Tom Hill Haze

[acespicoli]

I was raised to stand up for people with these problems
Any one of the people here getting banned could be self medicating

Social communication and interaction skills can be challenging for people with ASD.
I like Tom a shame there aint a vote...
if someone dont like it unwatch his thread or hit the ignore button

 

[Chi13]

Am I the only one surprised that Tom wasn't banned earlier? He has been given way more freedom than any other member that I can think of. He came on daily and put shit on the site owner, and other members. It's been entertaining for the most part, but I am glad I missed the offending picture that he got banned for.

I will miss the haze drama and hope he comes back but I can't knock his banning in this instance.

 

[manohman]

Am I the only one surprised that Tom wasn't banned earlier? He has been given way more freedom than any other member that I can think of. He came on daily and put shit on the site owner, and other members. It's been entertaining for the most part, but I am glad I missed the offending picture that he got banned for.

I will miss the haze drama and hope he comes back but I can't knock his banning in this instance.

Fair enough.

 

[acespicoli]

Am I the only one surprised that Tom wasn't banned earlier? He has been given way more freedom than any other member that I can think of. He came on daily and put shit on the site owner, and other members. It's been entertaining for the most part, but I am glad I missed the offending picture that he got banned for.

I will miss the haze drama and hope he comes back but I can't knock his banning in this instance.

Glad I missed it then I guess the offending picture that he got banned for.
Actually offend me I like it lets me know my weakness was it his beer can knee knocker ?

 

[exoticrobotic]

Always glad to wake up at 3am and see snippets of information gold from Tom re his haze runs and haze traits.

Wasn't glad seeing those pics and not surprised he was banned posting them

He obv. wanted to be banned

 

[acespicoli]

now were getting somewhere

 

[Vegg69guerilla]

shit man..what I miss...lolol

 

[acespicoli]

your gonna have to tell me about it tom when you get back

 

[Vegg69guerilla]

OK, Tom been chatting bollocks again...lol

 

[acespicoli]

Tom... wtf dude

 

[da kine]

Have we really gotten to a point where we're posting graphic photos of injured dogs to try to one-up another forum poster? I'm no candyass, I'm no stranger to death or injury in humans and animals, but it's not necessary, especially in this forum.

It's one thing to take a cold attitude towards working dogs and animals that they have a role to function and are not pets. It's another to embrace being callous towards their suffering or their neglect to try to showboat your masculinity, or to suggest that people who *feed their dogs* are somehow the epitome of softness. I try to ignore the interpersonal squabbling that goes on, but this is getting beyond fucked. Keep your seeds, Tom.

 

[da kine]

Worked in and around health care for a significant portion of my adult life. Several years of which were in the ER.
I have seen, felt , touched, and smelled far worse than any image depicts. You indicate that you have an avocation involving the abomination called warfare. To me, that is far different than viewing an image of any living thing, or any animal, that may have very likely sustained an injury, in and of its own doing, contracting a bacterial infection, a disease, or even cancer, as a result. I have seen all of these up front, and it is simply a grown up experience. The animal image could have been of it running free without any due health care. There is no way of knowing if anyone promoted or cause this, or that it even involved neglect, whatsoever. It was just a picture. Maybe not something you yourself have experienced, but a matter of fact of adult life. Certainly did not appear, to my trained eyes, to have been anything to call the secret service about. Especially since you have no post images to compare what you saw to, in order to draw any neglect inference from. Perhaps that animal got some health treatment after all. Don't know. And, very obviously, you don't know either. I see people posting video images of people dying, which I personally do not care for, or find respectful. But they are there, and it is part of being an adult. I like to say: Take the best, and leave the rest. If you don't care for a topic, or image, perhaps best to shuffle on. Nothing there to get arrested over.

