What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Have you looked at the North Pole lately?

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
conversely, without that satellite data we wouldn't be able to monitor the ice growing and/or expanding in thickness or in area without that physical presence.


that gap in coverage would confound the models currently used to forecast and we would essentially be flying blind.


http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/7/eaat6025



it could also be used to hide or disguise the change in the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation gyre that appears to be cooling...


"Because PDO cycles last 25 to 30 years, Easterbrook expects the cooling trend to continue for another 2 decades or so. Easterbrook, in fact, documents 40 such alternating periods of warming and cooling over the past 500 years, with similar data going back 15,000 years. He further expects the flipping of the ADO to add to the current downward trend."


https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterf...-alarmists-the-earth-is-cooling/#169c65cd3de0
 

TychoMonolyth

Boreal Curing
Fake news from 1912

A 14 August 1912 article from a New Zealand newspaper contained a brief story about how burning coal might produce future warming by adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere:

"The furnaces of the world are now burning about 2,000,000,000 tons of coal a year. When this is burned, uniting with oxygen, it adds about 7,000,000,000 tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere yearly. This tends to make the air a more effective blanket for the earth and to raise its temperature. The effect may be considerable in a few centuries."
picture.php
 
U

Ununionized

It's not possible for the GHGs to warm the planet they cool it.

The GHGs are the sole class gases responsible for reduction of 22 to 23% of all otherwise available warming firelight spectra from the sun,

never reaching the Earth.

When you look at charts of sunlight top of atmosphere vs at surface, 29% of alll warming firelight spectra from the sun never reach the planet, and the COOLING GHGs are responsible for MOST of that.

It's why they are nearly the sole class gases listed on any charts showing sunlight top of atmosphere vs the surface.

These 29% are immediately taken off the top of global atmospheric temperature * * IN FULL AND WITHOUT ANY OTHER CONSIDERATION: THEY'RE GONE.* *

Not to 'warming' not to 'Magical places' they're GONE and INSTANTLY reduce the TOTAL planet TEMPERATURE by 29% TOTAL,


and like I told ya the COOLING GHGs are responsible for the VAST MAJORITY of this.

You're being SYSTEMATICALLY LIED to with the obvious truth RIGHT THERE by the EXACT SAME ORGANIZATION that told your grandpa, POT is like HEROIN so WE HAVE to SHOOT PEOPLE who are AROUND it.

Furthermore CO2 has lower energy handling capacity per mole than standard Air itself: another bald-faced lie you're told- that addition of CO2 to air can lead to warming.

ADDING CO2 to AIR, causes COOLING. You're simply being lied to by the government about ALL of if.

The COLD nitroge-oxygen atmospheric bath is not HEATING the PLANET.

There is no 33 degrees ''GHG Effect'' HANSEN LIED and CLAIMED IT'S POSSIBLE to SOLVE for GAS TEMPERATURES using SOLELY STEFAN-BOLTZMANN processing which does *NOT HAVE provision for SOLVING the 33 DEGREES' COMPRESSION WARMING our ATMOSPHERE'S WEIGHT CREATES*

and which IS WHY THE GAS LAWS ARE NEEDED in the FIRST PLACE: SOLIDS and INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS do not HAVE a COMPRESSION WARMING COMPONENT TO THEIR TEMEPRATURES.

There's no such thing as a COLD NITROGEN/OXYGEN BATH that is HEATING the SUN WARMED OBJECTS IN it.

The atmosphere is MANY degrees COLDER than the PLANET and the very FIRST thing done in solving it's temperature is to

TAKE AWAY the 22, 23% COOLING by GHG REFRACTION to space,
along with the remaining 6 or 7 %

in accounting the TOTAL SUNLIGHT COUNTED warming the SURFACE.

Only hicks who think you're so stupid you'll buy a story about a COLD NITROXY BATH WARMING THINGS PUT IN IT will try to mislead you but LOOK:

They also have ON the BOOKS that POT is like HEROIN and WORSE for you than METHYL AMPHETAMINE: that there is ZERO MEDICAL USE for POT, and that you would be better off on METH.

