'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Gerrymandering effects elections on a local level. You can't gerrymandering the presidential race because each candidate gets electoral college points based off a state's popular vote.
Gerrymandering effects elections on a local level. You can't gerrymandering the presidential race because each candidate gets electoral college points based off a state's popular vote.
Actually it does effect a presidential election. It's just done on a larger scale.
Thats how trump won without the popular vote. They used Cambridge Analytica and took stolen Facebook data to find key voting districts in swing states. They also targeted impressionable gullible voters and bombarded them to throw the election.
Effectively the decision for the whole country was made by the identified weakest dummies an a handful of swing states. If that's not manipulated voting districts designed to be targeted.......
It has to be the popular vote!
Trump won without the popular vote because this country goes by electoral college, it has nothing to do with gerrymandering. In order to get electoral college points you have to win the popular vote of a state period. What you described is just effective campaigning but everyone smart or dumb has the right to vote in America. I will never support going by popular vote of a nation, I believe in the system our founding fathers intended.
The Nobel peace prize lost any credibility to me when it was given to a guy actively engaged in war in seven countries
Duped idiots on facebook to download an ap, and share it with their "friends". LOL, I just read about it.
Now that supposedly have 5000 data points on 250 million Americans. I wonder what goog and FB and twatter have on people?
I would love to see what they think about me, as I try to remain anom on the web, and do not use a spy phone.
The electoral college are unelected figures. They only "pledge" to the voters that they will vote for whoever the voters vote for. A pledge don't mean shit to me.
And aren't each states electoral voters based on whichever party has control over that state or control of the most districts? If so then gerrymandering 100% is relevant here.
Actually it does effect a presidential election. It's just done on a larger scale.
Thats how trump won without the popular vote. They used Cambridge Analytica and took stolen Facebook data to find key voting districts in swing states. They also targeted impressionable gullible voters and bombarded them to throw the election.
Effectively the decision for the whole country was made by the identified weakest dummies an a handful of swing states. If that's not manipulated voting districts designed to be targeted.......
It has to be the popular vote!
Trump won without the popular vote because this country goes by electoral college, it has nothing to do with gerrymandering. In order to get electoral college points you have to win the popular vote of a state period. What you described is just effective campaigning but everyone smart or dumb has the right to vote in America. I will never support going by popular vote of a nation, I believe in the system our founding fathers intended.
you know, I never got my head round this sytem. Maybe coz I´m not american myself, or maybe because it doesn´t make any sense at all, maybe coz I´m too dense or have just never tried hard enough, or maybe coz noone has ever explained it to me properly[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]electoral college[/FONT]
On sort of a philosophical level though, how can anyone justify a system where any one persons vote counts more than anothers, due to where they live. Its disproportionate representation. We should all have an equal say, but this weird population weighting makes that impossible. We have the technology to do it now, we aren't delivering ballots on horseback anymore. We can accurately count the popular vote and I think anyone would be hard pressed to make a legitimate argument for why we shouldnt.
I was specifically referring to the Electoral College and how they are "elected" and vote.Everyone can go to a voting booth and vote no matter what district you are in.
yes and the EC in 2008 Indiana pledged to vote for whoever won the popular vote. which obviously doesnt happen nationally otherwise trump would have lost.Obama won my red state in 2008 , gerrymandering definitely effects local elections but it has no impact on a state's popular vote.
Technically the voters of Indiana cast their ballots for electors: representatives to the Electoral College. Indiana is allocated 11 electors because it has 9 congressional districts and 2 senators. All candidates who appear on the ballot or qualify to receive write-in votes must submit a list of 11 electors, who pledge to vote for their candidate and his or her running mate. Whoever wins the majority of votes in the state is awarded all 11 electoral votes. Their chosen electors then vote for president and vice president. Although electors are pledged to their candidate and running mate, they are not obligated to vote for them.[24] An elector who votes for someone other than his or her candidate is known as a faithless elector.
The electors of each state and the District of Columbia met on December 15, 2008, to cast their votes for president and vice president. The Electoral College itself never meets as one body. Instead the electors from each state and the District of Columbia met in their respective capitols.
The following were the members of the Electoral College from the state. All 11 were pledged to Barack Obama and Joe Biden:[25]
- Jeffrey L. Chidester
- Butch Morgan
- Michelle Boxell
- Charlotte Martin
- Jerry J. Lux
- Connie Southworth
- Alan P. Hogan
- Myrna E. Brown
- Clarence Benjamin Leatherbury
- Daniel J. Parker
- Cordelia Lewis Burks
I was specifically referring to the Electoral College and how they are "elected" and vote.
yes and the EC in 2008 Indiana pledged to vote for whoever won the popular vote. which obviously doesnt happen nationally otherwise trump would have lost.
From Indiana's wiki;
Ah
you know, I never got my head round this sytem. Maybe coz I´m not american myself, or maybe because it doesn´t make any sense at all, maybe coz I´m too dense or have just never tried hard enough, or maybe coz noone has ever explained it to me properly
I have heard evencamericans say that this system is impossible to explain.
The make up of the house of commons seems rather simple by comparison. Or is it very similar?
PS I´ve been drinking
Why can´t live and politics be more simple? Everything is just so mirky and dirty and deceitful
Welcome to politics!Ah
you know, I never got my head round this sytem. Maybe coz I´m not american myself, or maybe because it doesn´t make any sense at all, maybe coz I´m too dense or have just never tried hard enough, or maybe coz noone has ever explained it to me properly
I have heard evencamericans say that this system is impossible to explain.
The make up of the house of commons seems rather simple by comparison. Or is it very similar?
PS I´ve been drinking
Why can´t live and politics be more simple? Everything is just so mirky and dirty and deceitful