roast beef is good, mmmm, yum yum
but i WILL defend my property and belongings, with will become prime targets for looters....
!
as i stated before we are a flawed species...What's painful to read is the level of ignorance in this world and in this thread. I suppose this is the result of the '60's and peace love generation who went into teaching.
So far, I've yet to read anything of any substance from any poster regarding the claim that our current lifestyle is unsustainable, save for a few groups that already known to be agenda driven and riddled with false claims.
Are you "chicken little" folks so brainwashed and scared that you think nothing of the ability of man to adapt? In 150 years, when there actually is a shortage of fossil fuels, do you think that man will not have finally unlocked the use of hydrogen? WTF. Are all you folks employed by the government or the school district? I ask that because that's where the least educated of our society lives.
I'm still waiting for some genius here to tell me how we will sort out which half of the planet starves when this bullshit, theoretical "sustainable" model is implemented?
Man moved from the farm to the cities about 4 generations ago. They rely on me to feed them. Just because you grow pot in the backyard, don't even try to tell me that you can feed yourself. You can't.
Cars today emit about 90% harmful emissions as they did 25 years ago. But according to you lemmings, it's still a crisis.
Have you people been so McDonaldized (I want what I want and I want it now) that you don't see immense progress?
Do you not see the immense lies being spread by the alarmists crying the sky is falling when it clearly is not?
Did your parents not help you develop any critical thinking skills?
The lack of intelligence will be the downfall of the human race, not the use of fossil fuels.
Idiots all.
If natural events could wipe out the dinosaurs, what makes everyone so sure humans are impervious to extinction?
There is a better chance of that next big asteroid passing by, 1 in 250,000, destroying earth than you winning the lotto, about 1 in 140million.
^^ Very much agree. We have to stop the "we're better because we've got God's approval" mindset. We are no better than the chimpanzee...We've got greater capacity for intellect but seems like we've been using it for bad more than good.
I'm sorry, grapeman, but calling us "idiots" is not going to solve anything. And I'm sorry you don't think the "Sky is falling." No one said, at least to my knowledge, that the sky is falling. And neither should they say that. THE EARTH DOES NOT NEED OUR HELP. Should I make that statement in bold? Italics? Underlined? BIGGER? I said I don't care what the data says. The Earth will go on for the next four billion years with or without us. Life GOES ON. Something else will replace us if our species dies out. That's the nature of evolution, and that's the nature of "incumbency" in the process of evolution.
What I desire is that people should stop with the whole "I don't care" attitude. The "I don't care if I recycle these plastic bottles because it all doesn't matter." This isn't about who's getting more money and who isn't benefitting. This is reducing your impact on the Earth, regardless of the benefit to YOU.
Oh yeah, and I can't believe this type of attitude: "Man moved from the farm to the cities about 4 generations ago. They rely on me to feed them. Just because you grow pot in the backyard, don't even try to tell me that you can feed yourself. You can't."
You don't know anything about anybody here. All that you know is whether they grow pot or not.
http://assets.panda.org/downloads/living_planet_report_2008.pdf
This is the main topic of this thread, ironically, it is the least discussed.
Attack the data, not me..or at least back up all those assertions you just made with some evidence.
Yeah, anyways, where were we
Biodiversity assessment
The Global Biodiversity Assessment completed by 1500 scientists under the auspices of UNEP in 1995 updated what we know, or more correctly how little we know, about global biological diversity at the ecosystem, species and genetic levels (Heywood, 1995). The assessment was uncertain of the total number of species on Earth within an order of magnitude. Of its working figure of 13 million species, only 13% have been scientifically described. Ecological community diversity is also poorly known, as is its relationship to biological diversity, and genetic diversity has been studied for only a small number of species. The effects of human activities on biodiversity have increased so greatly that the rate of species extinctions is rising to hundreds or thousands of times the background level. These losses are driven by increasing demands on species and their habitats, and by the failure of current market systems to value biodiversity adequately. The Assessment calls for urgent action to reverse these trends (Heywood, 1996).
There has been a new recognition of the importance of protecting marine and aquatic biodiversity. The first quantitative estimates of species losses due to growing coral reef destruction predict that almost 200,000 species, or one in five presently contributing to coral reef biodiversity, could die out in the next 40 years if human pressures on reefs continue to increase (Reaka-Kudla, 1996).
Since Rio, many countries have improved their understanding of the status and importance of their biodiversity, particularly through biodiversity country studies such as those prepared under the auspices of UNEP/GEF. The United Kingdom identified 1250 species needing monitoring, of which 400 require action plans to ensure their survival (Bendall, 1996). Protective measures for biodiversity, such as legislation to protect species, can prove effective. In the USA, almost 40 percent of the plants and animals protected under the Endangered Species Act are now stable or improving as a direct result of recovery efforts (USFWS, 1994). Some African countries have joined efforts to protect threatened species through the 1994 Lusaka Agreement, and more highly migratory species are being protected by specialized cooperative agreements among range states under the Bonn Convention.
There is an emerging realization that a major part of conservation of biological diversity must take place outside of protected areas and involve local communities. The extensive agricultural areas occupied by small farmers contain much biodiversity that is important for sustainable food production. Indigenous agricultural practices have been and continue to be important elements in the maintenance of biodiversity, but these are being displaced and lost. There is a new focus on the interrelationship between agrodiversity conservation and sustainable use and development practices in smallholder agriculture, with emphasis on use of farmers' knowledge and skills as a source of information for sustainable farming (Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Implications, 1995; Uitto and Ono, 1996).
Perhaps even more important than the loss of biodiversity is the transformation of global biogeochemical cycles, the reduction in the total world biomass, and the decrease in the biological productivity of the planet (Golubev, in litt.). While quantitative measurements are not available, the eventual economic and social consequences may be so significant that the issue requires further attention.
Forest Loss
Crisis in Ocean Fisheries
Atmospheric Nitrogen Saturation
And many more..
Are you telling me that our world's forests are in worse shape today then 200 years ago?
Forest can't be that bad in America,
LOL - you quote the UN?
Are you telling me that our world's forests are in worse shape today then 200 years ago?
LOL