socioecologist
Member
CBD products will be in stores with a lot more regularity after the short legislative session finishes up; there was a rule in place prohibiting OLCC shops from selling industrial hemp, hemp extracts, and marijuana + hemp extracts. We may still end up with an outlandish requirement, imposed by Sen. Ginny Burdick, that all products containing hemp be labeled as such and kept separate from marijuana products (WTF?), but they'll be in stores soon either way.
Oregon is still home to some of the most stringent testing requirements, particularly for pesticides, in the world. That is threatened though. My fear is that the inflation game with THC % at labs is in full effect, same as happened in WA, CA, CO, etc., and will have a predictable race-to-the-bottom-in-quality outcome. Retail stores are shunning any product that doesn't test high (20%+), and, miraculously, all the labs are now certifying flowers with ever-increasing content. Remember when a lab test for 18% total cannabinoid content meant something??? I just saw a post on IG with someone claiming a 32% THC Oregon lab test on Blue Dream. Blue Dream. This is how transparency and accountability dies.
One of our targeted breeding projects right now is to create a CBGV-rich variety derived from our library of pure CBG lines. I spent the week grilling every lab in the state on their LOQs, equipment used, reference standard availability, etc. and it turns out only two labs can even screen for propyls ("V" cannabinoids) and neither of them have standards for CBGV or CBGVa. Pixis and Green Leaf can, however, screen for THCV and THCVa, with Pixis having a two times lower LOQ for the compounds. The LOQs over at Pixis are world-class and what you should expect to see in an actual lab.
Guess which lab growers stay away from in Oregon because of consistently "low" cannabinoid content results? Yup, the most accurate one around. I get it. No shop (or consumer) will buy an accurately tested 12% flower if there's a shoddily tested 32% alternative. The penalty we all pay for this, in the long run, is a playing field dominated by impropriety and inaccuracy. Not exactly the sterling example of science and public health I was hoping Oregon would set...
Oregon is still home to some of the most stringent testing requirements, particularly for pesticides, in the world. That is threatened though. My fear is that the inflation game with THC % at labs is in full effect, same as happened in WA, CA, CO, etc., and will have a predictable race-to-the-bottom-in-quality outcome. Retail stores are shunning any product that doesn't test high (20%+), and, miraculously, all the labs are now certifying flowers with ever-increasing content. Remember when a lab test for 18% total cannabinoid content meant something??? I just saw a post on IG with someone claiming a 32% THC Oregon lab test on Blue Dream. Blue Dream. This is how transparency and accountability dies.
One of our targeted breeding projects right now is to create a CBGV-rich variety derived from our library of pure CBG lines. I spent the week grilling every lab in the state on their LOQs, equipment used, reference standard availability, etc. and it turns out only two labs can even screen for propyls ("V" cannabinoids) and neither of them have standards for CBGV or CBGVa. Pixis and Green Leaf can, however, screen for THCV and THCVa, with Pixis having a two times lower LOQ for the compounds. The LOQs over at Pixis are world-class and what you should expect to see in an actual lab.
Guess which lab growers stay away from in Oregon because of consistently "low" cannabinoid content results? Yup, the most accurate one around. I get it. No shop (or consumer) will buy an accurately tested 12% flower if there's a shoddily tested 32% alternative. The penalty we all pay for this, in the long run, is a playing field dominated by impropriety and inaccuracy. Not exactly the sterling example of science and public health I was hoping Oregon would set...