That's right, ignore the logic and go on with the scam.
No need for "the light beeing in the engine". The co2 is still there when its out of the exhaust isn't it? Do u think it looses its properties as a greenhousgas when outside something men build? Sorry but i can't take you seriouse with that bs.99.99% of the time, when CO2 is generated by combustion, the combustion occurs in a car engine or power plant. If there is infrared light, it is inside the car engine or the power plant.
Yes, the Earth is heating, but it's not because CO2 levels rose from 350 to 420 ppm. It's heating because we burn a cubic mile of oil and a cubic mile of coal every year in the process of generating the CO2. (Plus a bunch of natural gas, being burned, generating more CO2)
co2 Does play a role and it does contribute to the heating of the earth. You talk about it like once it's absorbed the infrared light is no longer a factor. The absorption however is only part of what it does. The other part is once it absorbs it, it then re-radiates it, some back down toward the earth thereby adding to the heat caused by the infrared light constantly entering the atmosphere from the sun. They say it's the leading contributor to global warming because scientists estimate that 66% of the heating imbalance is due to co2.Is that curve on the right saying that August was basically normal melt wise,
but July & September were "of concern" ?
I looked up the answer to the question
"what does it mean that CO2 is a greenhouse gas".
Basically, CO2 absorbs infrared, bigger molecules absorb light with the longer wavelength. Methane, CH4, for example.
CO2 & CH4 absorb infrared better because they're bigger than O2 & N2.
However, that is completely irrelevant to the heating of the Earth's atmosphere.
Light coming towards Earth will get absorbed ANYWAY.
Infrared Light leaving Earth will get absorbed by the CO2 & Methane, but that is completely irrelevant.
The notion that CO2 is a problem because it absorbs Infrared light is just another US government lie/ scam.
99.99% of the time, when CO2 is generated by combustion, the combustion occurs in a car engine or power plant. If there is infrared light, it is inside the car engine or the power plant.
Yes, the Earth is heating, but it's not because CO2 levels rose from 350 to 420 ppm. It's heating because we burn a cubic mile of oil and a cubic mile of coal every year in the process of generating the CO2. (Plus a bunch of natural gas, being burned, generating more CO2)
let's frame this a little differentlyThat's right, ignore the logic and go on with the scam.
If you guys put as much energy into learning science, as you do defending your beliefs based on ignorance of science, you'd learn some science.
MIT OpenCourseWare | Free Online Course Materials
MIT OpenCourseWare is a web based publication of virtually all MIT course content. OCW is open and available to the world and is a permanent MIT activityocw.mit.edu
Gas molecules heat other gas molecules by conduction & convection. Unless the gas molecule has been heated enough to emit infrared light, which is not the case.
Once the CO2 comes out of the tailpipe on your car, it's just another medium-hot gas molecule.
You've been scammed by the US government and you're more attached to the Scam than to your own education.
If you put as much energy into LEARNing the science as you do trying to twist it around to defend your ignorance based on misguided beliefs, maybe you would understand climate change is not a scam.
You've been scammed by the US government and you're more attached to the Scam than to your own education.
Just trolling or schrödingers douchbag?I never said that Climate Change is a Scam.
I said that the concept that CO2's is a Harmful Greenhouse Gas is a Scam
Actually what you said regarding scams was "You've been scammed by the US government and you're more attached to the Scam than to your own education."I never said that Climate Change is a Scam.
I said that the concept that CO2's is a Harmful Greenhouse Gas is a Scam, i.e. the concept that CO2's infrared absorption characteristic is a problem, is a scam.
CO2 is a problem, because of how it affects Wildfire behavior. Not because of its infrared absorption characteristic.
You're making the most clueless mistake that climate change deniers make. Just because the global average temperature is warning doesn't mean that weather will warm up all across the planet. That's why they stopped calling it global warming and instead started calling it Climate Change. The amount of warming to put us over the tipping point is just 2 degrees but as we get closer to that ice keeps melting in places where it should have stopped and you get cold weather and snow in places that should be warm and toasty. It can also mean you get rain in places where traditionally there is drought and drought in places where there is traditionally rain.Lowest temp in Adelaide, South Australia in 30 years and SNOW, we don't get snow here in SA.
The planet's warming, yeah right.
it greatly depends on how long it takes to flip. a long drawn-out reversal could really play hell with electronics, energy distribution, comm-sats, and even possibly render parts of the world uninhabitable due to the loss of protection that earths gravity field gives us from radiation. we are overdue for a flip, as scientists estimate it happens every 550,000 years or so, and the last was about 780,000 years ago.Can someone explain to me what would happen if the South and North Poles flipped
Yeah, there's no pole, it's just a scam.Have any of you gasbags been to the North Pole?
Until Santa weighs in on this, it's all off topic conjecture.