It's as if you don't want to answer my question...
-
ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
War
- Thread starter Creeperpark
- Start date
About as many reasons you have to believe that Lukashenko is not legitimate. More in fact since the dead apparently rise up out of their graves to vote in the US. Never heared that about Belarus.
Last edited:
It's notable that you don't have an answer.
This is not the Biden thread and you have your answer. Here is president of Belarus speaking to an american propagandist.
No you didn't answer.
You danced around the question but did not answer it.
You see, credibility is key in getting people to believe that you have a clue of what you are talking about.
I'm just indicating that you possess the ability to regurgitate others' words, yet seem to be allergic to using your own.
Maybe you could use a bit of introspection and fix whatever it is that's keeping you from answering direct questions directly...??
Or maybe it's part of a pompous ploy to simply ignore whatever you can whilst posting pertinent propaganda...
You danced around the question but did not answer it.
You see, credibility is key in getting people to believe that you have a clue of what you are talking about.
I'm just indicating that you possess the ability to regurgitate others' words, yet seem to be allergic to using your own.
Maybe you could use a bit of introspection and fix whatever it is that's keeping you from answering direct questions directly...??
Or maybe it's part of a pompous ploy to simply ignore whatever you can whilst posting pertinent propaganda...
greyfader
Well-known member
your figures are a little off!
Explained: How Javelin Missiles Help Ukrainians Destroy Russian Tanks
The missiles have been named Javelin because they take the path of the spears thrown in track and field events to attack the enemy.
www.ndtv.com
Corpselover Fat
Active member
“I am the last dictator in Europe”
-Alexander Lukashenko
-Alexander Lukashenko
greyfader
Well-known member
it looks like over 50 t-90's have been destroyed with 15 of them being the t-90m variant.
www.newsweek.com
Video shows Russian T-90 Proryv tank obliterated in Ukrainian strike
Ukraine has boasted it has successfully targeted a number of Russia's most advanced main battle tanks.
www.newsweek.com
ALL IN ONE YES! Since 3 weeks and the annihilation of the secret underground bunker of NATO the yankee babies need diapers three times a day. Russians don't bluff like small Yankee dicks, they haven't even released their entire arsenal yet that the NATO demons are already bathing in their shit!
Sommations hypersoniques
• Quelques précisions importantes de plus sur les engins hypersoniques russes, particulièrement à la lumière de leur emploi opérationnel en Ukraine. • Elles sont données par un expert très appréciés même si peu connu, l’amiral croate à la retraite Davorin Domazet. • Chaque nouvelle approche du...
www.dedefensa.org
Hypersonic mating
Let's expect a text from Alex Crainer, from the site ‘TrendCompass’, this text taken up for the occasion by ‘ZeroHedge.com’. We do not particularly know Crainer, but he intervenes to tell us about a ( specialist little known to the Western media world, and this is a good sign ), retired Croatian admiral Davorin Domazet. Crainer tells us that he holds Domazet for one of the best specialists in technical matters of armaments and technologism, and he compares him to the Russian Andrei Martianov. Like him, said Crainer, he has a great knowledge of advanced mathematics and the science of probabilities.
Obviously, Crainer is impressed by the historical, symbolic or even esoteric context in which it is important, according to Domazet, to place the current conflict which we classify under the name of ’ ‘Ukrisis’. The details that Crainer gives, according to an interview with Domazet, are particularly, – both original, exotic and finally, in the extraordinary context in which we operate, much as credible as the sham that the System press watered us with.
Here are the details, which you have no chance of hearing cited in “ the LCI ” interviews or in “ the columns of the World”; you will have to recognize that they are exhilarating, – we mean exciting for the hypothetical imagination, – in relation to the intensity and the call to extrahuman subjectivity suggested by the current events :
But what interests us essentially is one of the military and technical subjects addressed by the admiral and taken up by Crainer. This is the area of hypersonic weapons, which Admiral Domazet believes to be a formidable strategic revolution and that Russia occupies an indisputable number one place there which gives it a strategic position as it is in the balance of power equation. ( Admiral Domazet's observations that Crainer reports come from a Serbo-Croatian interview on March 17 on the channel ‘Project Velebit’. )
Hypersonic power
We have widely reported the events, – acts, facts & circumstances, – which accompanied Putin's revelation of Russia’s progress in this new area of armaments. This brings us back to March 2018, – five years already, during which the powers of ’ “ West-collective ” have not stoned too much on the subject, contenting themselves above all with dissecting the innumerable doubts which they raise around Russian declarations, even acts themselves.We find on several texts of the period the first data of this event, for example the March 8, 2018, the March 11, 2018, the March 22, 2018, the May 7, 2018, the May 25, 2018, etc., – all these texts from the beginning of this case marked by these questions about the spirit of adaptability and innovations of the West Collectives, of which we obviously know, – today more than ever, – the answers :
• But how did they get left behind in this way ?
