What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

The Oregon Weed Thread -Grows, News and Laws and Whatever

PDX Dopesmoker

Active member
My boy will be heading up your way with a cut of his orange funk! Wonder if they will outlaw it!

Use sophisticated adult names, children like primary colors and funky music.
"Citrus Sinensis Odor" might be a better choice.
I guess you can use any alcohol brand name by default, that would probably be the safest way to go, they're the Oregon Liquor Control Commission not the Oregon Mind Control Commission. Any OG in the background? Curaçao Kush has a nice ring to it.
Gorilla Glue is allowed so far, so I guess adhesives are safe names too, but you don't have to be over 21 to buy them so that might be a grey area.
Don't forget that your GSC is just as dank even if the jar says "League of Women Voters" and has a photo of the Golden Girls on it instead of a horny 18 year old stuffed into a 13 year old's scout uniform.
 
R

Robrites

This ol' boy brought his girlfriends to the trim party Saturday.

This ol' boy brought his girlfriends to the trim party Saturday.

picture.php
 

Dankwolf

Active member
Cheesquake full term , make shift green House .11/6/16 finish time

Cheesquake full term , make shift green House .11/6/16 finish time



I dont even want to look at another pair of scissors.
 
R

Robrites

Oregon marijuana measures

Oregon marijuana measures

Baker County
Measure 1-77
Halfway marijuana sales tax
Updated: 10:50 pm, Nov 8
Yes
152 89.4%
No
18 10.6%
Measure 1-76
Halfway medical and recreational marijuana sales and biz ban
Updated: 10:50 pm, Nov 8
Yes
93 52.8%
No
83 47.2%
Measure 1-75
Huntington marijuana sales tax
Updated: 8:41 pm, Nov 8
Yes
132 88.6%
No
17 11.4%
Measure 1-78
Sumpter marijuana sales tax
Updated: 9:09 pm, Nov 8
Yes
105 84.7%
No
19 15.3%
Benton County
Measure 2-96
Corvallis marijuana tax
Updated: 8:49 pm, Nov 8
Yes
18,084 74.6%
No
6,171 25.4%
Measure 2-94
Philomath marijuana tax
Updated: 8:48 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,621 75.5%
No
527 24.5%
Clackamas County
Measure 3-484
Canby marijuana tax
Updated: 10:22 pm, Nov 8
Yes
5,009 80.9%
No
1,185 19.1%
Measure 3-510
Clackamas County marijuana tax
Updated: 10:24 pm, Nov 8
Yes
116,229 76.5%
No
35,766 23.5%
75.4% of est. votes counted
Measure 3-481
Gladstone marijuana retail sales and medical dispensary ban
Updated: 10:23 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,026 50.0%
No
2,024 50.0%
Measure 3-492
Gladstone marijuana tax
Updated: 10:23 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,006 74.8%
No
1,011 25.2%
Measure 3-496
Happy Valley marijuana tax
Updated: 10:24 pm, Nov 8
Yes
5,642 82.0%
No
1,238 18.0%
Measure 3-490
Lake Oswego recreational marijuana sales ban
Updated: 11:35 pm, Nov 8
Yes
11,331 60.3%
No
7,470 39.7%
Measure 3-483
Lift Canby marijuana business ban
Updated: 10:17 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,491 39.8%
No
3,764 60.2%
Measure 3-495
Milwaukie marijuana tax
Updated: 10:25 pm, Nov 8
Yes
5,185 68.9%
No
2,344 31.1%
Measure 3-488
Molalla marijuana tax
Updated: 10:26 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,884 73.6%
No
675 26.4%
Measure 3-508
Oregon City marijuana business ban
Updated: 10:27 pm, Nov 8
Yes
5,519 46.0%
No
6,478 54.0%
Measure 3-507
Oregon City marijuana tax
Updated: 10:27 pm, Nov 8
Yes
9,119 76.0%
No
2,886 24.0%
Measure 3-499
Sandy marijuana business ban
Updated: 10:29 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,880 56.1%
No
1,471 43.9%
Measure 3-500
Sandy marijuana tax
Updated: 10:30 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,661 79.5%