IT'S
ON
THE
BOOKS
in
THE U.S. RIGHT NOW
and THEY SPREAD that LYING SHIT to 129 NATIONS at one point,
(or whatever the number was, there are levels of prohibition about it)

and have the ENTIRE PLANET KILLING H.U.N.D.R.E.D.S. of T.H.O.U.S.A.N.D.S. of P.E.O.P.L.E. YEARLY, because

THEY'RE FORCED ONTO O.P.I.O.I.D.S. because the

SAME ''SCIENTIFIC'' ORGS: ACADEMICS and GOV'MTS

Have said NO MORE RESEARCH is NEEDED,

the SIGNTS IS SOWND, and

''WE ALL HAVE TO GET ON OPIOIDS so POT DOESN'T MAKE SOME PEOPLE GET on OPIOIDS.''

Does THAT sound like fuckin SCIENCE to you? ''WE HAS GOT TO GET ON OPIOIDS CAUSE DEVLISH GRASSINESS MAKES YEW GIT REEFUR MADNISS'' - does that sound like SCIENCE to YOU?


wELL, IT'S WHY YOU'RE IN HERE ANONYMOUSLY, PRACTICALLY SPEAKING, O.N. THE R.U.N. FROM T.H.E. LAW B.E.C.A.U.S.E. YOU WON'T ADMIT,

that POT is like HEROIN
and the WHOLE WORLD HAS to get on OPIOIDS
so POT doesn't LEAD them to OPIOIDS.

Now. You go find me another COLD NITROGEN-OXYGEN BATH that's WARMING an OBJECT it's COOLING and YOU'VE got SCIENCE.

OTHERWISE

YOU'RE in POT'S LIKE HEROIN country.

That goes for every last fraud barking HILLBILLY who THINKS HE'S GONNA SHOW US ONE:

WHEN YOU SHOW THE WORLD A SINGLE COLD NITROGEN/OXYGEN BATH that WARMS the OBJECTS it CHILLS - you're not in


''POT'S LIEK HEROWYN CAWSE SIGNTSIE FELLURS AWL OVUR THA WERLD, SEZ SOE!"

That's the class of ludicrous bullshit you're being told is the scientific gospel truth. THIS COLD NITROGEN BATH is a HEATER and YEW DUN MAKIN THE SKY git HOT frum YEWSIN YEW sum FIAR!!''

No, which is why they claim ''THAIR AINT NO SPEARMINT SEZ IT AIN'T TREW!''

and ''THA DUH BAYTE is OVUR!''

That's what they tell CHILDREN they SHOT to DEATH for having

a JOINT in their ashtray.



Fake news from 1912

A 14 August 1912 article from a New Zealand newspaper contained a brief story about how burning coal might produce future warming by adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere:

"The furnaces of the world are now burning about 2,000,000,000 tons of coal a year. When this is burned, uniting with oxygen, it adds about 7,000,000,000 tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere yearly. This tends to make the air a more effective blanket for the earth and to raise its temperature. The effect may be considerable in a few centuries."
View Image
 
U

Ununionized

And like I said: the VERY FIRST COLD NITROGEN/OXYGEN BATH you SHOW US ALL WARMING the LIGHT-WARMED ROCK it's WASHING - you're not a fraud barking lunatic too stupid to know there's

NO SUCH THING as a COLD NITROGEN BATH WARMING the ROCK it's chilling.

And the MAIN REASON the entire PLANET is 29% COOLER

is because of the GHGs COMPLETE REMOVAL of 22% of total otherwise-available warming

firelight spectra from the SUN.

Which is why they're almost the SOLE CLASS GASES SHOWN REMOVING SUNLIGHT from EARTH on

ALLLLLLLLLLLLLL CHARTS, of SUNLIGHT: TOP-of-ATMOSPHERE vs AT the SURFACE.

