Babombeez
Active member
newbgrow said:I've already told you a million times, if you had read your article in context, it said the administration will act like a defense department in terms of protecting regulated technologies from foreign applications. It did not say that NASA was a defense department, period, in all circumstances, only in that particular instance it would act defensively. Are you still going to pick at this point?
If what you said was true, the US government would go on a crusade to rid the world of scientists in the name of "national security", and since every boy and girl over 2nd grade can tell you dinosaurs existed before 4004 BCE, there would be a lot of problems.
For the last Fcking time NASA is not a defense agency. You can keep posting from your "Bible" and run and hide when someone posts evidence to debunk it... whatever.
Listen to yourself. Indeed you cannot pretend that NASA is not acting as an adjunct to the Department of Defense, helping with the implementation of space weaponry in orbit around the Earth, and other top secret programs.... I did not take the passage out of context. I am not the one running and hiding here.
I don't recall posting from the Bible, because I talk about Creationism and how the Earth is not 6000 years old... Religion has dismissed science over and over, but they cannot dismiss remnants of civilization on the moon.
If NASA is hiding information from us in the words of "National Security" then they are INDEED acting as a Defense Agency, you are saying space based sensors are not a defense project??? Open your eyes fool.
Take a chill pill, miserable dude
Beez