No
687 20.5%
Measure 3-513
West Linn marijuana business ban
Updated: 10:31 pm, Nov 8
Yes
6,975 61.2%
No
4,413 38.8%
Measure 3-486
Wilsonville marijuana business ban
Updated: 10:32 pm, Nov 8
Yes
10,320 65.1%
No
5,534 34.9%
Clatsop County
Measure 4-180
Astoria marijuana tax
Updated: 10:36 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,372 73.5%
No
1,218 26.5%
Measure 4-179
Cannon Beach marijuana sales ban
Updated: 10:36 pm, Nov 8
Yes
380 49.1%
No
394 50.9%
Measure 4-182
Cannon Beach marijuana tax
Updated: 10:36 pm, Nov 8
Yes
571 75.7%
No
183 24.3%
Measure 4-184
Seaside marijuana tax
Updated: 10:37 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,796 73.5%
No
648 26.5%
Columbia County
Measure 5-258
Columbia County marijuana tax
Updated: 8:36 pm, Nov 8
Yes
7,851 71.0%
No
3,208 29.0%
47.1% of est. votes counted
Measure 5-264
Rainier marijuana tax
Updated: 8:38 pm, Nov 8
Yes
359 72.4%
No
137 27.6%
Measure 5-262
Scappoose marijuana sales ban
Updated: 8:38 pm, Nov 8
Yes
719 37.7%
No
1,190 62.3%
Measure 5-261
Scappoose marijuana tax
Updated: 8:37 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,435 74.0%
No
505 26.0%
Measure 5-260
St. Helens marijuana sales tax
Updated: 8:37 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,436 66.2%
No
1,241 33.8%
Coos County
Measure 6-158
Coos Bay marijuana tax
Updated: 8:56 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,263 68.5%
No
1,499 31.5%
Measure 6-154
Coos County marijuana tax
Updated: 8:32 pm, Nov 8
Yes
15,643 70.3%
No
6,612 29.7%
72.0% of est. votes counted
Measure 6-157
End Coos Bay marijuana sales ban
Updated: 8:56 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,773 58.1%
No
1,998 41.9%
Measure 6-155
Myrtle Point sales ban
Updated: 8:56 pm, Nov 8
Yes
439 52.6%
No
396 47.4%
Measure 6-159
North Bend marijuana tax
Updated: 8:56 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,301 72.0%
No
897 28.0%
Curry County
Measure 8-86
Brookings marijuana tax
Updated: 8:39 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,861 78.5%
No
510 21.5%
Measure 8-88
Curry County marijuana tax
Updated: 8:40 pm, Nov 8
Yes
7,095 73.9%
No
2,510 26.1%
Measure 8-87
Gold Beach marijuana tax
Updated: 8:39 pm, Nov 8
Yes
554 74.7%
No
188 25.3%
Deschutes County
Measure 9-110
Bend marijuana tax
Updated: 8:25 pm, Nov 8
Yes
19,612 79.2%
No
5,158 20.8%
Measure 9-111
La Pine marijuana sale ban
Updated: 10:59 pm, Nov 8
Yes
212 39.7%
No
322 60.3%
Measure 9-112
La Pine marijuana tax
Updated: 10:59 pm, Nov 8
Yes
383 72.3%
No
147 27.7%
Douglas County
Measure 10-148
Canyonville dispensary ban (Yes allows marijuana; no institutes ban)
Updated: 11:38 pm, Nov 8
Yes
254 43.2%
No
334 56.8%
Measure 10-149
Canyonville sales ban (Yes allows marijuana; no institutes ban)
Updated: 11:39 pm, Nov 8
Yes
209 36.5%
No
364 63.5%
Measure 10-144
Douglas County dispensary ban (Yes allows marijuana; no institutes ban)
Updated: 11:38 pm, Nov 8
Yes
22,787 47.2%
No
25,502 52.8%
88.5% of est. votes counted
Measure 10-143
Douglas County sales ban (Yes allows marijuana; no institutes ban)
Updated: 11:37 pm, Nov 8
Yes
21,518 44.4%
No
26,960 55.6%
88.8% of est. votes counted
Measure 10-151
Drain marijuana sales tax
Updated: 8:30 pm, Nov 8
Yes
230 79.6%
No
59 20.4%
Measure 10-147
Myrtle Creek marijuana sales tax
Updated: 8:29 pm, Nov 8
Yes
943 76.2%
No
295 23.8%
Measure 10-146
Roseburg marijuana sales tax
Updated: 11:38 pm, Nov 8
Yes
7,069 76.2%
No
2,209 23.8%
Measure 10-153
Sutherlin recreational and medical marijuana sales and business ban (Yes allows marijuana; no institutes ban)
Updated: 11:39 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,773 46.2%