They show a little bit of ozone and a little bit of oxygen rayleigh scattering which is what gives us daytime blue-sky conditions, BUT THE VAST MAJORITY of ALL COOLING taking place BECAUSE of the ATMOSPHERE

BEFORE
you EVEN start COUNTING:

is the COOLING GREEN HOUSE GASES' REMOVAL of their OWN 22, 23% RIGHT off the TOP.

You COUNT UP the GHG COOLING along with the other gases' COOLING

when you DISCOVER HOW MUCH ENERGY WARMS the SURFACE to BEGIN your CALCULATIONS.

Your CHURCH HANDLERS don't TELL YOU THAT DO THEY.

They don't EXPLAIN to you WHY the COOLING GHGs are nearly the SOLE CLASS GASES LISTED in

ALL
CHARTS
ON the PLANET

as BEING PREDOMINANT in that 29% COOLING.
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
if the planet is cooling then why was it a record breaking 130* in the middle east a few years ago? why is each year that passes the hottest year on record, hotter than the last? why do we have a net loss in glacier ice (land ice)?
 
U

Ununionized

Like I said, WHEN YOU CAN'T SHOW THE WORLD A SINGLE INSTANCE of a COLD FLUID BATH WARMING objects PLACED IN IT:

and YOU'RE SAT THERE AND SHOWN HOW to CALCULATE the TEMPERATURE of the ATMOSPHERE

and there's 29% COOLING RIGHT off the TOP

and you're still barkin ''IT'S a HEEDUR IT'S uh HEEDURE, GUVURMINT MIN DUN SED SOE!"

YOU're BARKING anti science trash WORSE than POT'S like HEROIN.

And ''POT'S LIKE HEROIN'' is the reason MOST of you are forced to join WEBSITES ABOUT POT, ANONYMOUSLY, around the WORLD.

YOU'RE not gonna TELL people in here that POT'S like HEROIN but it's the LAW.

And the REASON it's THE LAW is because GOVERNMENT F***s PROVIDED the ''CRITICAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY PEER REVIEWED SCIENCE'' to

PROVE that - ''AT TAIR POT'S JIST LAIK HEROYN YaW!''

In 1858, FAR MORE than HALF of the PLANET believed ''THA SIGNTS SEZ, THIM COLURD FOLKS AIN'T GOT NO SOULS, THAY AIN'T EVUN RiLLiE HEWMUN!!

Thay has got a DEVLISH SASSINESS what MAKES em NO GOOD fur NUTHIN but EVIL.

in 1938 the SAME GOVERNMENT ''SIGNTISTS'' WUZZA tellin people ''THIM DEVIL WEADS HAS got uh... DEVIILISH GRASSINESS what makes it NO GOOD fur NUTHIN but EVIL.

In 2018 that SAME DEMOCRAT PARTY is TELLING YOU ''THIM GREAN HOWS GASSIS has gotta...DEVLISH GAISSINESS TWO EM what MAKES um NO GOOD fur NUTHIN but EVIL.

Thay dun mayde uh COALED NITCHURGIN BATH uh HEEDUR cawse YEW YEWSED YEW, sum FIRE!

THEY WERE LYING EVERY f***g TIME.

SAME BATWING DEMOCRAT PARTY DESPERATION to ROB and STEAL YOU BLIND,
MURDER YOU,
DESTROY YOU,
by LYING to YOU about SCIENCE,

SAME BATWING CONTORTION of SCIENCE into PUREST FRAUD,

same BATWING METHODS of USING HATRED to DARKEN SCIENCE.

END of f***n STORY.

Until one of you SCIENCE DARKENING BATWINGS shows us all a COLD NITROGEN/OXYGEN BATH that warms,

WARMER
LIGHT warmed ROCKS put in it,

the SAME nitrogen bath REMOVES 29% of the warming light from temperature of,

OFF the TOP.

People who spread that kind of looptard sh**
are called ''science darkening hicks.''

