I think he might mean that nature culls negative traits...
If so I agree... even indoors, weakness lessen the likelihood of propagation.
If so I agree... even indoors, weakness lessen the likelihood of propagation.
No need as far as I am concerned, except that you would obviously want to select parents which are not genetically programed to have negative epigenetic responses easily.
selecting for something which is temporary would be less fruitful than selecting away from epigenetic negatives, imho.
what could be considerd a positive epigenetic reaction???
Clones don't change, they don't drift. I have clones more then 20 years old that are still the same as year one. Yes in theory it could have a mutation, but that is rare and wont happen to back up copies, if you keep them.
What clones do is pick up viruses and then they can lose vigor and yield. They can be cleaned up of some viruses by fast growing, or special treatments, and then the taking of very small meristems to be grown in-vitro or rooted virus free.
-SamS
all this makes my head hurt, trying to follow..........
i think what you might be saying is that environment issues caused my strain to mess up?
the kushberry happened at a completely different grow spot.
i only take clones from healthy moms, and only healthy clones. if the moms start to "wood" up, i toss her.........
all this makes my head hurt, trying to follow..........
i think what you might be saying is that environment issues caused my strain to mess up?
the kushberry happened at a completely different grow spot.
i only take clones from healthy moms, and only healthy clones. if the moms start to "wood" up, i toss her.........
But they're not. As the research Head posted explains.
No they are not. Have you not read any of the thread you are contributing to?
Epigenetic changes are not always heritable.
This quote seems to be misleading you. Darwin is talking about adaptation of a species, not talking on the level of the individual. Don't let the terms confuse you. If you had to start carrying the brick hod all day at work, your body would adapt by developing larger muscles and seriously calloused hands. Would that be a mutation? Also Darwin had no knowledge of epigenetics, which allow adaptation without mutation. Don't want to get down on you rick, because I admire your desire to learn but that last post made it look like you've learned nothing from this thread.
In this thread there's only one person talking any sense on a topic that his has an understanding of (but is clearly not a practicing student/scientist in the field) and that's Head. Then there's Hoosier playing internet catchup, a bit out of his depth, googling every term he reads to try to find something he can pick at.
What happens if the hog carrier has a son who goes into the same trade? will he adapt quicker than someone who's background is not from construction etc?
Kopite
i have 2 dogs,,,,a boxer and a huskie
the boxer is natural guard dog,,,,she would love to rip a kids head off,,,at times she tries,,,,but this is just 1 of the classic boxer mentalitys
the huskie ive had since she was 8 weeks old,,,,she is totaly pre disposed to PULLING,,,she is by nature a working dog,,,,her attitude is also classicly huskie,,,,,she`s over friendly,Inderpendant and not house-protective , she supa distructive when board an even tho her mouth and teath make her look like a friggin wolf she is a classic huskie,,,,shes programed to work and live in a PACK,,,,,,,,, shes is a handfull and every huskie owner eperences the same issues,,,,
all huskies seem to share the same attitude,,,
both are clasic examples of how dogs have pre-disposed abilitys and atitude due to selection and conditioning,,,,
ps ,,,zippy is a weed eater,,,she prefers dry weed but wont say no to stems,,,,,,,,keep your twigs safe zippys about,,,
As seed makers, do you not think it would be in Sam's and Myself's best interest to push the myth of genetic drift? If it were the case that clones often genetically change, I would be advertising it as a reason to buy good fresh seed. Unfortunately, There are no grounds (certainly not senescence) upon which to do so.