we do not need science to define our humanity or work within its parameters
science, being born from the same race from which the various dogmas and philosophies were born from are still , like us, evolving
when science is no longer diluted by subjective beings then ill "cancel my subscription to the resurrection*"
Of the various dogmas and philosophies born of humans, good science is unique in that it is centered upon methodologies of self correction (note; the Dalai Lama has argued that portions of Bhuddism involving observation, and science, are the same). There is nothing that we are involved in that isn't the product of "subjective beings".
So all humans have within them the capacity for both good and evil. Knowledge can be applied to achieve both ends. Science is a methodology to acquire and verify knowledge. So science can be applied to achieve both good or evil. Requires very little verbiage to state this.
http://www.popsci.com/science/artic...ve-been-unable-reproduce-studies-survey-finds
Number Of Published Cancer Studies That Can't Be Reproduced Is Shockingly High
Half of cancer scientists have failed to reproduce the findings of other researchers, according to an anonymous survey.
* little doors plagiarism in honor of r.kreiger
we do not need science to define our humanity or work within its parameters
the capacity to understand good and evil relative to humanity exists within us regardless of science or the need for it
did science create humanity?