Half of the shit he posted looked pretty loose, not how i like my nugs personally, why does he think he's the don of growing even though it's so diverse, seems very naive to me.
Half of the shit he posted looked pretty loose, not how i like my nugs personally, why does he think he's the don of growing even though it's so diverse, seems very naive to me.
Density is influenced by his strain, he's proud of the number he pulls, and I would be too. I've read through the pages a couple times not from start to finish but Dr. doesn't come off as a arrogant. His system is time/production tested no point arguing anything related to this. Nice nugs my t5s made a mess of a bagseed grow ..pureeeeeeeeeeeeeeee fluff so sad
Originally Posted by Chief Rbud
i am.LOL, i would never use internet explorer. and ahh, Zoid, take a look at post # 863 to see what you can do with a little bit bigger setup but still in a closet. and like i said in an above post, i wasn't able to utilize all the cfl's light because all of them didnt have reflectors. i have since built a pair of very effective "hoods" that work great to concentrate the light right over my growing space, and they are adjustable easily height wise. my buds this go round look much bigger than they did last time at this time in flowering.
Originally Posted by Chief Rbud
those are sativa dominant buds, they wouldnt look any denser under the SUN, much less under a 1000 watt hid. they are supposed to look that way.
Density is influenced by his strain, he's proud of the number he pulls, and I would be too. I've read through the pages a couple times not from start to finish but Dr. doesn't come off as a arrogant. His system is time/production tested no point arguing anything related to this. Nice nugs my t5s made a mess of a bagseed grow ..pureeeeeeeeeeeeeeee fluff so sad
yeahHEY DR WHEN YOU MEAN 42 WATT DO YOU MEAN 42 WATT EQUIVALENT 150 WATT