What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Bigfoot - Legend Becomes Fact?

Porky82

Well-known member
interesting about the invisibility part some in the bigfoot community say they can cloak which sounds about as crazy as the telepathy part. something weird back there reminds me of a hunter who seen something described outta the predator moving moving from tree to tree that same night football game in town crowd seen weird lights in sky

Have you seen the footage of the weird stuff from the Japanese tsunami?

 

right

Well-known member
Resized_20240615_093246.jpeg
Resized_FB_IMG_1718385585345.jpeg



Resized_20240201_162547_29733410822310.jpeg
We took these pictures in Humboldt this year out in the redwoods. This is supposed to be Bigfoot County.

We lived in eureka many years ago, at the time a couple of Karuk Indians told us that there tribe caught a Bigfoot in happy camp
 

big315smooth

mama tried
Veteran
Some of my posts are poking fun, but that one was not. I am skeptical but interested enough to come here and speculate about what people are actually seeing or think they see. Do you not think my points are valid?
all i got from your post was throwing shade your not from states but in translation for you its a subtle way of disrespecting or ridiculing someone. im here posting about bigfoot not fairies or santa also dont want debate the subject im just here to post bigfoot stuff on a bigfoot thread share ideas and speculate wtf are all these thousands and thousands of sighting are all over the world. have a good one
 

big315smooth

mama tried
Veteran
View attachment 19060844 View attachment 19060845


View attachment 19060846 We took these pictures in Humboldt this year out in the redwoods. This is supposed to be Bigfoot County.

We lived in eureka many years ago, at the time a couple of Karuk Indians told us that there tribe caught a Bigfoot in happy camp
remember hearing this few back there was also a hightimes in the late 90's that had norcal bigfoot story init but tried looking it up couldnt findit .. bummer. bigfoot attack story humbolt. tweakers may have been involved so who knows?
 

big315smooth

mama tried
Veteran
View attachment 19060839

Model of Gigantopithecus. Extinct ape species.


If it was taking a crap, the obvious thing would be to collect it as evidence and have it analysed.
big ole guy jeez. definitely a believer of the younger dryas impact theory they say hit 12000yrs ago smoked most large megafauna which led to our little iceage. over hunting theory is bogus. be a different world had it not happened
407458aa.2-3.jpg

megafauna.jpg
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
let's take the teddy roosevelt story and the account from 1942
these accounts well predate the time when sasquatch became a known thing with stereotypical appearance and behavior
and they are by no means alone
people have been describing sasquatch events with a similarity that can be only described as uncanny
so there's something to it
 

big315smooth

mama tried
Veteran
let's take the teddy roosevelt story and the account from 1942
these accounts well predate the time when sasquatch became a known thing with stereotypical appearance and behavior
and they are by no means alone
people have been describing sasquatch events with a similarity that can be only described as uncanny
so there's something to it
add viking explorer lief erikson to that 986AD
c323fc28f08d403c4b9ebd5949aedc4e.jpg

The oldest account of Bigfoot was recorded in 986 AD​

The oldest account of Bigfoot was recorded in 986 AD by Leif Ericson and his men. During their first landing in the New World, the Norsemen wrote about manlike beasts that were “horribly ugly, hairy, swarthy and with great black eyes.”
Among his accounts, Leif told of seeing huge hairy men who towered over him and his men. The “huge hairy men”, according to Leif, lived in the Woods and had a rank odour and a deafening shriek. It should be noted that Leif Ericson and his men describe huge manlike beasts that were loud and foul-smelling and clearly distinct from native peoples. Apparently, Leif had several sightings of the “huge hairy men” before departing the island.

They called the creature “Skellring”. People believe that the creature “Skellring” is what we know today as Bigfoot. This is the earliest recorded encounter with Bigfoot, or Sasquatch.
The Norse word “skellring” is a term of contempt. It means, roughly, a “barbarian.” What is interesting is the word “hairy.” The Norse were a hairy people themselves, big men with matted hair and beards. Why did they remark on the “skellring” being hairy? Was it because they were very much hairier than the Norsemen?
 
Top