TWO S1 LINE PRODUCES MALES

[Tom Hill]

though as I eluded to earlier, I am quite sure you repressed these truths as you were breeding your tri's, these are the truths that are spilling and spewing here and now.

 

[GMT]

tell it as it really is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwOMnIuAGOY
within a strain line yes, accross the entire species no

 

[Tom Hill]

breeding tri's lol, well, I guess it's something.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njG7p6CSbCU

 

[LAION]

Peyote S1 "male" crossed to various strains produces females only. Buddy pollinated few strains with s1 male pollen and so far all have turned out to be females( 30-35 plants).
But this been known since the beggining , eh .

 

[Tom Hill]

... if you wanna be like the folks on the hill.....

 

[GMT]

203, fave song ever linked,

I got further with it than anyone else has. And using classical methods, with the male female still in tact, no selfing resorted to. And the smoke is still the one I want more than any other. If that's wasting my time, hows it hurt anyone? By them thinking tri's are better than bi's? How is that diff than people supporting diff sports teams? Aren't we all just fans of the same game?

 

[Tom Hill]

thank you LAION, I knew there was a thread in here somewheres

 

[Tom Hill]

GMT, I thought it was plain my headache, as far as who it is hurting. I browse the boards only to find this huge ignorant nevil like clan talking about how 3 is better than two. You did that, back it the fuck up, or take it back, or deliver with more grains of salt because bullshit is the product. We have to look at that bullshit, cut it out, cease, desist. Not with the program, but with the parts of it that are clearly wrong, the parts that are getting through, and making eyes, twitch..

 

[Tom Hill]

ie, 3 is not better than two, so how's that smoke, and only how's that smoke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXpwOM6bHdI

 

[GMT]

embrace it or battle it, but dont be afraid of it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcgT-7dXZ20
I'm rather proud that you feel that is down to me. Thankyou.
But please, provide some evidence or at least an argument that justifies your position beyond "we have both produced plants that spend too much effort on leaves, except one of us sells them and one doesn't". As at least for each of those "wasted" efforts there is a new point from which a bud can grow on my line. How that is a bad thing?

 

[GMT]

don't hate me for it Tom http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqyXO9Ko1s0

 

[Tom Hill]

I have reviewed and embraced the evidence for 27 years now, on what you guys might agree was a rather large scale. I have told you like it is, there is no advantage to 3 over two. And yes, that people have removed their eyes from things like actual cellular reproduction rates during this madness gets under my skin, sue me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XCVnV5CGh0

I have not failed here to make my point, I don't think, brother..

 

[GMT]

well, if it was just the leaves, then I guess I'd be forced to agree with your central point, but for me its about the extra branches. I'm an indoor grower, not an outdoor guy, height is an issue for me, so having more growth points within a height restriction, is something I'm genuinely struggling to see as a bad thing. The problem as I see it now, is that I prefer indicas, and how do I defend them against sativas which dont suffer the same problem with cellular reproduction? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyQ4QSsERxM

 

[Tom Hill]

those extra branches cost you energy in other places, is the truth of the matter, surely you understand this concept. Listen I see "vigor" differently than you do apparently, I see sallies multiplying at the same rate as the broad leaves. I was under the assumption that we were amongst folk who understand what the fuck they are looking at.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCTKwF-NW4c

 

[Tom Hill]

weigh them at anytime during there lives, roots and all, then get back to me about vigor, or suffering, or etc, get with this, you spend your mind and energy of this, I and mine spend my energy on that, simple, ancient maths..

 

[GMT]

well I assume that you realise the leaves are what captures that energy in the first place. The more material there is to capture, the more the plant has to work with. Do you feel Im missing something there? That's a straight Q, if I am, then educate me please, if you're successfull I'll drop the tri thing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrThDHQ1am0

 

[Tom Hill]

sweet jah believe you me I wish I could end it here and now but alas,,, We are speaking of ground rules, when in fact this plant is more adept at producing energy than that plant, regardless of solar panels and etc, so fuck, give me another way to end it, lol, you fucking heard me before, bathe in it, know it to be the truth. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifb623PBIIs

 

[Tom Hill]

the tri thing, was is and will always be an extremely narrow look into things, this is the news on top of that pizza baby.

 

[GMT]

Thing is Tom, I believe in comparing like with like rather than grapes to coconuts. All I can tell ya is that a tri pheno will out produce a bi pheno within my one line when left single cola. Now a multi topped bi or a well scrogged bi would out produce a single cola tri, but to talk about my line v another line or even worse, a plant in my home v a plant in someone else's home, or worse still v something outside, just isn't worth comparing at all. Its not a valid comparrison whether mine came out on top or at the bottom of the pile. For you to argue against that, seems pointless to me, as I'll say it again, I've seen it, you haven't. What others feel, or what the future will see as obvious is all a guess http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FgSmdfRUus

 

[Tom Hill]

come on dude, don't do it, please don't do it, you've spent no small amount of time pushing rocks uphill. Be it this or dh lines, your thoughts have been checked, embrace that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEMhJoXOFeU