount=1011
It seems that incense / frankincense aromas were more of a recessive trait in the original hybrid but got more pronounced in some of the lines that developed from there.
It's interesting that it is so hard to pin down which traits contribute to classify a plant as haze, while everybody who has grown haze will recognize it immediately as such. A testament to the usefullness of "haze" as a category, imo.
What to make of this all?
Well, the normative approach (i.e. only what came though sam is really haze) won't ever work as there is a realistic possibility that others have saved / used seeds from the same source (hundreds of kilos were sold). Furthermore haze is used for other plants for decades too, so there's no point in insisting that they are really not haze because collective usage of language has made them "haze".
For me that means that there is absolutely no point in arguing about these stories (none of which is the truth - truth will always escape the mantle of language), the only productive discussion for me could be to define what traits are considered "hazy" and how essential their presence in a plant is for calling the plant "haze" and how this positions a plant to the original hybrid.
honestly after seeing so much superfluous fighting in the haze threads i think i should have avoided the haze name alltogether and called my plants "altar boy's choice" hybrids