thanks for doing the tests and posting the results mr F.
i think that two factors will play into this and the general N conundrum. Sativa roots tend to grow for much longer into flowering than indica roots, and because Nitrogen is made available by microbial action, then as soon as those roots stop growing their ability to take up nitrogen is going to be diminished as they deplete what is available in the existing rootzone- this can be seen easily when a plant gets rootbound, N is the first thing to go short. P on the other hand can be transported to the roots by fungal hyphae so P from the soil mass in general can be delivered to the roots by an efficient process even if the roots have stopped growing.
am i doing it right?Who's got a sexy senescence shot or two to brighten up the thread then? Let's see those 'starving' bitches.
Then they'll wipe out the male gene so we can't make babies. I'm talking about male plants...or am I?monsanto is evil..
agent orange... roundup gmo, suicide genes.. fucking with third world countries and everyone..
they want to own the rights to seeds all food seeds, they also like making resistant strains of weeds to roundup, and instead of farming smart.. they just make people use more water and more and more fucking roundup..
I hate them with a passion.. they are one of the true evils in this world.
..............
Who's got a sexy senescence shot or two to brighten up the thread then? Let's see those 'starving' bitches.
MM, is there a way to see organic N? or total N(organic and available)?
Kinda' weird huh.....H2 is a great indoor "cut only" result. I've since crossed H2 to PPP and BMR...who knows what those seeds hold.Awww. I better not be trying to decipher gene interactions then, I know nothing of DNA changes and colloidals.
High 40's for a couple days......May take her by the end o' the week.looks like a bit of cold weather colouring on that one too capt ?
......
One phenotype has regular square or rectangular patches of cells that die in some of the bud leaves. Everything around them including the plant and leaves with these areas is the picture of health. Strange, only the one phenotype. Seen it once before in this strain.
I'm not feeding these plants. There's no max ionic solutions being added, no phyto-P microbombfunkskunk bottles to be seen anywhere. The microherd is dictating the terms and has been for 6 months with almost two grows completed with no added nutes. There's no measuring cups or spoons here, no carefully contrived mixture of exact ingredients except for three years ago when I closely followed a recipe found here - then promptly added char to it.
The microherd is dictating the terms - and the plant is also dictating the terms. I know there's N in the soil and will prove that (again) shortly, but the plant chooses to remove some leaves anyway. So down bottom it appears to be hungry - up top it appears to be perfect -which is it?
I suspect I will find differing ranges of N in the soil at different parts of the plants life cycle as I continue to test, and the microbes will fix it, or lose it, as the plants needs change. I'm interested in how the N species (ions) might change over a plants cycle as well. We shall see.
The 'critical mass' of soil that MM (or CT guy, sorry fellas) suggests for a bed grow makes great sense when considering the housing the soil provides, and the services provided by it's microbial inhabitants. A critical mass of soil allows for a critical mass of organisms in the soil.
The plants have all they need, still they senesce and undergo abscission and leaf drop. Nature doing its thing, it doesn't need my interference.