Desperate, illiterate, innumerate, science-darkening water boys and girls for the same organization that FOUNDED the KU KLUX KLAN under the guise that ''THIM COLURDS AIN'T HEWMAN, THA SIGNTS SEZ SO!''

The SAME organization that tells minorities everywhere, 'WE'RE YOAR CHAMPEEYUNS uv SIGNTS!'' are the SAME ONES who MADE POT ILLEGAL.

And used the excuse ''IT HAS a DEVILISH GRAISSINESS TWO IT what MAKES it DEVUL WEAD and it gives peepul REEFUR MADNISS!''

SAME
POLITICAL PARTY

SAME LYING PUREST SCIENTIFIC FRAUD,

BOTH TIMES.
 

Hermanthegerman

Well-known member
Veteran
Here in Northwest and Eastern Germany, we´ve got the hottest summer ever. In my area no real rain since 10-12 weeks. I am 52 and can´t remember such a heat over a so long time. It´s the same in whole middle Europe and in Spain and Portugal the heat is brutal.


I think this is the future and it makes me scary.


Yesterday I saw a documentation about the Alps, not to speak about the dying glaciers, another great problem is the alpine Permafrost. The Permafrost holds the mountains and stone together. Parts of the mountains break and roll down to the Valleys and this is happening more often than ever.


I am glad, that I am dead in 30 years. I don´t want to know what is happening than,.....


I am afraid, that we are over the point of no return.
 

TychoMonolyth

Boreal Curing
if the planet is cooling then why was it a record breaking 130* in the middle east a few years ago? why is each year that passes the hottest year on record, hotter than the last? why do we have a net loss in glacier ice (land ice)?

Because they read it on the internet.
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
i'm not reading or responding to that drivel. type like a normal person.

you have to be normal to act normal. it is simpler to keep sticking up the same straw man & knocking him over repeatedly. he is not going to respond in any lucid fashion. if both polar ice caps completely disappear & Miami & New Orleans are submerged, and summer temps average around 120 deg. F in Alaska, he is going to say the same thing then, too...i'm starting to think he is Alex Jones, the infowars cretin in disguise.
 
U

Ununionized

Actually the internet is where YOU were educated, MY PROFESSIONAL CAREER as ATMOSPHERIC CHEMIST started in 1967 and

WHEN YOU SHOW US ALL ANOTHER COLD NITROGEN BATH that HEATS what it's CHILLING,
*YOU*

won't be the one educated in the public schools so you could graduate 30% behind home-schooled dino-riding Pentecostal fundies from the Ozarks.

My degree in atmospheric-radiation related Electronic Engineering was granted to me in 1989. Probably before you were born to grow up and swear the cold nitrogen-oxygen fluid bath atmosphere is a ''big ol' giant heedur yaw!"

SHOW US ALL ONE INSTANCE of a COLD NITROGEN BATH WARMING SOMETHING or you're as dumb as you seem.

Try reading a book instead of the internet.
 
U

Ununionized

Same thing goes for you. You either show us ONE INSTANCE of a COLD NITROGEN/OXYGEN BATH warming what's put in it or YOU'RE

so dumb you thought a COLD NITROGEN BATH is a HEEDURE cawse ''signtsite fellurs frum tha guvurmint dun SED SO YAW!"

WE'LL ALL WAIT.

YOU SHOW US that COLD NITROXY BATH that HEATED what it CHILLED or you're as FAKE as what you're sayin SHOWS YOU to BE.

We'll all wait, YOU explain to these ADULTS, how a COLD NITROGEN ATMOSPHERIC BATH is ''uh big ol' HEEDUR YAW!"

Go ahead nobody wants to hear sh*** for brains INSULT based on URGENT WISH a COLD NITROGEN BATH was a HEATER.

SHOW us all you even know what LAW governs the temperatures of gases hence - ATMOSPHERES.

TEN BUCKS says YOU CAN'T NAME THAT LAW if your REPUTATION DEPENDS ON it.

