What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

The Trump Countdown Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
Gerrymandering effects elections on a local level. You can't gerrymandering the presidential race because each candidate gets electoral college points based off a state's popular vote.
 

Zeez

---------------->
ICMag Donor
Gerrymandering effects elections on a local level. You can't gerrymandering the presidential race because each candidate gets electoral college points based off a state's popular vote.

Actually it does effect a presidential election. It's just done on a larger scale.

Thats how trump won without the popular vote. They used Cambridge Analytica and took stolen Facebook data to find key voting districts in swing states. They also targeted impressionable gullible voters and bombarded them to throw the election.

Effectively the decision for the whole country was made by the identified weakest dummies an a handful of swing states. If that's not manipulated voting districts designed to be targeted.......

It has to be the popular vote!
 

flylowgethigh

Non-growing Lurker
ICMag Donor
Duped idiots on facebook to download an ap, and share it with their "friends". LOL, I just read about it.

Now that supposedly have 5000 data points on 250 million Americans. I wonder what goog and FB and twatter have on people?

I would love to see what they think about me, as I try to remain anom on the web, and do not use a spy phone.
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
i wish the US had ranked choice voting. I know a few states have implemented it but I wish it was federal.
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
Actually it does effect a presidential election. It's just done on a larger scale.

Thats how trump won without the popular vote. They used Cambridge Analytica and took stolen Facebook data to find key voting districts in swing states. They also targeted impressionable gullible voters and bombarded them to throw the election.

Effectively the decision for the whole country was made by the identified weakest dummies an a handful of swing states. If that's not manipulated voting districts designed to be targeted.......

It has to be the popular vote!

Trump won without the popular vote because this country goes by electoral college, it has nothing to do with gerrymandering. In order to get electoral college points you have to win the popular vote of a state period. What you described is just effective campaigning but everyone smart or dumb has the right to vote in America. I will never support going by popular vote of a nation, I believe in the system our founding fathers intended.
 

Zeez

---------------->
ICMag Donor
Trump won without the popular vote because this country goes by electoral college, it has nothing to do with gerrymandering. In order to get electoral college points you have to win the popular vote of a state period. What you described is just effective campaigning but everyone smart or dumb has the right to vote in America. I will never support going by popular vote of a nation, I believe in the system our founding fathers intended.

Boogie, It's the few controlling the many by whatever means necessary.

Just like Roe v Wade - Only 25% want that overturned.
 

eugenegreen

herbalist
Veteran
The Nobel peace prize lost any credibility to me when it was given to a guy actively engaged in war in seven countries


always bending the truth to suit your twisted narratives...

the award was given to president obama in october 2009... at which point the united states was involved in 2 conflicts;
both started by bush, a republican.

we were not at war/conflict with 7 countries at that time, we were stuck in 2 conflicts which were inherited.

people on the noble peace prize committee are not psychics...

they had no idea in 2009 what was to come in 2011

you just hate president obama


 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
The electoral college are unelected figures. They only "pledge" to the voters that they will vote for whoever the voters vote for. A pledge don't mean shit to me.

And aren't each states electoral voters based on whichever party has control over that state or control of the most districts? If so then gerrymandering 100% is relevant here.
 

Zeez

---------------->
ICMag Donor
Duped idiots on facebook to download an ap, and share it with their "friends". LOL, I just read about it.

Now that supposedly have 5000 data points on 250 million Americans. I wonder what goog and FB and twatter have on people?

I would love to see what they think about me, as I try to remain anom on the web, and do not use a spy phone.

A VPN is a good start.
I think all of us would be amazed with what they have on us.
Dam internet works against us in allot of ways.
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
The electoral college are unelected figures. They only "pledge" to the voters that they will vote for whoever the voters vote for. A pledge don't mean shit to me.

And aren't each states electoral voters based on whichever party has control over that state or control of the most districts? If so then gerrymandering 100% is relevant here.

Everyone can go to a voting booth and vote no matter what district you are in. Obama won my red state in 2008 , gerrymandering definitely effects local elections but it has no impact on a state's popular vote.
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Actually it does effect a presidential election. It's just done on a larger scale.

Thats how trump won without the popular vote. They used Cambridge Analytica and took stolen Facebook data to find key voting districts in swing states. They also targeted impressionable gullible voters and bombarded them to throw the election.

Effectively the decision for the whole country was made by the identified weakest dummies an a handful of swing states. If that's not manipulated voting districts designed to be targeted.......

It has to be the popular vote!


I already tried explaining this to Boggie. Gerrymandering effects all elections.
 
X

xavier7995

Trump won without the popular vote because this country goes by electoral college, it has nothing to do with gerrymandering. In order to get electoral college points you have to win the popular vote of a state period. What you described is just effective campaigning but everyone smart or dumb has the right to vote in America. I will never support going by popular vote of a nation, I believe in the system our founding fathers intended.

On sort of a philosophical level though, how can anyone justify a system where any one persons vote counts more than anothers, due to where they live. Its disproportionate representation. We should all have an equal say, but this weird population weighting makes that impossible. We have the technology to do it now, we aren't delivering ballots on horseback anymore. We can accurately count the popular vote and I think anyone would be hard pressed to make a legitimate argument for why we shouldnt.
 