 

[Chi13]

Worked in and around health care for a significant portion of my adult life. Several years of which were in the ER.
I have seen, felt ,touched, and smelled far worse than any image depicts. You indicate that you have an avocation involving the abomination called warfare. To me, that is far different than viewing an image of any living thing, or any animal, that may have very likely sustained injury in and of its own doing, contracted a bacterial infection, a disease, or even cancer as a result. I have seen all of these up front, and it is simply a grown up experience. The animal image could have been of it running free without any due health care. There is no way of knowing if anyone promoted or cause this, or that it even involved neglect whatsoever. It was just a picture. Maybe not something you yourself have experienced, but a matter of fact of adult life. Certainly did not appear, to my trained and experienced eyes, to have been anything to call the secret service about. Especially since you have no post images to compare what you saw to, in order to draw any neglect inferences about. Perhaps that animal got some health treatment after all. I don't know. And likely you don't know either. I see videos of people posting images of people dying, which I personally do not care for, or find respectful. But they are there, and it is part of being an adult. I like to say take the best, and leave the rest. If you don't care for a topic, or image, perhaps best to shuffle on. Nothing there to get arrested over.

This is a cannabis grow site.

 

[da kine]

And there are bird images still on this thread, and were several images, from several people, posting images of dogs.

 

[da kine]

This is a cannabis grow site.

And neither this person :

KidCharlemagne​

Nor you:

Chi13​

Or me:

da kine​

was directly on point to the topic you allude to at hand. Sometimes topics wander. Did you ever ever get high?

P.S. And, just for education's sake, here is a thread devoted to just about any living creature imaginable, on this strictly "cannabis grow site" : Post your Pets!

 

[Chi13]

And there are bird images still on this thread, and were several images, from several people, posting images of dogs.

It's pretty self evident the kind of images that are appropriate for this family friendly site. I don't come on here for gore or other disturbing images. There are other sites for that.

 

[da kine]

I come here strictly because this is an adult site. Cannabis isn't for family gathered elementary aged school children. As I posted earlier: It behooves us, if we're wise, to avoid combative behavior. To take the best, and leave the rest. Enuf said.

 

[harvestreaper]

Same,
I can only flower 25 at a time. Large plant counts just save time. I'll need to do 4 runs with 100 seeds

right and thats most people ,,,,a lot of dick measuring with numbers imo two opinions here are,, sam says oh you need 50..000 or its no use trying tom now saying we always needed 100 a go ,,so why he sell 10 packs thru the years ??lol ,,the proven truth shows people have found keepers from much lower numbers from both lines which thankfully is what you wanna see if a genepool is rich ,,,,,,, ,,,regarding toms ban i wish he went banned ,, he a great informative knowledgeable lively character ,,just my opinion but for me there nothing wrong with aggression between adult males its natural altho not appropriate around women and children ,,,,but aggression is not violence its fine people can relax a little lol ,,the image he posted i dont care about either way but you gotta be daft to think a bunch of stoners wanna see that on a thread about his plants lol ,,none of us are perfect ,,

 

[harvestreaper]

How many would I have to grow to be considered a repro so I can search again if I miss the 5% out of the first hundred?

according to sam youll need your own government research facility and according to tom ,,,another 100 lol

 

[da kine]

What Tom was doing by talking about 100 is pretty simple really. Put yer skull kap on. He himself said he is currently doing 250. He was providing a base line reasonable number that most people could, or should be able to, attempt to do, in trying to get to the elusive 5%. If the genetics are inherent, which by all appearances they are, why not go for it. Right? I don't know if Sam's quote about 50k is authentic, or not. That number seems highly unusual, and unreasonable in concept. Tom was to my best knowledge not selling anyone 10 paks direct, so he was not doing the Shanti/Nevil jingle of: "a keeper in every pack". That is what he was directly referencing, and which makes real sense. I agree completely that promoting that is doing a disservice to people that are searching out cannabis for a discriminating high. Lets face it, Indiana ditch weed will get you there, but not desirably so. You really don't need to be too daft to think this through. And, if any image is going to give you real nightmares, at your ripe age, glance at it only, and move on. The tall guy with the sickle is waiting for ya in the end, if ya want nightmares. Carry on ...