but, as enamored as i am with this superb, lovely stuff i'm about to leave it sobbing in the dust with my other exes. that's right, i selfishly used it for my own needs and then i'm gonna ditch it. another one bites the dust!
quote]
where are you heading now, D9??
my best results with turface were achieved by screening over an aluminum window screen and washing really well. or by a long wash in a cement mixer.
this produces an air filled porosity of 30-35% depending on how well you do it.
i think that 35% is the ideal figure for the ppk. right out of the bag it's about 22%.
so it takes a lot of careful prepping to get the best results. this is not too bad as almost any medium needs some work before using.
but it is also very heavy and sometimes hard to source.
doing a full flood you must have a substance that doesn't float. so thus far only turface and de qualify.
but as we scale up the full flood becomes harder to achieve because of pump and plumbing requirements.
and we have growers here where i am that are reliably getting large, heavy yielding plants using a wave pulse. 2-3 lb+ plants.
using a wave pulse i have grown some nice plants in coco and perlite.
but my friends here are using pumice very successfully with the wave pulse.
where i lived before i could not get bulk pumice but here on the west coast it's sold by the bulk landscape places.
i tested some last year and got an airfilled porosity of about 45% so it's quite a bit more "airy" than turface or de.
but there is a danger in that it is borderline on capillary rise capability and won't be able to back feed the plant. i think 45% is too much.
so yesterday i took a sample from a friends pile that he has screened and washed and got 40%.
i have been reading research papers on plant growth rates using pumice and found that it is the larger pieces that drive up the porosity.
the researchers in one study used 0-4mm, 0-8mm, 2-8mm and 4-8mm particle sizing and got the best overall growth rate with the 0-8mm on three species of plants, none cannabis.
8mm is exactly 5/16" so if you were to screen out everything over 3/8" but not screen the fines as my friend did i think you could get to about 35%.
you would still wash the hell out of it. it's full of dust from crushing and grinding.
i don't know about capillary rise yet but i'm about to check it today. i'll do the sample from my friend first, the 40% sample, and then get some straight from the yard and prep it and check it.
it may be that we would have to add a little coco fiber to it also to increase capillarity.
http://www.profilegrow.com/category-s/100.htm?gclid=CJzQm4GE1MUCFQWUfgodmLwA_w
http://email.swansonrussell.com/profile/037430/documents/Hydroponic-Growth-Medium-Sell-Sheet.pdf
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=298002 most of my plants were grown in turface. try to find a spot on one of them.
"In short, the PPK is a passive wick hydroponics method combined with a quick top feed flash flood. The wick (the pipe filled with media you see sticking down into the lower container) is a fail safe in case the top feed pump were to fail as well as functioning as a mechanism to lower/remove the "perched water table" from your upper container.. leaving an optimal zone for excellent root growth. It also offers some other benefits such as preventing nutes/salts accumulating in the root zone and so forth.. you control the moisture in the upper container both with the water level (set via float valve in your "pulse" rez) and your top feed watering volume/intervals. There is a hydraulic "hook-up" action which occurs during a flash flood of the upper container. As to not starve the feed pump of water it'll suck water back from the plant containers. This in turn sucks tons of oxygen down into the rootzone."
this is one of the best short descriptions of the ppk. credit to icmag member FlowerFarmer. thanks buddy!
the ppk is not a big deal, it's simply a really nice way to grow big, healthy plants with minimum maintenance and hassle. have a nice day!
D9, my plan is to try this system with six to eight ladies that my goal is up to two each with. It seems from my initial read thru that designing for a wave pulse might be easier than trying to get a full flood.
Another wrinkle is that my plants would be coming from a veg zone RDWC system and thus would have quite a beard of roots on them. How BIG a plant can be transplanted into PPK? Currently, I transplant from one RDWC system to another and flip concurrently. This way bloom rooms stay bloom rooms, with no time wasted on veg. Can I maintain this approach?
Av8or is indeed an impressively quick study! It seems he's already solved some of these problems, so I'd be interested in your input too!
D9, my plan is to try this system with six to eight ladies that my goal is up to two each with. It seems from my initial read thru that designing for a wave pulse might be easier than trying to get a full flood.
Another wrinkle is that my plants would be coming from a veg zone RDWC system and thus would have quite a beard of roots on them. How BIG a plant can be transplanted into PPK? Currently, I transplant from one RDWC system to another and flip concurrently. This way bloom rooms stay bloom rooms, with no time wasted on veg. Can I maintain this approach?
Av8or is indeed an impressively quick study! It seems he's already solved some of these problems, so I'd be interested in your input too!
I have to put a 30" plant in her 7 gallon ppk container in the back left behind that vertical light. The Lemons are a little fat in the cola to be bothered to move at all so I'll be lifting over my head while a buddy gently holds the Lemons back. This is the problem with perpetual flower rooms. And bugs, if you don't keep on a regular spray regimen.
Does anyone know how the hose is connected to the PVC in this picture? It looks like just a barb x pipe thread fitting into the PVC but I can't imagine that seals well.
I bought a T fitting and a slip x pipe thread reducer bushing to connect the fill and drain hose for each site. If I can avoid all the glue and expense for the parts, I wouldn't complain.
What you guys are saying about PPK and its lack of transportability is troubling. I'll have to think on this.
No fittings. Use a step bit (unibit) and drill out a 3/4" (maybe 13/16", but start with 3/4 just in case...it's been 8 months since I put mine together). Pop the hose in. You might have to cut the end of the hose at a slight angle to get it to jam in there. But, 8 months down and not a single drop of water even after kicking and stomping on my hoses accidentally almost every day. Whenever you use this neoprene or rubberized hose, don't use fittings.
Does anyone know how the hose is connected to the PVC in this picture? It looks like just a barb x pipe thread fitting into the PVC but I can't imagine that seals well.
I bought a T fitting and a slip x pipe thread reducer bushing to connect the fill and drain hose for each site. If I can avoid all the glue and expense for the parts, I wouldn't complain.
Hi av8or,
Thanks for the reply.
I plan to do it that way with the drain lines into the buckets, however, I'm more interested in the connection at the other ends. I am making a feed loop and drain loop out of PVC that will run around the perimeter of my room. I need to connect a length of hose for feed and a length of hose for drain to the PVC for each module.