What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?

Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?

  • yes, gimme

    Votes: 29 31.9%
  • not yet

    Votes: 15 16.5%
  • no way

    Votes: 47 51.6%

  • Total voters
    91
  • Poll closed .

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
Nope you're just very misinformed, the jab development was financed with public money.

Since 2000, taxpayer dollars have financed the development of various vaccine platforms for HIV, pandemic flu, and other threats to public health. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the government leveraged investments in those platforms in three ways. First, it supported additional preclinical studies. Second, it absorbed the bulk of human testing costs and risk through a set of contracts that paid for the various phases of vaccine development and manufacturing. And third, it reduced manufacturing risk by underwriting capacity investments.

https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20210512.191448/

that is how govts aid in developing vaccines, medicine etc in a crisis. this surprises you for some reason. huh...
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
Nope you're just very misinformed, the jab development was financed with public money.

Since 2000, taxpayer dollars have financed the development of various vaccine platforms for HIV, pandemic flu, and other threats to public health. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the government leveraged investments in those platforms in three ways. First, it supported additional preclinical studies. Second, it absorbed the bulk of human testing costs and risk through a set of contracts that paid for the various phases of vaccine development and manufacturing. And third, it reduced manufacturing risk by underwriting capacity investments.

https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20210512.191448/

welcome to the capitalist system of exploitation.

and yet you probably still dont support abolishing,breaking up, or nationalizing these companies lol
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
Nope you're just very misinformed, the jab development was financed with public money.

Since 2000, taxpayer dollars have financed the development of various vaccine platforms for HIV, pandemic flu, and other threats to public health. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the government leveraged investments in those platforms in three ways. First, it supported additional preclinical studies. Second, it absorbed the bulk of human testing costs and risk through a set of contracts that paid for the various phases of vaccine development and manufacturing. And third, it reduced manufacturing risk by underwriting capacity investments.

https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20210512.191448/

You mean tax money? Lordy me! I thought it was some bald guy out of Cleveland. Maybe that was a cartoon though.
Another silly road. Yes. Our government does invest in research. Most folks already know. Did you just learn that? You’re getting behind on your home schooling. Page 3 in your workbook.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
/Are Double- and Triple-Jabbed People at Risk for VAIDS?


By now you may be wondering whether this negative effectiveness could be indicative of something far worse than just being more prone to Omicron infection. The Exposé[SUP]20[/SUP] believes the double- and triple-jabbed may actually have vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or VAIDS, similar to AIDS.

While I think it’s still too early to come to a definitive conclusion, former Pfizer vice president Michael Yeadon has made a similar statement.[SUP]21[/SUP] In a December 6, 2021, article on americasfrontlinedoctors.org, Yeadon is quoted saying:[SUP]22[/SUP]

“If immune erosion occurs after two doses and just a few months, how can we exclude the possibility that effects of an untested ‘booster’ will not erode more rapidly and to a greater extent?”

The article goes on to cite a Lancet preprint[SUP]23[/SUP] that compared outcomes among “vaccinated” and unvaccinated Swedes over the course of nine months. As in other studies, they found that protection against symptomatic COVID rapidly declined, and by six months’ post-jab, “some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.”

“Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated ‘immune erosion’ or ‘acquired immune deficiency,’ accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness,” the Frontline Doctors explain.[SUP]24[/SUP]

The article also cites an August 2021 report from Scotland,[SUP]25[/SUP] which found those who had received the jab were 3.3 times more likely to die from COVID infection than the unvaccinated — a finding that certainly blows a huge hole in the claim that the jab prevents serious illness and death even if you do get symptomatic infection.

https://www.technocracy.news/mercola...-systems-fail/

are your papers in order?
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
/Are Double- and Triple-Jabbed People at Risk for VAIDS?


By now you may be wondering whether this negative effectiveness could be indicative of something far worse than just being more prone to Omicron infection. The Exposé[SUP]20[/SUP] believes the double- and triple-jabbed may actually have vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or VAIDS, similar to AIDS.

While I think it’s still too early to come to a definitive conclusion, former Pfizer vice president Michael Yeadon has made a similar statement.[SUP]21[/SUP] In a December 6, 2021, article on americasfrontlinedoctors.org, Yeadon is quoted saying:[SUP]22[/SUP]

“If immune erosion occurs after two doses and just a few months, how can we exclude the possibility that effects of an untested ‘booster’ will not erode more rapidly and to a greater extent?”