Cause it does,

AND YOU'RE TOO DUMB to DO IT.

Everybody wanna bet?

YOU'RE up at BAT:

NAME the LAW of PHYSICS that GOVERNS temperatures of GASES.

When YOU CAN'T DO THAT

it's because you're so DUMB,

a buncha GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES can tell you a COLD NITROGEN ATMOSPHERE is a HEATER - and YOU'LL BELIEVE IT.


you have to be normal to act normal. it is simpler to keep sticking up the same straw man & knocking him over repeatedly. he is not going to respond in any lucid fashion. if both polar ice caps completely disappear & Miami & New Orleans are submerged, and summer temps average around 120 deg. F in Alaska, he is going to say the same thing then, too...i'm starting to think he is Alex Jones, the infowars cretin in disguise.
 

TychoMonolyth

Boreal Curing
Actually the internet is where YOU were educated, MY PROFESSIONAL CAREER as ATMOSPHERIC CHEMIST started in 1967 and

WHEN YOU SHOW US ALL ANOTHER COLD NITROGEN BATH that HEATS what it's CHILLING,
*YOU*

won't be the one educated in the public schools so you could graduate 30% behind home-schooled dino-riding Pentecostal fundies from the Ozarks.

My degree in atmospheric-radiation related Electronic Engineering was granted to me in 1989. Probably before you were born to grow up and swear the cold nitrogen-oxygen fluid bath atmosphere is a ''big ol' giant heedur yaw!"

SHOW US ALL ONE INSTANCE of a COLD NITROGEN BATH WARMING SOMETHING or you're as dumb as you seem.
Lol. I have 2 advanced degrees, belong to the MIT alumni club, and got Alan Guth pissed to the eyeballs once after a speaking engagement. Can you beat that?
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
Here in Northwest and Eastern Germany, we´ve got the hottest summer ever. In my area no real rain since 10-12 weeks. I am 52 and can´t remember such a heat over a so long time. It´s the same in whole middle Europe and in Spain and Portugal the heat is brutal.


I think this is the future and it makes me scary.


Yesterday I saw a documentation about the Alps, not to speak about the dying glaciers, another great problem is the alpine Permafrost. The Permafrost holds the mountains and stone together. Parts of the mountains break and roll down to the Valleys and this is happening more often than ever.


I am glad, that I am dead in 30 years. I don´t want to know what is happening than,.....


I am afraid, that we are over the point of no return.


global atmospheric events




Imaggeo on Mondays: The warming

Laura Roberts-Artal August 3, 2015


The warming. Credit: Martin Jucker (distributed via imaggeo.egu.eu)

Events of meteorological significance, such as thunderstorms, hurricanes, cyclones, jet streams and global-scale circulations can be described by a general term: atmospheric dynamics. When it comes to it, atmospheric dynamics deals with nothing more than air, which, in truth, is very difficult to directly observe, (with the exception of clouds and precipitation). This makes the study of atmospheric dynamics problematic!
So how is it that we know so much about weather systems and atmospheric dynamics? Scientists are able to observe changes in the temperature, pressure, density (or thermodynamic state to use the technical term), and the general state of the air, as well as changes in its motion, including its direction and speed (ie the winds). But even if the observations can be made, visualising the dynamic events still remains a problem.
That is where rendering – the process by which an image can be generated from 2D or 3D data – comes in. From simple line plots over two-dimensional contours, to three-dimensional visualization and even animations, every type of rendering has its own place and utility in atmospheric science research.
Stratospheric Sudden Warmings (SSWs) are prime examples of global scale atmospheric events that cannot be observed directly, as neither clouds, nor precipitation, nor any other visible structures are involved. SSWs are events where the stratospheric polar vortex –a persistent large-scale cyclone which circles the poles – breaks down within a few days, and strong anomalies can be measured in many variables, such as temperature, wind, and its height position relative to sea level and adjusted for the effects of gravity.
Today’s Imaggeo on Mondays image is a rendering of the SSWs and its associated height anomalies on February 23, 1979, (taken from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ERA-Interim reanalysis dataset). From the image, Martin Jucker, a researcher at New York University, was able to show that the 1979 event spanned the entire polar and subpolar regions and throughout the stratosphere.
“Not seen in this picture (as it is a temporal snapshot) is the influence such SSWs can have even on the state of the atmosphere at surface levels. Indeed, there can be implications throughout the atmospheric column all the way to the surface, with the jet streams being perturbed and prolonged periods of unusual weather observed in mid- to high latitudes,” explains Martin.
This is a great example of how three-dimensional renderings can give intuitive understanding of the internal structure of important global scale atmospheric events. They can help appreciate the spatial extent of the anomalies generated throughout the atmosphere. Phenomena which are not visible without the help of computer visualization techniques can be categorized and even defined!



