sometimes, honest men are nominated for the bench, too! not often, but...
-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
Trump thread part 2 (Or anything else we want to talk about that's ridiculous in politics today)
- Thread starter GOT_BUD?
- Start date
Hopefully only Trump feels stung by that. I mean I would like to believe anyone smart enough to pass the Bar and become a lawyer is also smart enough to realize a Federal Judge isn't going to risk their position and reputation over some misplaced sense of loyalty to the President who appointed them....well at least not those who earned the right to be appointed as a Federal Judge.
that one landed pretty close by the Honorable Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida...
They probably won't get paid and will risk their law licenses.
but think o
but think of the great publicity they get from being associated with such an incredible winner...
Yup, nothing like a little extra street cred when you're in the clink.but think o
but think of the great publicity they get from being associated with such an incredible winner...
It was because of her that I had to qualify my statement by saying, "....well at least not those who earned the right to be appointed as a Federal Judge."that one landed pretty close by the Honorable Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida...
That would be my first pick but if it leads to indictments I'd also like to see Lindsey Graham in the mix. I'm just so tired of him going back and forth on what positions he'll take that i'd like to see something at least put a little fear in him at a minimum or better yet take him out of office completely. I may not like a Republican politician that has a certain set of beliefs and values and stands by them but I can respect them for standing for those beliefs and values. Lindsey Graham is one that I can't stand and I have no respect for.
Could be the reason for the limited information release, just to see how the rats scurry.
A few warrants for data acquisition as the man who could shoot someone in Time square steps in the noose.
if only there was a clever three word phrase that could be chanted by a crowd that would express my feelings on this...
just spit balling here....lock him up! lock him up!
kinda catchy,i feel like i've heard something similar before for a far stupider reason
just spit balling here....lock him up! lock him up!
kinda catchy,i feel like i've heard something similar before for a far stupider reason
i'll put my dollar on "all of them"...boy, if a judge can see through your bullshit, the party is over. i've never read about one addressing a situation like that. wow!
he's already begging folks for money to pay his legal bills...LOL!
No the reason for the limited information is as they say because of the potential for those to be indicted to claim that they were denied due process, which is legitimate. They want to make sure when they prosecute those indictments there are no loopholes they can squirm out of on appeal. If they prosecute some of the lower level people like Rudy or Graham or Meadows and there are no loopholes to squirm out of them they stand a better chance of getting someone to flip on the bossman in exchange for a deal. Either way Trump's got to be pretty worried, they've been saying for months now that the GA case is pretty rock solid because they got Trump committing the crime on tape, and of course being a state level case there is no chance of someone down the road granting Trump a pardon. Although with the way things are going for the Republicans I don't see them having a shot at the White House until 2028. Then again I thought Trump didn't stand a chance in 2016.
Well he did learn from his Maste...I mean the Master.
comfy markoth
Well-known member
the only way for him to win was for a large portion of the electorate to tell Hillary what they thought of her, and for her to run the worst campaign in political history. both, obviously, happened simultaneously.
True and yet even then he still lost the popular vote by around 3 Million if I remember correctly. I also wonder if there would be any value in going back and investigating the election results of 2016 since Trump played the same game of putting the idea out there before the results were in that the election might be stolen from him. I mean we all know Trump has a habit of accusing people of the things he's guilty of. I guess there is no real point since that election is so far in the past and Trump is no longer in office.the only way for him to win was for a large portion of the electorate to tell Hillary what they thought of her, and for her to run the worst campaign in political history. both, obviously, happened simultaneously.
it's too bad hypocrisy doesn't have a level where it becomes toxic...aside from them losing/selling their souls
