Water quality can make many many problems with foliars.
Avenger, chip in please. I have to catch a plane.
Avenger, chip in please. I have to catch a plane.
Hill, phosphoric acid works better than anything for a P foliar, or you can try MAP or MKP depending on your need for N or K. But I think slownickel's comment about P being in the roots should be factored in...
Plants,
Phosphoric acid applications range from 0.6% to 0.02%.
Tomorrow's foliar day here, I've got plenty of P in the soil but I'd like to foliar some.
The closest food grade Phosphoric acid I could find is a Jug of GH PH Down. It's 16% Phosphoric acid. I got as far as figuring out that Phosphoric acid is 59.4% Phosphorus .594*.16= .09504
so 9.5% Phos or 0-22-0.
What kind of application rate can I pull off?
I had a war with meters and kicked them off my farms for a while (maybe a new full box of em on payday) I've got some litmus paper and some PH UP and some Potassium Silicate and some baking soda.
I already have high K so maybe I should sit back and just let them grow? Come up with new plan next time? Stop hijacking this crazy thread? I sent more soil samples and I could even check the brix... Thanks
Anyone know what the application rate is of Sea Stim in smaller indoor amounts? Per gallon perhaps for foliar and root drench applications?
yeah i havent tried going over 10ml either on foliar/drench..
i know when i did 5+ml of each sea stim/shield, micropak, photomag, rejuv, phos, cal per gallon drench i did get some leaf curling and tip burn, with fresh coots mix in my small indoor grow, im sure the outdoor ladies could hang though/
Some of the sellers do have calcium in there high P solutions like iag labs how they do the same
Seems like most of the calcium foliars are aimed at improving the quality of ripening fruit. There is research demonstrating the efficacy of this practice.
I wonder if there is a benefit to calcium foliar even under ideal conditions? I use the IAL calcium foliar. My plants do seem to respond as described in their literature.
Most growers have hollow stems too man come on you can't expect pot growers to understand plant physiology off the bat
Cater,
I would bet more on boron versus calcium on the hollow stem. You can have enough calcium (highly unlikely though) and still have hollow stem on many other crops that I have grown.
Like I said how would you expect them to know that boron is the chauffeur for calcium in to the plant
How do you expect them to understand intricate ionic relationships and how they influence hormone production in the plant
Most growers just buy whatever the guys at the store or their friends or neighbors use. This thread is basically proof of it..
Bro the comprehension failure is on your side.
In fact this thread is the opposite of what youre ranting about. Pretty much everyone here uses science in their garden.