commies

[Eltitoguay]

Personal Offtopic, or the bad thing about having a communist headquarters with bar, on your street...:

NOTICE TO ALL THE COMMUNIST GRAFFITISTS ON MY STREET:

Let's see who the hell was the idiot, starting to graffiti slogans on a street in a humble working-class neighborhood, and to make matters worse on the facade of my little and humble house... And if it was a Bansky...

Banksy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So in the future, and unless you are a Bansky, you are going to graffiti these things in the center of town, in the neighborhood of the bourgeois and wealthy, and if possible on the facades of the local headquarters of the P.P. and from VOX...

...Whoever sees graffiti on the wall again...



Poscript : ...you'll see how some cattails also sting here...

 

[Eltitoguay]

A TRIUMPHANT REVOLUTION IN WESTERN EUROPE 50 YEARS AGO :

Portugal | The Carnation Revolution |1974

ThamesTv ; 02/05/1974​

'This week' is in the Portuguese capital of Lisbon one week after the Carnation Revolution which overthrew the Regime of the Estado Novo. Original 16mm Film.

 

[right]

Ronnie the bane of Communism

After what this administration did to our country Ronald Reagan is making a come back

 

[Eltitoguay]

Who would read pages and pages of this nonsense. The entire civilized world is hip to this misguided evil garbage.

 

[right]

Don't know what the video is supposed to mean. Hahahaha Haha
But . Better dead than red

 

[right]

Overcoming Evil

Freedom
Freedom
Freedom

 

[Eltitoguay]

You butthurt that NO ONE ,will read or respond(...)
NO ONE

Heh heh... It's been a long time since someone earned the complete Trilogía del Tontorrón so deservedly and so hard...
The 3rd and final part. Congratulations!!


FREEDOM !! For Palestine too

 

[right]

Freedom
Freedom
Freedom

 

[Eltitoguay]

A TRIUMPHANT REVOLUTION IN WESTERN EUROPE 50 YEARS AGO :

Portugal: Carnations against Dictatorship | ARTE.tv Documentary

ARTE.tv Documentary​

ARTE.tv Documentary is here to tell you more about what’s going on in the world of culture, news and current affairs with powerful, refreshing and entertaining docs subtitled in English for our international fans:
In April 1974, left-wing factions in the Portuguese military staged a coup against the authoritarian regime which had been in power for half a century. The uprising was largely peaceful and went down in history as the Carnation Revolution. But the path to a democratic Portugal was not easy and not without obstacles.

Des œillets pour la Révolution | ARTE

ARTE​

Disponible jusqu'au 17/07/2024.
Le 25 avril 1974, au Portugal, la Révolution des Oeillets mettait fin à la dictature salazariste et à cinq siècles d’histoire coloniale. Plusieurs témoins racontent ce jour décisif, qui a laissé une empreinte profonde dans la vie de leurs compatriotes.
Le 25 avril 1974, au Portugal, un soulèvement militaire balaie le salazarisme, du nom du dictateur António de Oliveira Salazar, au pouvoir de 1932 à 1968. Tandis que les troupes du Mouvement des forces armées s’emparent des lieux stratégiques, la population descend massivement dans la rue pour les soutenir. Nommée en référence aux fleurs que les soldats accrochent à leur fusil pour exprimer leurs intentions pacifiques, la révolution des œillets met fin, sans effusion de sang, à la plus longue dictature que l’Europe ait connue au XXe siècle, ainsi qu’à cinq siècles de politique colonialiste. Témoins de l’époque, le colonel Carlos Matos Gomes et le journaliste radio Adelino Gomes retracent avec émotion cette journée décisive pour leur pays, qui occupe encore une place majeure dans la mémoire de leurs compatriotes. Sans oublier Celeste Caeiro, la femme qui, les bras chargés d’œillets, en distribuait aux soldats. Documentaire de Brigitte Kleine (Allemagne, 2024, 44mn)

 

[right]

January 5, 1967: Inaugural Address (Public Ceremony)
The following speech transcript contains this speech as it was given by then Governor Ronald Reagan. Other text versions online and an earlier version posted by the Library contained a written version released to the press. Reagan made a considerable amount of small edits and added two paragraphs in conclusion to the actual version given.

January 5, 1967

Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Legislature, my fellow Constitutional Officers, Members of our California Congressional Delegation and Fellow Californians:

I'm sorry that this administration and the legislature wasn't able to deliver the sunshine a few days earlier, but you must be aware we have been very busy just getting acquainted with each other and we saved it for this morning.

