he was stupid enough to publicly brag that it was done solely to put off paying for his crimes for years. he is on film saying this, and the govt has 3 years worth of his cell phone messages in hand. shithead is going to pay, and pay dearly. and we'll get to watch it on tv!
how many times did she say "no" when she really wanted to say "shut the fuck up, moron!" just curious, you know?
the look you get when you realize that the prosecutors know the truth, and the judge won't let you lie and hide the facts from jurors or public. "into the gibbet cage with you..."
If that's true, she is washed with integrity if compared to an individual supportive of ridiculous Q drivel.
That may take a bit for him to answer seeing as how the geniuses over at "Q" haven't figured out how to spin this into something they wanted to happen. That this somehow all part of the master plan to expose the shocking truth to the world! Or some such nonsense.
I've been enjoying the show. My suspicion is that Alex Jones is a double or triple agent. I suspect that he is an agent of the Deep State (Mossad) and that his role was to put truth out there and then use him as a means to attack first amendment rights and smear conspiracy theorists. However, I also suspect that he may be working with the good guys (double agent) against Mossad. All in all, I do not consider him a 'friendly.' Why was he allowed to gain such influence before Sandy Hook while others were censored, shadow-banned, or marginalized? Why was he, and pretty much he alone, allowed and enabled to be the 'spokesperson' or 'face' of all conspiracy theorists? Controlled? By who?
beat me to it. i'm getting old...
….or he’s just what he appears : an asshole who found a way to profit off spieling mindless bullshit…and then selling merchandise to the gullible jerk offs who actually…are retarded enough…to take him serious.
I'm sure this comes as no surprise, but... I suspect there is a bit more to it than that.
Got Bud was correct. You did not answer. (as usual)
Yes I did. But, to answer more specifically, as to the court proceedings... I think it is a foregon conclusion that he will be held liable. But, if he is, what precedent would that set for holding members of The Deep State accountable? These people are stupid and short sighted.
That aside, what of the subject matter? Was the shooting a sham or whatever other word one uses to convey con or falsehood?