Cuddles

Well-known member
Ah



[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]electoral college[/FONT]
you know, I never got my head round this sytem. Maybe coz I´m not american myself, or maybe because it doesn´t make any sense at all, maybe coz I´m too dense or have just never tried hard enough, or maybe coz noone has ever explained it to me properly
I have heard evencamericans say that this system is impossible to explain.


The make up of the house of commons seems rather simple by comparison. Or is it very similar?




PS I´ve been drinking :D


Why can´t live and politics be more simple? Everything is just so mirky and dirty and deceitful :)
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
On sort of a philosophical level though, how can anyone justify a system where any one persons vote counts more than anothers, due to where they live. Its disproportionate representation. We should all have an equal say, but this weird population weighting makes that impossible. We have the technology to do it now, we aren't delivering ballots on horseback anymore. We can accurately count the popular vote and I think anyone would be hard pressed to make a legitimate argument for why we shouldnt.

I believe that would lead to one party rule which would be downright scary especially considering how much many on the left in power hate anyone to the right to them. I personally believe that one of the reasons our founding fathers implemented the electoral college was to prevent one party rule for long periods of time.
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
Everyone can go to a voting booth and vote no matter what district you are in.
I was specifically referring to the Electoral College and how they are "elected" and vote.





Obama won my red state in 2008 , gerrymandering definitely effects local elections but it has no impact on a state's popular vote.
yes and the EC in 2008 Indiana pledged to vote for whoever won the popular vote. which obviously doesnt happen nationally otherwise trump would have lost.




From Indiana's wiki;


Technically the voters of Indiana cast their ballots for electors: representatives to the Electoral College. Indiana is allocated 11 electors because it has 9 congressional districts and 2 senators. All candidates who appear on the ballot or qualify to receive write-in votes must submit a list of 11 electors, who pledge to vote for their candidate and his or her running mate. Whoever wins the majority of votes in the state is awarded all 11 electoral votes. Their chosen electors then vote for president and vice president. Although electors are pledged to their candidate and running mate, they are not obligated to vote for them.[24] An elector who votes for someone other than his or her candidate is known as a faithless elector.
The electors of each state and the District of Columbia met on December 15, 2008, to cast their votes for president and vice president. The Electoral College itself never meets as one body. Instead the electors from each state and the District of Columbia met in their respective capitols.
The following were the members of the Electoral College from the state. All 11 were pledged to Barack Obama and Joe Biden:[25]

  1. Jeffrey L. Chidester
  2. Butch Morgan
  3. Michelle Boxell
  4. Charlotte Martin
  5. Jerry J. Lux
  6. Connie Southworth
  7. Alan P. Hogan
  8. Myrna E. Brown
  9. Clarence Benjamin Leatherbury
  10. Daniel J. Parker
  11. Cordelia Lewis Burks
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
I was specifically referring to the Electoral College and how they are "elected" and vote.





yes and the EC in 2008 Indiana pledged to vote for whoever won the popular vote. which obviously doesnt happen nationally otherwise trump would have lost.




From Indiana's wiki;

I will have to look into who they voted for but if I remember right Indiana went to Obama in 2008. I agree having electors is just retarded and isn't needed, once the people choose you that should be it.
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
Ah



you know, I never got my head round this sytem. Maybe coz I´m not american myself, or maybe because it doesn´t make any sense at all, maybe coz I´m too dense or have just never tried hard enough, or maybe coz noone has ever explained it to me properly
I have heard evencamericans say that this system is impossible to explain.


The make up of the house of commons seems rather simple by comparison. Or is it very similar?




PS I´ve been drinking :D


Why can´t live and politics be more simple? Everything is just so mirky and dirty and deceitful :)

We were separate states. In joining the union, the less populated states would have been overran by the heavily populated ones. All the perks would go to the populated area. The electoral college was a compromise.

Maybe not the best compromise...none of them are.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Transition-Integrity-Project-Report.pdf

spooky what the left has planned...

The Left has big plans for this election, and we could be just four weeks away from the fundamental transformation of America. They've been building a network of street activists since 2008, and the plan is to unleash them on November 3. Tonight Glenn reveals everything: how the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street weren't spontaneous uprisings, how they inspired a new era in left-wing activism, and how this newly evolved street movement has been behind nearly every major leftist movement over the past several years. But in their own words, that was just the warm-up. The real movement begins in about one month. Glenn takes you line by line, from their own documents, to show you the four scenarios Democrats have planned and also equips you with the action plan to prepare for election night and the weeks to follow.

Civil War: The Left's Election-Night War Game

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MqzRNatyOg

[youtubeif]-MqzRNatyOg[/youtubeif]
 

Switcher56

Comfortably numb!
Ah



you know, I never got my head round this sytem. Maybe coz I´m not american myself, or maybe because it doesn´t make any sense at all, maybe coz I´m too dense or have just never tried hard enough, or maybe coz noone has ever explained it to me properly
I have heard evencamericans say that this system is impossible to explain.


The make up of the house of commons seems rather simple by comparison. Or is it very similar?




PS I´ve been drinking :D


Why can´t live and politics be more simple? Everything is just so mirky and dirty and deceitful :)
Welcome to politics!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top