-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Have You Been Vaccinated?
- Thread starter Tudo
- Start date
Killer pussy cat.
Did your doctor tell you that there wasn't a pandemic?
Did your doctor tell you that there wasn't a pandemic?
Last edited:
shiva82
Well-known member
literally thousands of doctors will tell you there was no pandemic .
I got the Cervantes reference.
Which is a little unnerving.
We were there.
We remember.
Doctors shouldn't practice if they are struggling with denial.
right
Well-known member
Was it a gift horse?
Tetanus shots are a good thing to keep up with.
Tetanus shots are a good thing to keep up with.
i recommend the same. i find 5 days a week on the Nordic Track skier - hitting max heart rate - works for me. learned the evils of sugar and taught myself to cook/eat low-carb exactly 6 years ago. thank-you YouTube. only took 24 hours to clear my first covid infection - no anti-bodies needed if the immune system is functioning.
right
Well-known member
The virus was never very mild for me .I had it a couple of times. Milder than a cold in my experience.
regarding the recent ridiculous report about self-assembly shit in the jab ... (not my tweet, just echoing it) ...
The well-poisoning is real and deeply alarming. All of these groups claiming that there is nanotech in the vaccines use shoddy optical microscopy studies and point at gigantic crystals tens of micrometers across, when the primary sources on IoB molecular nanotech describe devices that are smaller than optical microscopes can resolve. How come so few of these people are willing to review the primary sources on IoB nanotechnology, such as Ian Akyildiz and Josep Jornet's papers on graphene LSPR nanoantennas published in IEEE, Charles Lieber's papers on nanowires and nanoFSM, Ehud Gazit's "engineered amyloids", DARPA's N3 program, and so on? There are papers out there published in peer-reviewed journals, written by leading bionanotech experts, that explicitly say, "Yes, we're trying to develop injectable/ingestible biosensors that turn the human body into an IoT device", but instead of going over those, they're just having us look at gigantic crystals and then tossing out wild guesses on what they might be. It's all misdirection, to keep the public from knowing about this: https://rentry.co/wkah734d
10:58 AM · Sep 7, 2024
291 Views
looks like more fun and games to come, eh?
The well-poisoning is real and deeply alarming. All of these groups claiming that there is nanotech in the vaccines use shoddy optical microscopy studies and point at gigantic crystals tens of micrometers across, when the primary sources on IoB molecular nanotech describe devices that are smaller than optical microscopes can resolve. How come so few of these people are willing to review the primary sources on IoB nanotechnology, such as Ian Akyildiz and Josep Jornet's papers on graphene LSPR nanoantennas published in IEEE, Charles Lieber's papers on nanowires and nanoFSM, Ehud Gazit's "engineered amyloids", DARPA's N3 program, and so on? There are papers out there published in peer-reviewed journals, written by leading bionanotech experts, that explicitly say, "Yes, we're trying to develop injectable/ingestible biosensors that turn the human body into an IoT device", but instead of going over those, they're just having us look at gigantic crystals and then tossing out wild guesses on what they might be. It's all misdirection, to keep the public from knowing about this: https://rentry.co/wkah734d
10:58 AM · Sep 7, 2024
291 Views
looks like more fun and games to come, eh?
and Kevin McKernan adds his voice ...
I have stayed away from commenting on this paper as I continually get accused of being a DNA contam myopic person who must shoot down any alternative theory of harm… But this paper is a scientific competency test that many people in our medical freedom movement failed miserably. It has been informative to just shut up and watch who falls for it. It’s a well poisoning trick. Circulate semi-believable flat-earth like work and watch the large channels echo it for engagement and views. Much of this movement has limited revenue and is clutching to social media metrics to survive. That lowers their guard and they circulate sometimes laughable papers and then their entire valuable contributions to this field are now tainted with circulating shoddy work. Talk to people in the microscopy space. All kinds of things self assembly as liquids dry out under excitation heat and evaporative forces.
I have stayed away from commenting on this paper as I continually get accused of being a DNA contam myopic person who must shoot down any alternative theory of harm… But this paper is a scientific competency test that many people in our medical freedom movement failed miserably. It has been informative to just shut up and watch who falls for it. It’s a well poisoning trick. Circulate semi-believable flat-earth like work and watch the large channels echo it for engagement and views. Much of this movement has limited revenue and is clutching to social media metrics to survive. That lowers their guard and they circulate sometimes laughable papers and then their entire valuable contributions to this field are now tainted with circulating shoddy work. Talk to people in the microscopy space. All kinds of things self assembly as liquids dry out under excitation heat and evaporative forces.
moose eater
Well-known member
Captain Red Eye
Active member
Always trust the science! 
Micronite made smoking safe again.
www.asbestos.com
Asbestos Cigarette Filters: History of Kent Micronite & Lawsuits
Cigarette filters produced for Kent Micronite from 1952-1954 contained crocidolite asbestos fibers, the most hazardous of the six types of asbestos.
www.asbestos.com
did he explain that the person that you give it to might die themselves ? how fucking stupid. NOT your decision.
right
Well-known member
Im not sure that we understand each other. Who would I give a vaccine to ?
What she told me was that taking the vaccine wouldn't stop me from transmitting the virus to someone else. She said that it would reduce my chances of death or serious symptoms
What she told me was that taking the vaccine wouldn't stop me from transmitting the virus to someone else. She said that it would reduce my chances of death or serious symptoms
.
