Pretty informed opinion from someone who's only contribution has been to punch the YES selection on a ballot.
Write him yourself and see how the pos answers.
Believe it or not Jhhnn, it's liberating and kinda fun to open your eyes and think for yourself instead of swallowing the cum off the spoon your party of choice is so happy to feed you.
But I will agree, the 2 you listed are just as bad for the country, yup, just as bad as Reid and Pelosi have been on the other side.
Say what you want, but recent votes in Congress wrt cannabis tell us who's with us, who's against us, and who might be persuadable. That falls almost entirely along party lines.
Be honest about it. Deal with it. "They're just as Bad!" is a cop-out.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/05/30/marijuana-wins-us-house-vote-for-first-time
The amendment won surprisingly strong approval in a 219-189 vote that blurred party lines.
................Forty-nine Republicans voted for the amendment and just 17 Democrats - including Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz - voted against it.
........................
The amendment does not make marijuana legal under federal law, but if it survives the Senate and President Barack Obama signs it into law, it would deny the Drug Enforcement Administration and federal prosecutors the ability to investigate, prosecute and incarcerate people complying with state medical marijuana laws.
That's a strawman argument, because that's not what Bob said.
He said, I believe, that if big Agra's entry into the weed market gives us the right to get high & grow our own in peace & privacy then it's worth it to keep people out of jail. They can have their piece of it if the vast, vast majority gets a fair shake at the other end.
As monsoon offers, if you want more out of it than that, you'll need to nut up & take your chances, same as it ever was.
Hell, it's the only way that there's any money in it at all. It has to be illegal at some level or another to hold up prices. Otherwise growing pot would be like growing tobacco, currently fetching farmers ~$2/lb hand cut, bundled & trucked to market.
is that really what you want? Do you think it would be better if there was one big corporation that produces every consumer item, or should there be a few big corporations?
What are you talking about? I asked a questiom. Not wveryone is here to argue. I hate when people cant understand the difference.
No not a cop out. He's correct.
You might want to reevaluate which side is for it and against it.
Something to keep an eye on in the senate.
Unless he was sitting right there when the vote was taken he won't believe it. Probably ask for a recount. He's been sucking the Demodick so long he wouldn't know which end was up if they slapped him in the face with it. Gooood little democrat with no original thought just what they tell him to believe.
Jhnn and resinryder: Your both as delusion as the Bush family if you think this congress or the next on will ever budge on the issue. .
What were you saying about that vote?
Vote totals & percentages in my previous post.
Simply saying you were mistaken would be entirely acceptable. Nobody's right all the time.
Sellout? only in some truly twisted understanding of reality. Stickin' it to the man? Why bother when we made it so that he can't fuck with us? We got around all that, declared Peace in the Marijuana War, Peace on each other. We also get to disown the lyin', cheatin' stealin' & abusive psychopaths who've supplied much of what we've consumed while preying on the community in a variety of ways. Those who want to live with the outlaw code of silence can still play that game if they want.
I think it'll just get better from here.
Agreedthe 2 party paradigm is a major part of our problem.
When 91% of Dems voted for it & only 22% of Repubs, it proves my point entirely. Our friends in Congress line up largely (not completely) along party lines.
Sheesh.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2014/roll258.xml