gardenfather
Active member
I know this thread is old but any news? id love to hear if things are getting better or got better? and if this method really works
I know this thread is old but any news? id love to hear if things are getting better or got better? and if this method really works
Actually, no.
There are chemical differences
Terpenes can boil-off and oxidize when exposed to the heat of smoking.
THC gets' decarboxylated inefficiently when smoked, much of it gets oxidized and thus, wasted.
There are some new compounds that are created by the burning plant material as well.
They do not exist in unburned weed.
These are the minor differences.
But the main reason that smoking does not shrink tumors is blood levels.
It is physically impossible to get a high enough blood level through smokin vs. ingesting.
Believe me when I say I have tried!
View attachment 138741
Have smoked heavily, for 43 years.
Made my own hash oil in the '60s, but dipped cigarettes in it and toked 'til we fell over.
'bout 5 years ago, I turned up with a little cancer.
The kind that radiation and chemo don't fix because it grows as slow as normal tissue.
The better news is, I can monitor it's approximate mass with a blood test.
Just started making my own Phoenix tears and am taking 120mg. twice a day.
My last test was promising.
Showed slower growth which means a longer "doubling rate", which means a longer survival.
That's all I need it to do, really, it gives me back a normal life expectancy.
(Something else will wear out before the big C can take me down).
Been keeping this on the "down-low" until I have some proof of remission.
(false hope is cruel, yah?)
So, in 6 months I should know if this dosage is effective for my situation.
Either way, bet that I'll document it on ICMag and a few other boards.
Stay tuned.
Aloha,
Weezard
But if I smoke enough, aren't I accomplishing the same effect physically in terms of curing disease?
Not to sound like a broken record, but I would imagine that the act of smoking itself would negate any possible anti-cancerous effects of the cannabinoids. I'm sure there is an argument to be made for why it isn't terribly bad for you to smoke herb in terms of physiological effects, certainly better than cigarettes -- but the bottom line is that smoke is by nature carcinogenic, be it herb smoke, tobacco smoke, burning tires...doesn't matter, literally everything causes cancer if you light it on fire and inhale it. Period, the end.
I don't understand why Rick Simpson promotes this with NAPHTHA. It seems to be very bad for humans. Why not just use food grade butane and food grade 190 proof ethanol. That's what I do.