• But how did they see nothing coming ?
• But how do they intend to react apart from repeating “ This is another joke from ‘Russiagate’ ” ?
Domazet’s conception is that the tanks were the technology that decisively rocked the First World War, with the air force playing this role for the Second World War. In particular, attack aircraft carrier groups, carrying an air fleet of attacks on the seas, constituted an irresistible offensive system, which has reigned since... Today, he believes, great change: it is the hypersonic who tilts the equation of strategy and balance of forces, – which makes all these weapons outdated and useless, – and of course, and precisely, and how! – attack aircraft carriers...
Domazet’s current concept is that two main fronts are identified in the strategic face-to-face meeting between Russia and the United States. Domazet only takes on a defensive aspect because the problem it addresses is that of “ defense ” ( impossible against hypersonics ). It does not specify, for example, that NATO / USA ABM batteries on the Russian border have the capacity to also fire offensive land-land missiles, which is a source of extreme concern for the Russians and makes these batteries prime targets for Russian hypersonics.
In the meantime, here are the two defensive axes identified by Domazet. But these axes play no role in the “ defense ” against hypersonics due to disabilities ( especially on the US side, anti-hypersonic defense work already underway on the Russian side ),
1 ) to identify and target hypersonics who evolve in maximum avoidance mode ;
2 ) above all, to do anything in front of hypersonic speeds making interception impossible.
This classification of Domazet remains very summary, – but it does not matter for our remarks which concerns only hypersonic.
The ‘Kinzhal’ in Ukraine
Domazet's details on the actual operational use of hypersonic are known by many other sources ( including official ), but not in detail. The ‘ missileKinzal’, generally taken from MiG-31, is the weapon used in Ukraine, at least three times. Its maximum flight speed capacity in hypersonic is between Mach 12 and Mach 15 ( approximately, between 16,000 and 20,000 km / h ). We understand that no defense is currently conceivable and therefore the impunity of ‘Kinzhal’ is total. The advantage of Domazet's statements is that he provides details on two of the three ( at least ) interventions of this missile in Ukraine• On the first strike
It had already been widely reported that a hypersonic missile ‘Kinzhal’ was used at the start of the war. It was truly an operational demonstration of the craft and the capabilities of the hypersonic, made almost a month to the day after the start of the Russian attack. The details given by the admiral are impressive and confirm the tremendous striking capabilities of the machine at full speed at the time of impact.The circumstances described by Admiral Domazet are significantly different from those described when the attack took place.
• Sink ALL US aircraft carriers
Domazet recalls that ‘Kinzhal’ was developed in particular with the express aim of destroying the attack groups of aircraft carriers. Just as it is capable of destroying an underground armored storage warehouse designed to withstand a nuclear strike, it can pierce an aircraft carrier, according to the image of Domazet, « like a hot knife in butter ». The strike power can break an aircraft carrier 90,000 tonnes in half, between front and back, and therefore completely destroy it.Domazet dwells much more on the third strike ( another previous strike concerned a single ‘Kinzhal’ ), which involved six ‘ shots two weeks agoKinzhal’ in a single 70-80 missile strike offensive.
• Dark future
The final details given by Admiral Domazet relate to Russian capabilities and the future, with a completely distant “ West-Solidaire ” which seems incapable of responding seriously to the Russian advance. This can also be imagined and explained when you are busy enough to collapse. In all cases, the description that Domazet makes of it confirms that we have with the hypersonic a new step in climbing, no need to go immediately to nuclear power.
greyfader
Well-known member
in addition, russian new tank production has radically slowed because of a lack of electronic components due to sanctions.
and they are dragging out 60 yr old t-62's and t-54's.
www.forbes.com
and they are dragging out 60 yr old t-62's and t-54's.
Russia’s Best Tank Army Might Have No Choice But To Reequip With 60-Year-old T-62s
Russia’s tank shortage has gotten so dire that the United Kingdom for one believes the Russian army’s best tank formation, the 1st Guards Tank Army, might have to reequip with T-62s from the 1960s or ’70s.
www.forbes.com
Uh... you do understand that the US isn't at war with Russia right?
I've never seen someone so hard for Russian aggression... does it fulfill you somehow?
greyfader
Well-known member
romsy baby, not another fake ass photo! are you a slow learner?Ukronazis in Azovstal Plant Surrender!
