Oprah for VP. Her life long partner said if she got the call for an important position in Biden's admin she will gladly serve her country
Oprah for VP. Her life long partner said if she got the call for an important position in Biden's admin she will gladly serve her country
i think i know where you are headed with this line of reasoning.
lemme guess: something something second law of thermodynamics, something something entropy, something something the complexity of life is impossible something... you don't believe in the fact of evolution and/ or the scientific theory of evolution (common descent by natural selection)?
one of my favorite topics, i've been loving biology since before i was even in preschool.
interested to know what you believe and to have a serious convo about it, maybe we should start a new thread
(btw, the laws of thermodynamics are directly tied into ndt's expertise, it's a standard in classical physics; no classical physics = no astrophysics)
i think that's a compliment
thanks a lot, if so
:friends:
i'm glad there seem to be a lotta level headed intelligent folks in this forum, even the ... frustrating ppl at least keep the conversation going.
He said trump was an idiot.
it's pretty funny/sad that people can decry science while using a computer hooked to the internet...
Are you talking about me? I'm a scientist.
You mean a scientologist.
Hempy, You got that one a little mixed up.
It's the other way around.
I just saw some blonde stumping for tRump with a blue banner running behind her, isn’t blue for democrats and red for republicans seemed off to me.
Hahaha I should clarify, though. I'm not an academically trained scientist or a proffessional scientist (currently), but I demonstratably use the scientific method and believe in it, whereas, most academically trained proffessionals actually are brain damaged by dogma and traditional baseless thinking. This is why Occams Razor is such a commonly used counter argument if you can even call it that, lol. I wouldnt be caught dead using Occam's Razor as a counter argument, unless it was to jokingly throw it in someones face who tried to use it. Scientists have really failed us since the mid 20th century. Except for the few heroes who have stood up to the psuedoscientists.
Klobuchar would have been a hard no for me. As is Harris. Warren would be acceptable. Duckworth or Gabbard would be good, with Gabbard being preferred due to her foreign policy.
Truthfully, I'm all in on the Articles of Unity project. A completely bat crap crazy idea that would probably work pretty damned well.
https://articlesofunity.org/
Very true.
Hempy, are you saying you want to disprove greenhouse gas theory?
Or do you just not accept it?
Hempy, Everybody who believes in unadulterated fact uses the scientific method in one form or another. It is basically the elimination of bullshit in a logical way and proving a hypothesis. If that works for you why are you a trumper?
I routinely disprove it and have not yet received even an attemp at a counter-argument. And that is because every bit of informatiin that goes into disproving it, is known laws of well understood thermodynamic principles. So, people always resort to personal attack, citing their degree as authority (case closed), or scratching their heads. They generally can't fathom that CO2 greenhouse gas theory is flawed and is being inflicted upon us for political reasons. Once a person does see. It becomes quite clear, but it is very hard for people to accept that we've been intentionally lied to on such a large scale and that many scientists aren't lying intentionally, but have simply failed scientifically and can't imagine that the peer review process can go wrong or fail altogether, or even be fabricated. They can't imagine that this is done hand in hand intentionally with media and social media and institutions in an organized conspiracy throughout the world. Scientists are often just obedient dummies who did what they were told their whole lives without much curiousity. Just like mainstream journalists.