https://blogs.egu.eu/geolog/tag/global-atmospheric-events/

better to understand the physics than to deny them.
 
U

Ununionized

Yeah - and you think a cold nitrogen-oxygen bath is a heater, too.

You don't have a degree that left you capable of telling whether it's possible for a cold nitrogen bath to be a heater or not. It's not like you're gonna bullshit your way out of this.

Lol. I have 2 advanced degrees, belong to the MIT alumni club, and got Alan Guth pissed to the eyeballs once after a speaking engagement. Can you beat that?
 
U

Ununionized

If you have two advanced degrees, and you claim that's your defense for thinking the cold nitroxy atmospheric bath's a heater, then tell me the name of the gas law governing gas temperatures,

and tell me what happens when you don't use that law, to resolve final temperature of our planet Earth. WHAT'S the MANDATORY ERROR if you FAIL to USE the LAW that - you can't name?

In solving for Earth's temeperature, Mr. "Magical Gassiness dun turn't uh cold nitroxy bath in two uh HeeDuR, cawse fantsie guvurmint fellurs dun sed it did,"

what is mandatory error that occurs when someone claims they're solving for the temperature of our planet's surface and atmosphere, but they don't use that law?

You either know this or you're as dumb about it as I'm saying it's easy to show, you are.

This is where you start talking and talking, and when you stop, you had BETTER have a craftier way of saying, ''And that's why a cold nitroxy bath, is a heedur!'' in a way SO convincing, that everybody who can figure out ''cold nitrogen bath'' from ''heater'' is gonna know what UTTER bullshoot what you say is.

You show these people another cold nitrogen bath,
that heats the object it's turbulently conduction chilling,

or you're as dumb as you're starting to feel, trying to find a SINGLE instance of a cold bath being a heater, in all thermodynamics.

We'll wait,
you go get that OTHER cold nitrogen/oxygen bath, that actually heats what it's chilling, and be prepared to discuss the principle of a cold nitrogen bath being a heater at length with me and whoever else comes along.

Come on, it's just explaining how a cold bath's a heater.

Let's all guess now you're gonna try to tell us the green house gases warm the planet?

They're cold too, and are responsible for the vast majority of all that light that strikes the atmosphere - but is refracted to space.

No, it's not all absorbed, and in fact only a tiny fraction of it's absorbed, it's refracted to space through a variety of mechanisms but by FAR - by FAR the predominant group responsible for that INITIAL COOLING removing 29% of total sunlight from surface/atmospheric temperature calculations OFF the TOP is the GHGs.

That's why, they're nearly the SOLE class gases in ANY of these charts you, or anybody else is ever gonna come up with, even LISTED on those CHARTS of ''Sunlight, top of atmosphere vs at the surface.''

You need to turn "two advanced degrees'' into ''And that's how the cold nitrogen oxygen bath, many degrees COLDER than the planet surface,
the one responsible for 29% REDUCTION in surface temps before the counting even starts, became a magical, magical heedur yaW!"

