no. our democracy depends on having at least two functional competing parties. there are no circumstances in which a single party is good for a nation. the Chump "wing" is not as large as he, or many of us, think it is. he may get their nomination simply because of the large number of aspirants to his "throne" though. he has zero chance of being elected again in my honest opinion. unless prisons hold elections for some odd reason...
newrepublic.com
Can’t be gay but can be starving. That's a solid platform right there.
You forgot giving the rich money as well. Us common folk need to support the rich more than the military.
i don't think they are intentionally cruel; but that is the inevitable end result when your only concern is lowering your own taxes...if they (or their friends) didn't have to pay for it, they'd be okay with it, if not trying to get in line for free food themselves. got a church/food bank nearby that hands out frozen chicken weekly regardless of your circumstances. it would piss you off to see some of the cars that pull in...Republicans are once again showing that the cruelty is the point.
Republicans Declare Banning Universal Free School Meals a 2024 Priority
As states across the country move to make sure students are well fed, Republicans have announced their intention to fight back.
He's going to be screaming "Election Interference!!" from inside his cell.
i said that months ago. now, i'd be okay if he flew the coop & went to live with Un or Putin. the North Korean people would probably butcher and eat his fat ass if he went outside. in Russia, he'd probably fall down a flight or three of steps, or stumble and go out of a window, lol. gotta be scary to see reality setting in...
From all the reporting I've heard there is nothing on the law books that prevents him from being President just because he is locked up. We even almost had precedent for it once back in the 1920's with Eugene V. Debs and again in 1992 with Lyndon LaRouche both of which ran for President from behind bars. Fortunately neither of them were elected so we never had to deal with how a convict would serve as President. I agree with you that we do need more then one party but I doubt the prospect of it not being good for the country would necessarily stop the democrats from seeing if it were possible. There are more then just the two parties though and so it would never truely happen one of the other parties would take the place of the republican party or the few sane establishment Republicans would reform a new version of the Republican party that would be more like what most of us remember the old Republican party being. You're correct though that the Chump wing isn't nearly as big as many seem to think it is and with spokes people like MTG and Boebert routinuely embarrassing themselves and the party it's getting smaller all the time.no. our democracy depends on having at least two functional competing parties. there are no circumstances in which a single party is good for a nation. the Chump "wing" is not as large as he, or many of us, think it is. he may get their nomination simply because of the large number of aspirants to his "throne" though. he has zero chance of being elected again in my honest opinion. unless prisons hold elections for some odd reason...
Speaking of Reality, I say we should be considering how the Trump administration handled the case of Reality Winner, a former intelligence contractor who served more than four years in prison for leaking a classified report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. She had just one count of mishandling a classified document and her reason for doing what she did was to get information out to the American people that she felt was being kept hidden from them. She served almost 5 years and is still restricted to her home state of Texas until her probation ends in 2024.
I can't tell the difference between the two. I don't divide humanity into the good and the bad 'side'. I don't do this because it leads to feeling superior to another 'side'. You can substitute 'side' for 'race', 'religion', 'social caste', etc... and perhaps you can start to see where I am coming from. Or you can smugly sit there and feel superior to your fellow man, but that doesn't sound very reasonable to me.