To a number of us, this is a first and hence a solemn and a momentous occasion, and yet, on the broad page of state and national history, what is taking place here is almost a commonplace routine. We are participating in the orderly transfer of administrative authority by direction of the people. And this is the simple magic of the commonplace routine, which makes it a near miracle to many of the worlds inhabitants. This continuing fact that the people, by democratic process, can delegate power, and yet retain the custody of it.

Perhaps you and I have lived too long with this miracle to properly be appreciative. Freedom is a fragile thing and it's never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. And those in world history who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again.

Knowing this, it's hard to explain those among us who even today would question the people's capacity for self- government. I've often wondered if they will answer, those who subscribe to that philosophy: if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? Using the temporary authority granted by the people, in increasing number lately at all levels of government, have sought control even of the means of production as if they could do this without eventually controlling those who produce. And always they explain this as necessary to the people's welfare. "The deterioration of every government begins with the decay of the principle upon which it was founded." This was written in 1748, and it's as true today as it was then.

Government is the people's business, and every man, woman and child becomes a shareholder with the first penny of tax paid. With all the profound wording of our federal Constitution, probably the most meaningful words are the first three, "We, the People." And those of us here today who have been elected to constitutional office and to the legislature are in that three word phrase. We are of the people, we are chosen by the people to see that no permanent structure of government ever encroaches on the people's freedom or assumes a power beyond that which has freely been granted to us by the people. We stand between the taxpayer and the tax spender.

Now, it is inconceivable to me that anyone could accept this delegated authority without asking Gods help. And I pray, that we of the legislature and the administration can be granted the wisdom and the strength beyond our own limited powers. That with divine guidance we can avoid easy expedience. That we can work to build a state where liberty under law and justice can triumph, where compassion can govern and wherein the people can participate and prosper because of their government and not in spite of it.

Now the path we chart is not an easy one. It demands much of those chosen to govern, but also from those who did the choosing. And let there be no mistake about this. We have come to a crossroad, a time of decision, and the path we'll follow turns away from any idea that those in government, those who serve government are omnipotent. And this path is impossible to follow unless we have the collective wisdom and genius of all our people. Along this path government will lead and not rule, it will listen and not lecture. It is the path of a Creative Society.

And no problems discussed during the campaign, the number of problems that have been discussed, I see no reason why there should be a change in the subject now. Campaign oratory on the issues of crime, and pollution of air and water, and conservation, and welfare and extended educational facilities doesn't mean that now the campaign oratory has ended the issues will go away. Problems remain to be solved and the problems challenge all of us. Our government will lead, of course, but the answer must come from all of us.

Now we'll make specific proposals and we'll solicit from all of you other ideas. In the area where crime is double our proportionate share, we'll propose legislation to give back to the local communities the right to pass and enforce ordinances that will enable the police to more adequately protect those communities. Legislation already drafted will be submitted, calling upon the Legislature to clearly state in the future whether newly adopted laws are intended to preempt the right of local governments to legislate in the same field. And hopefully, this will free our judges from having to guess in the future the intent of those who passed that legislation in the first place.

At the same time, I pledge my support and my fullest effort to a plan that will remove from politics, once and for all, the appointment of judges. Not that I believe I'm going to be overburdened with making judicial appointments in the near future.

But just as we assume a responsibility to guard our young people up to a certain age from the possible harmful effects of alcohol and tobacco for example, so I believe we have a right and a responsibility to protect them from the even more harmful effects of exposure to smut and pornography. We can and must and will frame legislation which will accomplish this purpose without endangering freedom of speech or press.

When it is fiscally feasible, we hope to create a California crime technological foundation utilizing both public and private resources in a major effort to employ the most scientific techniques for the control of crime. And at such a time, we should explore the idea of a state police academy to assure that the police of even our smallest communities can have the most advanced training. We lead as a state in many things; we're going to stop leading in crime. Californians should be able to walk their streets safely day or night. And the law abiding are entitled to at least as much protection as the lawbreaker.

And while on the subject of crime, those with a grievance can seek redress in our Courts or in our Legislature, but not in our public streets. Lawlessness by the mob, as with the individual, will not be tolerated. We will act firmly and quickly to put down riot or insurrection wherever and whenever the situation requires.

Welfare. Welfare, is another of our major problems. We're a humane and a generous people and we accept without reservation our obligation to help the disabled, the aged, and those unfortunates who through know fault of their own must depend on their fellow man. But we are not going to perpetuate poverty by substituting a permanent dole for a paycheck. There is no humanity or charity in destroying self-reliance, and dignity and self-respect the very substance of moral fiber.

We'll seek reforms which will, wherever possible, change a relief check to paycheck. Spencer Williams, our Administrator of Health and Welfare, is assessing the amount of work which could be done in public institutions by welfare recipients. And this is not being done in any punitive sense, but as a beginning step in rehabilitation to give to the individual the self-respect which goes with performing a useful service.

But this isn't the ultimate answer. Only private industry in the last analysis can produce jobs with a future. Lieutenant Governor Bob Finch will be the liaison between government and the private sector in an all-out program of job training and education leading to real employment.

A truly great citizen of our state and a fine American, Mr. H. C. McClellan, has agreed to institute statewide a program patterned after the one he directed so successfully in the curfew area of Los Angeles. There, in the year and a half since the tragic riots, fully a half of the unemployed have been channeled into productive jobs in private industry, and more than 2600 business firms are involved. Mr. McClellan will be serving without pay and the entire statewide program will be privately financed. And while this program will be directed at all who lack opportunity, it offers a hope especially for those minorities who today have a disproportionate share of poverty and unemployment.

In the whole area of welfare, everything will be done to reduce administrative overhead, cut red tape and return the control of much of this program into the possession of those who administer the program at the county level. And the goal, the goal will be investment in, and salvage of, human beings.

This administration will cooperate with the State Superintendent of Education in his expressed desires to return more control of curriculum and selection of textbooks to the local school districts. We'll support his efforts to make recruitment of out-of-state teachers less difficult.

And on this subject of education, hundreds of thousands of young men and women will receive an education in our state colleges and our universities. And we're all proud of our ability to provide this opportunity for our youth and we believe it is no denial of academic freedom to provide that education within a framework of reasonable rules and regulations. Nor is it a violation of individual rights to require obedience to those rules and regulations or to insist that those unwilling to abide by those rules seek that education elsewhere.

Now it doesn't constitute political interference with intellectual freedom for the taxpaying citizens of our state who support this college and university system to ask that, in addition to teaching, they build character on accepted moral and ethical standards.

Just as a man is entitled to a voice in his government, he should certainly have that right in the very personal matter of earning a living. Now I have always supported the union shop even though that includes a certain amount of compulsion with regard to union membership. But for that reason it seems to me, government must accept the responsibility for safeguarding each union members democratic rights within that union. And for that reason we will submit legislative proposals guaranteeing each union member the right to a secret ballot in his union on policy matters and the use of union dues.

There is a need for a mediation service in labor-management disputes not covered by existing law.

Improvements will be made in workmen's compensation, in the death benefits and the benefits to the permanently disabled. But at the same time, tightening procedures are needed to free business from some unjust burdens.

A close liaison with our congressional representatives in Washington, Democrat and Republican, are needed so that we can help bring about beneficial changes in social security, secure less restrictive controls on federal grants and work for tax retention plans which will keep some of the federal taxes here for our use with no strings attached. We should strive also to get tax credits for our people to help them defray the cost of sending their children to college.

We'll support a bipartisan effort to lift the archaic 160-acre limitation imposed by the federal government on irrigated farms. Restrictive labor policies should never again be the cause of crops rotting in the fields because of a lack of harvesters.

Here in our own Capitol, we'll seek the solutions to problems of unrealistic taxes which threaten economic ruin to farming, our biggest single industry. We'll work with the farmer as with business, and industry and labor to provide a better business climate that they may prosper and we all may prosper.

Now there are other problems and possible problems facing us. One such is now pending before the United States Supreme Court. I believe it would be inappropriate to discuss this matter now, but we are prepared with remedial legislation which we devoutly hope will be satisfactory to all our citizens if the courts make a ruling that makes this legislation necessary.

This is only a partial accounting of our problems and our dreams of the future. California, with its climate, its resources and its wealth of young, aggressive, talented people, need never take second place in anything. We can provide jobs for our people who will work and we can have honest government at a price we can afford. Indeed, unless we do the later, our problems will go unsolved, our dreams unfulfilled and we'll know the taste of ashes.

I've put off until last what by no means is least among our problems. Our fiscal situation has a sorry similarity to the situation of a jetliner out over the North Atlantic, Paris bound. The pilot announced that he had some news for the passengers - some good, some bad - said I'll give you the bad news first. We've lost radio control and contact; compass and altimeter are not working; we don't know our altitude, our direction or where we're headed. And then he said - now for the good news - we've got a 100 mile an hour tailwind and we're ahead of schedule.

Our fiscal year began July 1st and it will end on the coming June 30th six months from now. The present budget for this 12-month period is 4 billion 600 million dollars, an all-time high among the 50 states. When this budget was presented, it was admittedly in excess of the estimated tax revenues for the year. It was adopted with the assurance that a change in bookkeeping procedures would solve this imbalance.

With a half a year gone, and faced now with the job of planning next year's budget, we have an estimate provided by the experienced personnel of the Department of Finance. We have also an explanation of how the change in bookkeeping could seemingly balance a budget that called for spending $400 million more than we would take in.

Well, very simply, this was just another one-time windfall - a gimmick - which solved nothing but only postponed the day of reckoning. It was done by financing this 12 months of spending with 15 months of income. Virtually all the revenues from the first quarter of next year - for the months of July, August and September - are being used and will be used to finance this years expenses up to June 30th. And incidentally even that isn't enough, we'll still have an estimated deficit as it looks now of some $63 million.

Now, with this budget established at the present level, we're told that it, of course, must be increased for next year to meet the added problems of population growth and inflation. But the magic in that changed bookkeeping is all used up. We now are back to only 12 months income for 12 months spending for next year. And almost automatically we're being advised, of all the new and increased taxes which, if adopted, would solve this problem. And curiously enough, another one-time windfall is being urged upon us. If we will switch to withholding of personal income tax, we can collect next year two years taxes in one and postpone our moment of truth. Postpone it perhaps until everyone forgets we didn't cause that problem we only inherited it. Or maybe they hope that by next year or the year after, a rich uncle will die and remember us in his will.

Well if we accept the present budget as absolutely necessary and add on the projected increases plus funding for property tax relief (and let me parenthetically say, I believe this is absolutely essential that we and we are preparing a detailed and comprehensive plan for property tax relief) But if all these things are added in, our deficit for the coming year could reach three-quarters of a billion dollars.

But you Californians, we Californians are already burdened by a combined state and local tax that is $113 higher than the national average. Our property tax contributes to the slump in the real estate and building trades industries and it makes it well nigh impossible for many citizens to continue owning their own homes.

For many years now, you and I been shushed like children and told there is no simple answer to the complex problems which are beyond our comprehension.

Well, the truth is, there are simple answers, there just are no easy answers. The time has come for us to decide whether collectively we can afford everything and anything we think of simply because we think of it. The time has come to run a check and see if all the services that government provides were an answer to our demands or were they just goodies dreamed up for our supposed betterment. The time has come to match outgo to income, instead of doing it always the other way around.

Now the cost of California's government is too high; and it adversely affects our business climate. We have a phenomenal growth, hundreds of thousands of people are joining us each year. Of course the overall cost of government must go up to provide necessary services for these people, but growth should mean increased prosperity and thus a lightening of the load which each individual must bear. If this isn't true, then you and I should be planning how we can put up a fence along the Colorado River and seal our borders.

Well, we aren't going to do that. We are going to squeeze and cut and trim until we reduce the cost of government. Now it won't be easy, nor will it be pleasant, and it will involve every department of government, starting with the Governor's office. I have already informed the Legislature of the reorganization we hope to effect with their help of the executive branch and I have asked for their cooperation and support.

The new Director of Finance is in complete agreement that we turn to additional sources of revenue only if it becomes clear that economies alone cannot affect a balanced budget.

Disraeli said, "Man is not a creature of circumstances. Circumstances are the creatures of men." Well, you and I are going to shape our circumstances to fit our needs.

Let me reaffirm a promise I made during the campaign, in all those months of campaigning. I believe in your right to know all the facts concerning the people's business. Independent firms are making an audit of the state finances, I believe the first time this has ever been done. And when that audit is completed, you'll have it. And you'll have all the information you need to make the decisions that must be made. This is not just a problem of this administration; it's a problem for all of us, and all of us to solve together. And I have confidence. I know that you can face any prospect and do anything that has to be done as long as you know the truth of what you're up against, and you'll have that truth

We'll put our fiscal house in order. And as we do, we'll then build those things we need to make our state a better place in which to live and we'll enjoy them more, because we know we can afford them and they're paid for.

If some of you glanced up at the flag today that's here on the platform, you might have been puzzled by its rather small size on this particular occasion. Well there is an explanation. That flag was carried into battle in Vietnam by young men of California. Many of those men will not be coming home. One did, grievously wounded, Sergeant Robert Howell is with us here today. He brought that flag back to us. They were proud enough to carry it, and I thought we'd be proud to have it fly here at the Capitol on this occasion today.

Sergeant, that flag might even serve to put our problems in better perspective. It might remind us that we need to give our sons and daughters a cause to believe in and banners to follow.

No generation has fought longer and harder for freedom or paid a higher price than ours. But the fulfillment of our destiny demands more. We can make this way of life we call a state, we call California, a place of unlimited opportunity, a golden dream for all who have the courage to dare.

If this is a dream, it's a good dream, and it's worthy of our generation and is worth passing on to the next. This is the eventual fulfillment of our destiny. I have every confidence that we, a little ahead of the Sergeant's generation, a little older, who have lived through three wars and a cataclysmic depression, I believe that we're capable of fulfilling our destiny. We can pass this dream on, so worthy of us and worth passing on to the next.

And all we should make our mind's up to today is: Let this day mark the beginning of that fulfillment.







Date
01/05/1967

 

[right]

Communism in action
This is an article by
Human rights watch
Cuba: Fidel Castro’s Record of Repression
Misguided US Embargo Provided Pretext for Abuse

(Washington, DC) – During his nearly five decades of rule in Cuba, Fidel Castro built a repressive system that punished virtually all forms of dissent, a dark legacy that lives on even after his death.

Fidel Castro.Click to expand Image
Fidel Castro. © 2016 Reuters

During Castro’s rule, thousands of Cubans were incarcerated in abysmal prisons, thousands more were harassed and intimidated, and entire generations were denied basic political freedoms. Cuba made improvements in health and education, though many of these gains were undermined by extended periods of economic hardship and by repressive policies.

“As other countries in the region turned away from authoritarian rule, only Fidel Castro’s Cuba continued to repress virtually all civil and political rights,” said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch. “Castro’s draconian rule and the harsh punishments he meted out to dissidents kept his repressive system rooted firmly in place for decades.”

The repression was codified in law and enforced by security forces, groups of civilian sympathizers tied to the state, and a judiciary that lacked independence. Such abusive practices generated a pervasive climate of fear in Cuba, which hindered the exercise of fundamental rights, and pressured Cubans to show their allegiance to the state while discouraging criticism.
Raúl Castro speaks at a rally in Camagüey, Cuba, in July 2007, a year after being handed power by his ailing brother, Fidel Castro (depicted in the bas-relief in the foreground).Click to expand Image
Raúl Castro speaks at a rally in Camagüey, Cuba, in July 2007, a year after being handed power by his ailing brother, Fidel Castro (depicted in the bas-relief in the foreground). © 2007 Jose Goitia/The New York Times/Redux Pictures

Many of the abusive tactics developed during his time in power – including surveillance, beatings, arbitrary detention, and public acts of repudiation – are still used by the Cuban government.

Castro came to power in 1959 after leading a revolution that toppled the corrupt and abusive government of Fulgencio Batista. He ruled by decree until 1976, when a new constitution – whose drafting he oversaw – reformed the structure of the government. From that time until he transferred power to his brother Raúl in July 2006, Fidel Castro held all three of the most powerful positions in Cuba’s government: president of the Council of State, president of the Council of Ministers, and first secretary of the Cuban Communist Party. Fidel Castro did not officially relinquish his title as president of the councils of state and ministers until February 2008, and stepped down as first secretary on April 19, 2011.

Cuba made important advances under Castro in the progressive realization of some economic, social, and cultural rights such as education and healthcare. For example, UNESCO has concluded that there is near-universal literacy on the island, and the country either met the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that the UN established in 2000, or came close by the 2015 deadline.

The progress on economic, social, and cultural rights was never matched in terms of respect for civil and political rights. The denial of fundamental freedoms throughout Castro’s decades in power was unrelenting, and marked by periods of heightened repression, such as the 2003 crackdown on 75 human rights defenders, journalists, trade unionists, and other critics of the government. Accused of being “mercenaries” of the United States government, the individuals were summarily tried in closed hearings. Many served years in inhumane prisons, where they were subjected to extended solitary confinement and beatings, and denied basic medical care for serious ailments. More than 50 of the remaining prisoners were released after Fidel Castro handed over power to his brother, most on the condition that they accept exile to Spain.

