Well that’s because he’s got a massive propaganda machine to run.
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
-
ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest in October! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
War
- Thread starter Creeperpark
- Start date
I'm guessing that an education would have granted the knowledge of the Balfour Declaration, thusly inhibiting the definition of 1929 as "year zero"... not to mention that the 1880's are the earliest records of conflict.
I'm going to predict that there's a specific reason for this "oversight".
Yeah.
Propaganda.
I'm going to predict that there's a specific reason for this "oversight".
Yeah.
Propaganda.
sure that was a terrorist act like ive said many times but also like i've said, what level of hubris do israelis operate under to not see that the people they are holding against their will, will eventually lash out and do some shit like that. since i've seen finkelstein mention the nat turner comparison i can't unsee it.
Probably you would read the book to understand why he posits 1929 as year 0.
Well some of us would.
I didn't say it didn't make sense.
I can't see either side actually care enough to stop the violence is all.
I see people half a world away with no skin in the game getting fired up enough to call for more murder.
I wouldn't bother listening to any of his words, simply on account of his obvious bullshit title.
I don't think that either side is in the right, I think both sides are willfully hateful and violent, and I know that goes back before 1929.
Anybody who is trying to suggest 1929 as "year zero" of the Palestinian conflict is obviously trying to sell something, or is so misinformed that it would be a waste of life I have granted to dawdle through the BS.
multiple hamas negotiators have been assassinated over the years including ismail haniyeh back in july when they droned him when he was in iran (which was why iran struck back at irael's military base). as it's been said before, if the west including the US is behind israel's decision to keep doing what they're doing even though hamas wants to come to the table and they're being killed for doing so, what do you expect lol. resistance is the only option that i can see and by international law resistance against occupation is justified.
Attachments
Apparently some intellectually dishonest people fail to acknowledge the law that's pretty clear in noting that killing an armed invader/intruder/rapist or those complicit with the intrusion is... shock and awe... not typically considered 'murder' under the law... Unless one is simply bias in favor of the armed invader... in which case they MIGHT stretch definitions to claim that it is.
Karma sucks sometimes for armed assholes who steal others' land, raze homes, rape the victims and murder with impunity, and, as has already been pointed out, the occupier has zero right to claim self-defense, but the occupied, raped and abused DO.
Unpleasant flavor in the mouth? Don't support such assholes.
Just thought that tidbit was missing sorely from the intellectually dishonest arguments to the contrary utilizing buzz words in obviously inappropriate applications.
Karma sucks sometimes for armed assholes who steal others' land, raze homes, rape the victims and murder with impunity, and, as has already been pointed out, the occupier has zero right to claim self-defense, but the occupied, raped and abused DO.
Unpleasant flavor in the mouth? Don't support such assholes.
Just thought that tidbit was missing sorely from the intellectually dishonest arguments to the contrary utilizing buzz words in obviously inappropriate applications.
Hamas killing civilians isn't asking for a sit down.
Resistance is all that either side has for options that they can see.
they assassinated at least one peace negotiator that i know of before Oct 7
in 2018 i think it was the gazans had what they called the 'great march of return' which was a peaceful protest and israel responded by sniping the kneecaps of children.
legally you can't "resist" against the people you're violently occupying lol
Resistance to peaceful coexistence is still resistance.
GenghisKush
Well-known member
This is my guess as to why anyone would identify 1929 as "year zero."
en.wikipedia.org
mmm is right, of course. this ish goes way back to at least the advent of Islam itself.
1929 Hebron massacre - Wikipedia
mmm is right, of course. this ish goes way back to at least the advent of Islam itself.
I'll listen to your delusion of intellectual dishonesty as soon as you acknowledge that I don't support Israel.
okay so how about lebanon? lol how is attacking lebanon resistance from an israeli perspective? please don't say resistance from hezbollah lol hezbollah was founded as a resistance group against israeli aggression.
Resistance to peaceful coexistence.
As part of: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1929_Palestine_riotsThis is my guess as to why anyone would identify 1929 as "year zero."
1929 Hebron massacre - Wikipedia
mmm is right, of course. this ish goes way back to at least the advent of Islam itself.
Pro–Wailing Wall Committee - Wikipedia
The 1929 riots marked the first major outbreak of violence between Arabs and Jews in British Mandate Palestine
so israel is entitled to lebanese land and they have to share? cmon man
When was the last indigenous uprising against occupation in the USA?
