What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Have you looked at the North Pole lately?

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
I present the 2022 NOAA climate report synopsis

Global Temperatures​

The year 2022 was the sixth warmest year since global records began in 1880 at 0.86°C (1.55°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F). This value is 0.13°C (0.23°F) less than the record set in 2016 and it is only 0.02°C (0.04°F) higher than the last year's (2021) value, which now ranks as the seventh highest. The 10 warmest years in the 143-year record have all occurred since 2010, with the last nine years (2014–2022) ranking as the nine warmest years on record. Of note, the year 2005, which was the first year to set a new global temperature record in the 21st century, currently ties with 2013 as the 11th-warmest year on record. The year 2010, which had surpassed 2005 at the time, now ranks as the 10th-warmest year on record.
 

Three Berries

Active member
I present the 2022 NOAA climate report synopsis

Global Temperatures​

The year 2022 was the sixth warmest year since global records began in 1880 at 0.86°C (1.55°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F). This value is 0.13°C (0.23°F) less than the record set in 2016 and it is only 0.02°C (0.04°F) higher than the last year's (2021) value, which now ranks as the seventh highest. The 10 warmest years in the 143-year record have all occurred since 2010, with the last nine years (2014–2022) ranking as the nine warmest years on record. Of note, the year 2005, which was the first year to set a new global temperature record in the 21st century, currently ties with 2013 as the 11th-warmest year on record. The year 2010, which had surpassed 2005 at the time, now ranks as the 10th-warmest year on record.
Mankind has been around how many years? And we want to kill off the population because of 143 year old records?

I have a tree about that old.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
1673815287588.png


solar cycle evident but still increasing snow coverage.


1673815639431.png


The New Pause lengthens: 100 Months with No Warming At All​

 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
there will come a day where there will not be enough fossil fuel
and millions(or billions) will die
not a question of if but when
there is no such thing as fossil fuels.
millions and billions will die and nothing will change that fact, but it won't be from lack of petroleum products. the earth creates/makes petroleum oil due to temperature and pressure within. why would the government/TPTB restrict extraction of said petroleum if your hypothesis is correct? you have put too much faith in authorities that have little interest in your well being.

i won't go along with thinking that these bioweapons are about eliminating populations, but providing an Hegelian Dialectic prompting synthesis of desired outcome of totalitarianism.

there is a much higher chance of those billions dying from solar micro-nova.

as for the weather, Mammoth mountain has now over 33' of snow.
how is the skiing in Tennessee there sport?
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
there is no such thing as fossil fuels.
millions and billions will die and nothing will change that fact, but it won't be from lack of petroleum products. the earth creates/makes petroleum oil due to temperature and pressure within. why would the government/TPTB restrict extraction of said petroleum if your hypothesis is correct? you have put too much faith in authorities that have little interest in your well being.

i won't go along with thinking that these bioweapons are about eliminating populations, but providing an Hegelian Dialectic prompting synthesis of desired outcome of totalitarianism.

there is a much higher chance of those billions dying from solar micro-nova.

as for the weather, Mammoth mountain has now over 33' of snow.
how is the skiing in Tennessee there sport?
thus you consider coal to not be a fossil fuel
where fossilized organisms are routinely found in coal beds
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
perhaps i should have been more specific. oil/petroleum are not fossil fuels.
i stand corrected.
surely you don't think coal can supply the energy needed now, never mind future application.
when was the last time you used coal for anything?

Conclusions​

  1. Geological data presented in this chapter do not respond to the main questions related to the hypothesis of biotic petroleum origin. Only the theory of the abiogenic deep origin of hydrocarbons gives convincing explanation for all above-mentioned data.
  2. The experimental results discussed in the chapter confirm that the CaCO3-FeO-H2O system spontaneously generates the suite of hydrocarbons in characteristic of natural petroleum. Modern scientific considerations about genesis of hydrocarbons confirmed by the results of experiments and practical results of geological investigations provide the understanding that a part of the hydrocarbon compounds could be generated at the mantle conditions and migrated through the deep faults into the Earth’s crust where they are formed oil and gas deposits in any kind of rocks and in any kind of their structural position.
  3. The experimental results presented place the theory of the abiogenic deep origin of hydrocarbons in the mainstream of modern physics and chemistry and open a great practical application. The theory of the abiogenic deep origin of hydrocarbons confirms the presence of enormous, inexhaustible resources of hydrocarbons in our planet, allows us to develop a new approach to methods for petroleum exploration and to reexamine the structure, size and location of the world’s hydrocarbons reserves (www.jogmec.go.jp).
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran


A Big Green Mess in Germany With Coal a Stunning 31 Percent of Electricity

Assume there is a problem, then if there is a solution, it will not be the like of Gretta, AOC, Al Gore, president Biden, or the Green Party hypocrites who will fix it.

Look no further than the Big Green Mess in Germany for what happens when politicians are faced with the decision to heat homes cheaply or cut back on CO2.

The EU plans to tax other nations for not addressing climate change, while Germany bulldozes a town to increase the size of a coal mine. It's also lignite coal, the dirtiest kind.

Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck, a Green who is Germany’s economy and climate minister, defended the agreement as “a good decision for climate protection” that fulfills many of the environmentalists’ demands and saves five other villages from demolition.
 

Redrum92

Well-known member
there is no such thing as fossil fuels.
millions and billions will die and nothing will change that fact, but it won't be from lack of petroleum products. the earth creates/makes petroleum oil due to temperature and pressure within. why would the government/TPTB restrict extraction of said petroleum if your hypothesis is correct? you have put too much faith in authorities that have little interest in your well being.

i won't go along with thinking that these bioweapons are about eliminating populations, but providing an Hegelian Dialectic prompting synthesis of desired outcome of totalitarianism.

there is a much higher chance of those billions dying from solar micro-nova.

as for the weather, Mammoth mountain has now over 33' of snow.
how is the skiing in Tennessee there sport?


"Fossil fuels are made from decomposing plants and animals. These fuels are found in the Earth's crust and contain carbon and hydrogen, which can be burned for energy. Coal, oil, and natural gas are examples of fossil fuels."

^That's the definiton. It has been a common use colloquialism for decades now

I'd love a source on that "there is a much higher chance of billions dying from a solar micro nova"

Also, the issue is not so much the lack of fossil fuel sources, its that combustion of them releases exhaust, which accumulates. Totally different issue.
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
perhaps i should have been more specific. oil/petroleum are not fossil fuels.
i stand corrected.
surely you don't think coal can supply the energy needed now, never mind future application.
when was the last time you used coal for anything?
abiogenic oil/nat gas is considered fringe science
just for the sake of argument, lets say it's happening
that nat gas is leaking out from the deep earth
well it's not replenishing the depleted oil fields
and new fields are not popping into existence
if it's happening at all it's slow, too slow to make a difference
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
Who the fuck do you know suggesting killing humans to stave off global warming lmfao....
kill? bit of drama there
population adjustments by a sensible use of incentives wouldn't hurt
and if it was just about 146 year records that's one thing
it's the projections that are the problem
semantics aside the result is the same.
UN and Davos crowd relentlessly persuing reduction in energy. that will kill people just as dead as kinetic war or biowarfare.
information warfare has already reduced information about climate to a canard.
keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.

as for the solar micro nova...
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79B00752A000300070001-8.pdf
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
abiogenic oil/nat gas is considered fringe science
just for the sake of argument, lets say it's happening
that nat gas is leaking out from the deep earth
well it's not replenishing the depleted oil fields
and new fields are not popping into existence
if it's happening at all it's slow, too slow to make a difference
of course it's been characterized as fringe.
in truth, that would negate the hypothesis of scarcity and collapse prices.
the peer reviewed paper previously presented is dangerous to that hypothesis.

"Do oil wells replenish themselves?


Oil reappears from time to time in old deposits and long ago exhausted oil wells. Oil sometimes rushes in or sometimes floods back.In the researchers' opinion, to overhaul old oil deposits is currently much more profitable and efficient than expensive geological exploration works at new locations.Feb 3, 2008"
 
Top