November 18, 2009
New Castro, Same Cuba
Political Prisoners in the Post-Fidel Era

Download report

Download report with cover


Under Fidel Castro, the Cuban government refused to recognize the legitimacy of Cuban human rights organizations, alternative political parties, independent labor unions, or a free press. He also denied international monitors such as the International Committee of the Red Cross and international nongovernmental organizations like Human Rights Watch access to the island to investigate human rights conditions.

Efforts by the US government during Castro’s rule to press for change in Cuba repeatedly failed. In the 1960s, those efforts took the form of covert military action to unseat Castro, including the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, and multiple botched assassination attempts. President Dwight Eisenhower established the embargo in 1960, which was later expanded by President John F Kennedy and eventually locked in place by the 1996 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act. Also known as “Helms-Burton,” the law prohibits the US president from lifting trade restrictions until Cuba has legalized political activity and made a commitment to free and fair elections. It also prohibits lifting the embargo as long as Fidel or Raúl Castro remains in office.

The embargo imposed indiscriminate hardship on the Cuban population as a whole, and has done nothing to improve the situation of human rights in Cuba. Rather than isolating Cuba, the policy isolated the US. Castro proved especially adept at using the embargo to garner sympathy abroad, while at the same time exploiting it as a pretext to repress legitimate efforts to reform Cuba from within, dismissing them as US-driven and -funded initiatives.

In December 2014, President Barack Obama began a long-overdue shift in US policy, announcing that the US would normalize diplomatic relations with Cuba and ease restrictions on travel and commerce, calling on Congress to consider lifting the embargo. In exchange, the government of Raúl Castro granted conditional release to the 53 political prisoners that it had been holding for between two months and two years.

Nevertheless, the Orwellian laws that allowed their imprisonment – and the imprisonment of thousands before them – remain on the books, and the Cuban government continues to repress individuals and groups who criticize the government or call for basic human rights. Arbitrary arrests and short-term detention routinely prevent human rights defenders, independent journalists, and others from gathering or moving freely. Detention is often used pre-emptively to prevent people from participating in peaceful marches or political meetings.

The two governments restored diplomatic relations in July 2015. In March, President Obama visited Cuba, where he met with President Raúl Castro, as well as with representatives of Cuban civil society. Obama gave a nationally televised address and joint press conference with Castro in which he urged the Cuban government to lift restrictions on political freedoms and reiterated his call for the US Congress to end the economic embargo of the island.

“For decades, Fidel Castro was the chief beneficiary of a misguided US policy that allowed him to play the victim and discouraged other governments from condemning his repressive policies,” Vivanco said. “While the embargo remains in place, the Obama administration’s policy of engagement has changed the equation, depriving the Cuban government of its main pretext for repressing dissent on the island.”

 

[right]

Communists spraypainting a Communists neighborhood.
Were good builds itself up ,evil feeds on evil

 

[Eltitoguay]

January 5, 1967: Inaugural Address (Public Ceremony)
The following speech transcript contains this speech as it was given by then Governor Ronald Reagan. Other text versions online and an earlier version posted by the Library contained a written version released to the press. Reagan made a considerable amount of small edits and added two paragraphs in conclusion to the actual version given.
January 5, 1967

I can't find where he talks about how to flood the poorest neighborhoods in the USA with crack, to finance international far-right armed groups with the money...

...A tactic to eliminate the non-voting or anti-Regan population, typical of the perversions of a Stalin or a Saloth Sar...

Irán-Contra - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre

es.m.wikipedia.org

 

[shiva82]

Personal Offtopic, or the bad thing about having a communist headquarters with bar, on your street...:

NOTICE TO ALL THE COMMUNIST GRAFFITISTS ON MY STREET:

Let's see who the hell was the idiot, starting to graffiti slogans on a street in a humble working-class neighborhood, and to make matters worse on the facade of my little and humble house... And if it was a Bansky...

Banksy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So in the future, and unless you are a Bansky, you are going to graffiti these things in the center of town, in the neighborhood of the bourgeois and wealthy, and if possible on the facades of the local headquarters of the P.P. and from VOX...
View attachment 19073598

Poscript : ...you'll see how some cattails also sting here...

those pussies do not have the balls to do the graffiti where you suggest . they dress up in matching costumes, meet up, chat shit , make zero progress and tag your gaff instead .