View attachment 18823304
In 2022 so now cleaned up ^^
Ukronazis in Azovstal Plant Surrender! — Monomakhos
www.monomakhos.com
once again, all someone has to do is right click on search google images to get the legitimate original source of a photo.
this particular photo originates in some clowns twiiter account. no known photographer, journalist, or news agency is associated with it.
not even russian state media sources. nowhere, nothing except a twitter account.
how desperate you must be to put up unsubstantiated crap like this.
if you can't show the source of a photo it is bullshit.
how about some adult participation from you on this thread?
greyfader
Well-known member
you must have missed this the first time!ALL IN ONE YES! Since 3 weeks and the annihilation of the secret underground bunker of NATO the yankee babies need diapers three times a day. Russians don't bluff like small Yankee dicks, they haven't even released their entire arsenal yet that the NATO demons are already bathing in their shit!
View attachment 18823568
Sommations hypersoniques
• Quelques précisions importantes de plus sur les engins hypersoniques russes, particulièrement à la lumière de leur emploi opérationnel en Ukraine. • Elles sont données par un expert très appréciés même si peu connu, l’amiral croate à la retraite Davorin Domazet. • Chaque nouvelle approche du...Hypersonic mating
Let's expect a text from Alex Crainer, from the site ‘TrendCompass’, this text taken up for the occasion by ‘ZeroHedge.com’. We do not particularly know Crainer, but he intervenes to tell us about a ( specialist little known to the Western media world, and this is a good sign ), retired Croatian admiral Davorin Domazet. Crainer tells us that he holds Domazet for one of the best specialists in technical matters of armaments and technologism, and he compares him to the Russian Andrei Martianov. Like him, said Crainer, he has a great knowledge of advanced mathematics and the science of probabilities.
Obviously, Crainer is impressed by the historical, symbolic or even esoteric context in which it is important, according to Domazet, to place the current conflict which we classify under the name of ’ ‘Ukrisis’. The details that Crainer gives, according to an interview with Domazet, are particularly, – both original, exotic and finally, in the extraordinary context in which we operate, much as credible as the sham that the System press watered us with.
Here are the details, which you have no chance of hearing cited in “ the LCI ” interviews or in “ the columns of the World”; you will have to recognize that they are exhilarating, – we mean exciting for the hypothetical imagination, – in relation to the intensity and the call to extrahuman subjectivity suggested by the current events :
But what interests us essentially is one of the military and technical subjects addressed by the admiral and taken up by Crainer. This is the area of hypersonic weapons, which Admiral Domazet believes to be a formidable strategic revolution and that Russia occupies an indisputable number one place there which gives it a strategic position as it is in the balance of power equation. ( Admiral Domazet's observations that Crainer reports come from a Serbo-Croatian interview on March 17 on the channel ‘Project Velebit’. )
Hypersonic power
We have widely reported the events, – acts, facts & circumstances, – which accompanied Putin's revelation of Russia’s progress in this new area of armaments. This brings us back to March 2018, – five years already, during which the powers of ’ “ West-collective ” have not stoned too much on the subject, contenting themselves above all with dissecting the innumerable doubts which they raise around Russian declarations, even acts themselves.
We find on several texts of the period the first data of this event, for example the March 8, 2018, the March 11, 2018, the March 22, 2018, the May 7, 2018, the May 25, 2018, etc., – all these texts from the beginning of this case marked by these questions about the spirit of adaptability and innovations of the West Collectives, of which we obviously know, – today more than ever, – the answers :
• But how did they get left behind in this way ?
• But how did they see nothing coming ?
• But how do they intend to react apart from repeating “ This is another joke from ‘Russiagate’ ” ?
Domazet’s conception is that the tanks were the technology that decisively rocked the First World War, with the air force playing this role for the Second World War. In particular, attack aircraft carrier groups, carrying an air fleet of attacks on the seas, constituted an irresistible offensive system, which has reigned since... Today, he believes, great change: it is the hypersonic who tilts the equation of strategy and balance of forces, – which makes all these weapons outdated and useless, – and of course, and precisely, and how! – attack aircraft carriers...
Domazet’s current concept is that two main fronts are identified in the strategic face-to-face meeting between Russia and the United States. Domazet only takes on a defensive aspect because the problem it addresses is that of “ defense ” ( impossible against hypersonics ). It does not specify, for example, that NATO / USA ABM batteries on the Russian border have the capacity to also fire offensive land-land missiles, which is a source of extreme concern for the Russians and makes these batteries prime targets for Russian hypersonics.
In the meantime, here are the two defensive axes identified by Domazet. But these axes play no role in the “ defense ” against hypersonics due to disabilities ( especially on the US side, anti-hypersonic defense work already underway on the Russian side ),
1 ) to identify and target hypersonics who evolve in maximum avoidance mode ;
2 ) above all, to do anything in front of hypersonic speeds making interception impossible.
This classification of Domazet remains very summary, – but it does not matter for our remarks which concerns only hypersonic.