Be convincing when you explain it,

and when you're showing everyone here your OTHER instance
in
ALL thermodynamics,
when a COLD
NITROGEN-OXYGEN BATH,
TURBULENTLY CONDUCTION COOLING
a light warmed ROCK,
it just stopped 28+% of otherwise available warming firelight spectra
from reaching to warm

when such cold light blocking bath became a HEATER: YOU'RE gonna SHOW the WHOLE WORLD ONE TODAY and be the FIRST magic gasser,
to do that.

We'll all wait, you go get that other cold nitrogen bath that's heating what it took twenty nine percent of the energy from just from it's existence between the rock and light source.

The cold nitrogen bath that's a heater: you need to be VERY convincing about it and show us how the reduction in 29% incoming firelight spectra,
energy obviously which is taken off the top FIRST THING

in SURFACE TEMP CALCULATIONS

turns into spontaneous REGENERATION of that NEARLY 30% of total incident sunlight energy, and THEN,
spontaneously generates an additional energy sufficient to cover your clown church's 33 degree error in solving for Earth surface temperature. The ERROR you reach when you can't match the KNOWN GOOD temperature of the planet against which we calibrate ALL our SPACE and AERONAUTICAL and HEAT measuring instruments against.

We KNOW the correct surface temperature and whether you're even bright enough to know it or not YOUR CHURCH CAN'T MATCH THAT in YOUR CALCULATION.

I told you, there is an error if you don't account for something the atmosphere has, and you need to tell me what it is, your church fails to account, when it ERRORS OUT trying to solve for our planet's true, surface temperature.

Again: WE KNOW the CORRECT TEMPERATURE and YOUR CHURCH comes up 33 DEGREES SHORT. WHAT is the NAME of the LAW your FAKE CHURCH FAILS to USE in SOLVING for EARTH surface TEMPERATURE
that ALWAYS leads
to that FATAL 33 DEGREE ERROR?

What does the GAS LAW ACCOUNT FOR that your bumbler's church, FAILS to ACCOUNT?

You need to start evangelizing with your ''two advanced degrees'' by simply naming for us, the LAW that YOUR CHURCH REFUSES to USE that LEADS to the MANDATORY 33 DEGREE SHORTFALL in solving for Earth surface temperature.

I could care less about HOW you START. But you need to FINISH with ''And that's why ALL cold nitroxy baths are actually heaters.''

In SPITE of the fact your own church OBVIOUSLY CALCULATES the atmosphere as CHILLING the planet 29%, RIGHT off the TOP.

Solving surface temperature it's ''how much reaches the SURFACE?'' and this leads to the PROMPT and IRREVOCABLE REMOVAL of 29% total,

otherwise available warming firelight spectra from the sun.

TELL THESE PEOPLE, Mr ''a cold nitrogen bath's a heater and I have two advanced degrees," WHERE you CLAIM these GASES get the ENERGY

to SPONTANEOUSLY REPLACE - this is YOUR CHURCH'S CLAIM not MINE - the 23% THEY take away,

plus the OTHER 6 or 7 % the OTHERS refract away,

THEN generate sufficient energy to warm NOT just the COLD NITROXY BATH but the ENTIRE PLANET SURFACE by 33 degrees?

How is that done. Use big words and like I say, be REAL convincing about the

COLD NITROXY BATH
you CLAIM
is a HEATER.

In spite of the fact you personally - I'LL BET EVERYONE HERE -

can't EVEN NAME the LAW of PHYSICS,
USED
in SOLVING for the Atmosphere's temperature. IT's REAL TEMPERATURE as calculated CORRECTLY in the Internationsl Standard Atmosphere and the more modern,

American Standard Atmosphere, which RE-STATES the ORIGINAL and EXTENDS those calculations UP into ORBITAL SPACE another couple of hundred thousand feet.

You go ''study climatology'' and when you come back you have that OTHER cold nitroxygen bath, that's a heater AT hand to SHOW everyone HOW you hear ''COLD NITROGEN BATH'' and immediately think '' HEEDURS YAW!''
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top