 

[shiva82]

why did you not stop them ? you allowed them to pollute your street ?

 

[Eltitoguay]

Heh heh... The second tontorrón that bites, even though there are signs "beware of the bait"...

 

[shiva82]

shabbos goy ruining his own street

 

[shiva82]

to be honest i share most of your concerns , although communism is not the answer and never will be . it is wishful thinking .

i will credit you for being a sincere commie . which is actually quite rare . i have to respect that regardless. you are not the usual champagne socialist at least

 

[Eltitoguay]

Communism in action
This is an article by
Human rights watch
Cuba: Fidel Castro’s Record of Repression
Misguided US Embargo Provided Pretext for Abuse

(Washington, DC) – During his nearly five decades of rule in Cuba, Fidel Castro built a repressive system that punished virtually all forms of dissent, a dark legacy that lives on even after his death.

Fidel Castro.Click to expand Image
Fidel Castro. © 2016 Reuters

During Castro’s rule, thousands of Cubans were incarcerated in abysmal prisons, thousands more were harassed and intimidated, and entire generations were denied basic political freedoms. Cuba made improvements in health and education, though many of these gains were undermined by extended periods of economic hardship and by repressive policies.

“As other countries in the region turned away from authoritarian rule, only Fidel Castro’s Cuba continued to repress virtually all civil and political rights,” said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch. “Castro’s draconian rule and the harsh punishments he meted out to dissidents kept his repressive system rooted firmly in place for decades.”

The repression was codified in law and enforced by security forces, groups of civilian sympathizers tied to the state, and a judiciary that lacked independence. Such abusive practices generated a pervasive climate of fear in Cuba, which hindered the exercise of fundamental rights, and pressured Cubans to show their allegiance to the state while discouraging criticism.
Raúl Castro speaks at a rally in Camagüey, Cuba, in July 2007, a year after being handed power by his ailing brother, Fidel Castro (depicted in the bas-relief in the foreground).Click to expand Image
Raúl Castro speaks at a rally in Camagüey, Cuba, in July 2007, a year after being handed power by his ailing brother, Fidel Castro (depicted in the bas-relief in the foreground). © 2007 Jose Goitia/The New York Times/Redux Pictures

Many of the abusive tactics developed during his time in power – including surveillance, beatings, arbitrary detention, and public acts of repudiation – are still used by the Cuban government.

Castro came to power in 1959 after leading a revolution that toppled the corrupt and abusive government of Fulgencio Batista. He ruled by decree until 1976, when a new constitution – whose drafting he oversaw – reformed the structure of the government. From that time until he transferred power to his brother Raúl in July 2006, Fidel Castro held all three of the most powerful positions in Cuba’s government: president of the Council of State, president of the Council of Ministers, and first secretary of the Cuban Communist Party. Fidel Castro did not officially relinquish his title as president of the councils of state and ministers until February 2008, and stepped down as first secretary on April 19, 2011.

Cuba made important advances under Castro in the progressive realization of some economic, social, and cultural rights such as education and healthcare. For example, UNESCO has concluded that there is near-universal literacy on the island, and the country either met the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that the UN established in 2000, or came close by the 2015 deadline.

The progress on economic, social, and cultural rights was never matched in terms of respect for civil and political rights. The denial of fundamental freedoms throughout Castro’s decades in power was unrelenting, and marked by periods of heightened repression, such as the 2003 crackdown on 75 human rights defenders, journalists, trade unionists, and other critics of the government. Accused of being “mercenaries” of the United States government, the individuals were summarily tried in closed hearings. Many served years in inhumane prisons, where they were subjected to extended solitary confinement and beatings, and denied basic medical care for serious ailments. More than 50 of the remaining prisoners were released after Fidel Castro handed over power to his brother, most on the condition that they accept exile to Spain.

November 18, 2009
New Castro, Same Cuba
Political Prisoners in the Post-Fidel Era

Download report

Download report with cover


Under Fidel Castro, the Cuban government refused to recognize the legitimacy of Cuban human rights organizations, alternative political parties, independent labor unions, or a free press. He also denied international monitors such as the International Committee of the Red Cross and international nongovernmental organizations like Human Rights Watch access to the island to investigate human rights conditions.