The ‘Kinzhal’ in Ukraine
Domazet's details on the actual operational use of hypersonic are known by many other sources ( including official ), but not in detail. The ‘ missileKinzal’, generally taken from MiG-31, is the weapon used in Ukraine, at least three times. Its maximum flight speed capacity in hypersonic is between Mach 12 and Mach 15 ( approximately, between 16,000 and 20,000 km / h ). We understand that no defense is currently conceivable and therefore the impunity of ‘Kinzhal’ is total. The advantage of Domazet's statements is that he provides details on two of the three ( at least ) interventions of this missile in Ukraine
• On the first strike
It had already been widely reported that a hypersonic missile ‘Kinzhal’ was used at the start of the war. It was truly an operational demonstration of the craft and the capabilities of the hypersonic, made almost a month to the day after the start of the Russian attack. The details given by the admiral are impressive and confirm the tremendous striking capabilities of the machine at full speed at the time of impact.
The circumstances described by Admiral Domazet are significantly different from those described when the attack took place.
• Sink ALL US aircraft carriers
Domazet recalls that ‘Kinzhal’ was developed in particular with the express aim of destroying the attack groups of aircraft carriers. Just as it is capable of destroying an underground armored storage warehouse designed to withstand a nuclear strike, it can pierce an aircraft carrier, according to the image of Domazet, « like a hot knife in butter ». The strike power can break an aircraft carrier 90,000 tonnes in half, between front and back, and therefore completely destroy it.
Domazet dwells much more on the third strike ( another previous strike concerned a single ‘Kinzhal’ ), which involved six ‘ shots two weeks agoKinzhal’ in a single 70-80 missile strike offensive.
• Dark future
The final details given by Admiral Domazet relate to Russian capabilities and the future, with a completely distant “ West-Solidaire ” which seems incapable of responding seriously to the Russian advance. This can also be imagined and explained when you are busy enough to collapse. In all cases, the description that Domazet makes of it confirms that we have with the hypersonic a new step in climbing, no need to go immediately to nuclear power.
www.raytheonmissilesanddefense.com/what-we-do/hypersonics?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIiZ2i69X5_QIVdjizAB0o5wE3EAAYASAAEgKc1PD_BwE
gclid=EAIaIQobChMIiZ2i69X5_QIVdjizAB0o5wE3EAAYASAAEgKc1PD_BwE
so everybody has hypersonics now. russia has been cancelled again.
Last edited:
Well, Putin is not a great military leader, he´s an ex-KGB guy. Spies don´t make for good generals.
And their field commanders, prolly too scared not to order human wave attacks because they´ll be next in line if they don´t follow orders. Something has to be done! Plus everyone is most likely telling their superiors what they think they want to hear, not what´s true or real. ´Cause that might upset people, and heads will roll. Also shit will roll, downhill, as it does. So everyone is scared of failing, or even reporting failures. But if you make-believe everything is good and going according to plan. Then hey! Maybe it is. It´s just other people dying and there´s no progress. But that´s no ones fault, because they are just following orders.
And it has always been the main Russian tactic, send more troops to be slaughtered because chances are the enemy will run outta bullets before they run outta men.
That´s the "advantage" of a nation of some 150 million people going to war against smaller, less populated countries. And at this point, what else can they do, really?
They went in cocky, in winter time, thinking they´ll just steam roll thru Ukraine with numbers and power advantage and not face too much resistance.
Whoops!
The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of a million is a statistic.
- Stalin
Last edited:
Shut up clowns and buy your VPN to inform yourself, brain zombie gang of Icmag lol may soon you'll learn to grow pure sat to exorcise yourself.
Pure sativas take too long and yield wispy buds and the high isn't enjoyable for me most of the time.
The only thing pure sativa exorcises is time that can be spent flowering yield that's easy to trim and not uncomfortable to smoke.
I recall asking you exactly what gets you so giddy about Russian aggression...
Did you want to weigh in on that, or maybe just tell me to shut up and grow strains that don't suit my taste??
St. Phatty
Active member
If this is what NOT being at war looks like - what does being at war look like ?
* Blowing up Pipelines
* Seeding Senior Terrorists (CIA) - with satellite info - among proxy forces (Ukraine)
* Providing $10+ Billion worth of military arms to proxy forces.
* Providing Radiological weapons (Dirty Bombs) to proxy forces.
That's EXACTLY what being at war looks like.
Can the Russia-China-Iran alliance beat the US Terrorist Alliance ?
I suspect that the performance (or non-performance) of American airplanes - F22, JSF - will play a role.
How big a deal is it if Russia and China are able to disable the F22 & JSF/F35 ?
RobFromTX
Well-known member
Blasphemy mustard! The south american sativa varieties pump out a lot more weight and have a much more pleasant effect than african or thai. I get where youre going with flowering times though
I do like Santa Marta....