The article goes on to cite a Lancet preprint[SUP]23[/SUP] that compared outcomes among “vaccinated” and unvaccinated Swedes over the course of nine months. As in other studies, they found that protection against symptomatic COVID rapidly declined, and by six months’ post-jab, “some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.”

“Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated ‘immune erosion’ or ‘acquired immune deficiency,’ accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness,” the Frontline Doctors explain.[SUP]24[/SUP]

The article also cites an August 2021 report from Scotland,[SUP]25[/SUP] which found those who had received the jab were 3.3 times more likely to die from COVID infection than the unvaccinated — a finding that certainly blows a huge hole in the claim that the jab prevents serious illness and death even if you do get symptomatic infection.

https://www.technocracy.news/*******...-systems-fail/

are your papers in order?

More clickbait
 

GOT_BUD?

Weed is a gateway to gardening
ICMag Donor
Veteran
/Are Double- and Triple-Jabbed People at Risk for VAIDS?


By now you may be wondering whether this negative effectiveness could be indicative of something far worse than just being more prone to Omicron infection. The Exposé[SUP]20[/SUP] believes the double- and triple-jabbed may actually have vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or VAIDS, similar to AIDS.

While I think it’s still too early to come to a definitive conclusion, former Pfizer vice president Michael Yeadon has made a similar statement.[SUP]21[/SUP] In a December 6, 2021, article on americasfrontlinedoctors.org, Yeadon is quoted saying:[SUP]22[/SUP]

“If immune erosion occurs after two doses and just a few months, how can we exclude the possibility that effects of an untested ‘booster’ will not erode more rapidly and to a greater extent?”

The article goes on to cite a Lancet preprint[SUP]23[/SUP] that compared outcomes among “vaccinated” and unvaccinated Swedes over the course of nine months. As in other studies, they found that protection against symptomatic COVID rapidly declined, and by six months’ post-jab, “some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.”

“Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated ‘immune erosion’ or ‘acquired immune deficiency,’ accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness,” the Frontline Doctors explain.[SUP]24[/SUP]

The article also cites an August 2021 report from Scotland,[SUP]25[/SUP] which found those who had received the jab were 3.3 times more likely to die from COVID infection than the unvaccinated — a finding that certainly blows a huge hole in the claim that the jab prevents serious illness and death even if you do get symptomatic infection.

https://www.technocracy.news/*******...-systems-fail/

are your papers in order?

Keep fucking that chicken
 

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
My neighbor got jabbed up and boosted. He is struggling with pneumonia thats been going on two months and now he has leukemia. The other day, my Grandma, who was pressured into getting jabbed, told me her doctor said her white cells are high... (primary sign of leukemia). My guess is that this is happening a lot.
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
You mean tax money? Lordy me! I thought it was some bald guy out of Cleveland. Maybe that was a cartoon though.
Another silly road. Yes. Our government does invest in research. Most folks already know. Did you just learn that? You’re getting behind on your home schooling. Page 3 in your workbook.

Nope didn't just learned that, Japan is doing the same, but probably you don't understand the situation here.Your government is funding all the research with tax money, paid with tax money the jabs and meanwhile Big Pharma can raise the price of those jabs and make big profits.Xiden shall raises taxes for the losses his government had made.Comprendido!
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
Nope didn't just learned that, Japan is doing the same, but probably you don't understand the situation here.Your government is funding all the research with tax money, paid with tax money the jabs and meanwhile Big Pharma can raise the price of those jabs and make big profits.Xiden shall raises taxes for the losses his government had made.Comprendido!

Thanks for your explanation. I’m very paranoid now. Hiding under the bed. I never realized how much control they had over you. whatever. Perhaps you mistake your silliness for intelligence.
 

Three Berries

Active member
My neighbor got jabbed up and boosted. He is struggling with pneumonia thats been going on two months and now he has leukemia. The other day, my Grandma, who was pressured into getting jabbed, told me her doctor said her white cells are high... (primary sign of leukemia). My guess is that this is happening a lot.

My brother has been a type 1 diabetic most of his life. He was getting pneumonia every winter and ending up in the hospital. The last time almost killed him. This had been going on for 5 years every year. They finally figured out it was the flu shots he was getting were actually aggravating the situation. Two years and no hospital stays now.
 

Three Berries

Active member
https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimage...jpg
 
Top