Efforts by the US government during Castro’s rule to press for change in Cuba repeatedly failed. In the 1960s, those efforts took the form of covert military action to unseat Castro, including the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, and multiple botched assassination attempts. President Dwight Eisenhower established the embargo in 1960, which was later expanded by President John F Kennedy and eventually locked in place by the 1996 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act. Also known as “Helms-Burton,” the law prohibits the US president from lifting trade restrictions until Cuba has legalized political activity and made a commitment to free and fair elections. It also prohibits lifting the embargo as long as Fidel or Raúl Castro remains in office.

The embargo imposed indiscriminate hardship on the Cuban population as a whole, and has done nothing to improve the situation of human rights in Cuba. Rather than isolating Cuba, the policy isolated the US. Castro proved especially adept at using the embargo to garner sympathy abroad, while at the same time exploiting it as a pretext to repress legitimate efforts to reform Cuba from within, dismissing them as US-driven and -funded initiatives.

In December 2014, President Barack Obama began a long-overdue shift in US policy, announcing that the US would normalize diplomatic relations with Cuba and ease restrictions on travel and commerce, calling on Congress to consider lifting the embargo. In exchange, the government of Raúl Castro granted conditional release to the 53 political prisoners that it had been holding for between two months and two years.

Nevertheless, the Orwellian laws that allowed their imprisonment – and the imprisonment of thousands before them – remain on the books, and the Cuban government continues to repress individuals and groups who criticize the government or call for basic human rights. Arbitrary arrests and short-term detention routinely prevent human rights defenders, independent journalists, and others from gathering or moving freely. Detention is often used pre-emptively to prevent people from participating in peaceful marches or political meetings.

The two governments restored diplomatic relations in July 2015. In March, President Obama visited Cuba, where he met with President Raúl Castro, as well as with representatives of Cuban civil society. Obama gave a nationally televised address and joint press conference with Castro in which he urged the Cuban government to lift restrictions on political freedoms and reiterated his call for the US Congress to end the economic embargo of the island.

“For decades, Fidel Castro was the chief beneficiary of a misguided US policy that allowed him to play the victim and discouraged other governments from condemning his repressive policies,” Vivanco said. “While the embargo remains in place, the Obama administration’s policy of engagement has changed the equation, depriving the Cuban government of its main pretext for repressing dissent on the island.”

But how?!? That the Cuban Revolution ended in a dictatorship? That Stalin was bad, very bad? That Saloh Star was worse?...Damn, I just found out...

Seriously now, because the ridiculous thing you are making is going to escape the earth's gravitational field: if you had bothered to read, you would have only seen a few pages back, multiple articles written by communists, denouncing the same thing and more, but much more expanded and analyzed...

Of course, one thing is for HRW to report the crimes of Castroism, (thanx for tha articule, sincerely) and another is for a human moral filth like Regan, one of the biggest allies of world drug trafficking, to start giving lessons about nothing.

@right : Just like Stalin or Saloth Sar or the "red" dictator you want to look for (you will find many more... But you will find too more Capitalist dictators, for sure, if you want...), they committed immeasurable crimes against Humanity, "your hero and example" Ronald Reagan, democratic president of the democratic USA, and the pack of amoral dogs he surrounded himself with, they rained crack down on their own people and nation, hoping that the national epidemic they knew they were going to unleash would affect only Reagan's non-voting portion of the population; and with the astronomical fortune gained, finance far-right paramilitary/terrorist groups in Central America...

...and supported "other things" in the Middle East...:

...Including the fundamentalist Shiite Islamic fanaticism, that which you so demonize and accuse others of supporting or militarizing: to whom they secretly sold the same weapons that in public, they crowed that they were going to prevent them from acquiring through embargoes..., because those of the Ayatollah Regime are crazy terrorists who with those weapons would kill people with hooves...

Your hero and the pack of riffraff that surrounded him supported and armed the Iranian regime of the Ayatollahs,

 

[Eltitoguay]

to be honest i share most of your concerns , although communism is not the answer and never will be . it is wishful thinking .
i will credit you for being a sincere commie . which is actually quite rare . i have to respect that regardless. you are not the usual champagne socialist at least

Do you want to respect me and, consequently, for me to respect you?:

Well, put all your criticisms of my ideas here, but reason them, or rely on articles, and not with memes or childish stupidities.

And in case it saves you time looking for memes about how bad Mao or Stalin was, you should, if not read the texts, at least read the headlines of the multiple articles (by marxist and comunist authors, by the way) I published on the subject, just a few pages back, as I also told Right.