I don't think the daredevil analogy works to justify this. Daredevils usually are aware of the danger they're putting themselves in, and open-blasting in a home, or motel, or apartment, is rarely a situation where only one person could get hurt. The actions of an individual rarely just affect the individual. Even if you have one guy blasting alone in his house in the woods, if it blows up the fire department which other taxpayers or volunteers support has to come out to put it out.
I have a hard time articulating this so apologies if this seems offensive - many here in the United States born at a certain time were made to fetishize these ideas of liberty and freedom, and I don't think most people really understand what they mean. They just associate it with that feel-good "'MERICA! DON'T TREAD ON ME!" attitude. The tail is wagging the dog right now; instead of the discussion being centered on the action itself- dangerous open blasting, some of y'all want to justify it for the sake of upholding some John Locke style natural rights of an individual. We're all greatly interconnected and I don't think it's realistic to make strawman arguments about freedom when the evidence shows that the vast majority of these explosions hurt other people and cause damage to the property of others.
I live in city about 100 miles south of Denver. About a month ago a guy burned down his house less than a mile away trying to make oil. What I find strange is that there is no mention of it in any news. Makes me wonder how many crappy neighborhoods, like this one go unreported in mainstream news. I guess poor people have been burning their houses down in drug related incidents for years now. From what I heard he didnt get any manufacturing charges, but arson and endangering children. Every week this year I have searched hash oil explosions/fires. There is almost always a new one.
But Lempriere's lawyer, Jay Berneburg, said federal prosecutors were "forum shopping." He said Lempriere's hash oil production was a "closed-loop system" and was safe. He also said it was part of his medical marijuana operation and was legal under state law.
Only one of the original six state charges would have stuck — that he was in the country illegally, if they had not moved the case, Berneburg said. The other five claimed he violated Washington's Controlled Substances Act, but his operation was legal "so on the state-side, they couldn't prosecute him," Berneburg said.
http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2015/01/09/4069545_british-man-charged-with-manufacturing.html?rh=1
Only one of the original six state charges would have stuck — that he was in the country illegally, if they had not moved the case, Berneburg said. The other five claimed he violated Washington's Controlled Substances Act, but his operation was legal "so on the state-side, they couldn't prosecute him," Berneburg said.
This is so fucked!!! The Feds are not allowed to spend time/money on state legal cannabis business so the local/state bust him with insufficient charges and then bump it up to the Feds. Just happened with rain city in Seattle. The local cops busted him on an "anonymous" tip. It came out months later that the anonymous tip was made by the DEA.