I made a statement about seaweed extracts generally being higher in auxin like bioactivity than cytokin like bioactivity. you asked me where I got that idea from, so I provided a link to a research project that compared several seaweed extracts for cytokin and auxin bioactivity. This research was in agreement with my statement.
You implied the research that i linked was not reputable and provided a research project paper that you said was "real" and you tryed to convince me that it proved that my statement was incorrect. However you did not seem to understand what the research data showed, so I took the time to show you that it in fact agreed with my statement. So now you say that research ( that you brought to the discussion) is bad science and you are preaching to me about believing everything I read to be true.
You admit to never normalizing the data, so you could compare the relative auxin to cytokin bioactivity. You just looked at the picture and assumed it supported your view. (not good science)
Im guessing you are refering to this picture:
There is nothing to sum, the indivdual vertical bars are not different cytokinins, they are diff concentrations of seaweed extract in the bioassay's working solution.
There are 3 different products produced from the species you asked about in the comparison paper. They all 3 have higher auxin than cytokin bioactivity.
You implied the research that i linked was not reputable and provided a research project paper that you said was "real" and you tryed to convince me that it proved that my statement was incorrect. However you did not seem to understand what the research data showed, so I took the time to show you that it in fact agreed with my statement. So now you say that research ( that you brought to the discussion) is bad science and you are preaching to me about believing everything I read to be true.
You admit to never normalizing the data, so you could compare the relative auxin to cytokin bioactivity. You just looked at the picture and assumed it supported your view. (not good science)
Couldn't help but note that you didn't sum the cytokinins (not good science) and you chose to use one of the worst cytokinin sources in your example.
Im guessing you are refering to this picture:
There is nothing to sum, the indivdual vertical bars are not different cytokinins, they are diff concentrations of seaweed extract in the bioassay's working solution.
There are 3 different products produced from the species you asked about in the comparison paper. They all 3 have higher auxin than cytokin bioactivity.