No
2,062 53.8%
Gilliam County
Measure 11-24
Condon marijuana sales tax
Updated: 9:45 pm, Nov 8
Yes
326 83.8%
No
63 16.2%
Measure 11-22
Gilliam County ban on recreational and medical marijuana sales/dipensaries/processing
Updated: 9:45 pm, Nov 8
Yes
419 43.5%
No
544 56.5%
Measure 11-23
Gilliam County marijuana tax
Updated: 9:45 pm, Nov 8
Yes
811 85.4%
No
139 14.6%
Grant County
Measure 12-64
Long Creek marijuana retail sales and medical dispensary ban
Updated: 8:45 pm, Nov 8
Yes
79 76.0%
No
25 24.0%
Harney County
Measure 13-13
Hines marijuana tax
Updated: 8:37 pm, Nov 8
Yes
657 83.1%
No
134 16.9%
Hood River County
Measure 14-59
Hood River (city) marijuana tax
Updated: 8:39 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,256 73.8%
No
801 26.2%
Jackson County
Measure 15-149
Ashland marijuana tax
Updated: 8:09 pm, Nov 8
Yes
8,466 76.9%
No
2,541 23.1%
Measure 15-147
Central Point ban on marijuana dispensaries
Updated: 8:08 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,374 57.4%
No
3,241 42.6%
Measure 15-146
Central Point marijuana sales ban
Updated: 8:08 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,787 63.0%
No
2,810 37.0%
Measure 15-148
Central Point marijuana tax
Updated: 8:09 pm, Nov 8
Yes
6,123 80.7%
No
1,469 19.3%
Measure 15-150
Eagle Point marijuana sales ban
Updated: 9:56 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,317 58.8%
No
1,624 41.2%
Measure 15-151
Eagle Point marijuana tax
Updated: 9:56 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,099 79.2%
No
812 20.8%
Measure 15-165
Gold Hill marijuana tax
Updated: 8:11 pm, Nov 8
Yes
292 66.7%
No
146 33.3%
Measure 15-162
Jackson County marijuana tax
Updated: 9:57 pm, Nov 8
Yes
72,002 75.5%
No
23,416 24.5%
92.5% of est. votes counted
Measure 15-143
Jacksonville ban on medical marijuana dispensaries
Updated: 11:09 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,331 69.9%
No
573 30.1%
Measure 15-142
Jacksonville marijuana sales ban
Updated: 11:09 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,392 73.2%
No
510 26.8%
Measure 15-166
Medford ban on growing legal marijuana outdoors
Updated: 11:13 pm, Nov 8
Yes
21,893 67.8%
No
10,403 32.2%
Measure 15-144
Medford marijuana sales ban
Updated: 9:55 pm, Nov 8
Yes
15,791 48.9%
No
16,517 51.1%
Measure 15-145
Medford marijuana tax
Updated: 9:55 pm, Nov 8
Yes
24,614 76.3%
No
7,642 23.7%
Measure 15-153
Phoenix marijuana tax
Updated: 8:09 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,576 75.2%
No
521 24.8%
Measure 15-155
Rogue River marijuana tax
Updated: 8:09 pm, Nov 8
Yes
713 74.3%
No
247 25.7%
Measure 15-157
Shady Cove marijuana sales ban
Updated: 8:10 pm, Nov 8
Yes
720 51.0%
No
693 49.0%
Measure 15-158
Shady Cove marijuana tax
Updated: 8:10 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,022 72.2%
No
394 27.8%
Measure 15-159
Talent marijuana tax
Updated: 9:56 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,091 74.5%
No
717 25.5%
Jefferson County
Measure 16-84
Ban on recreational marijuana processing in Jefferson County
Updated: 10:50 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,160 53.9%
No
3,558 46.1%
Measure 16-83
Ban on recreational marijuana wholesalers in Jefferson County
Updated: 10:50 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,189 54.3%
No
3,528 45.7%
Measure 16-81
Jefferson County ban on growing recreational marijuana
Updated: 10:49 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,088 52.7%
No
3,663 47.3%
Measure 16-82
Jefferson County ban on marijuana retail sales
Updated: 10:49 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,214 54.5%
No
3,524 45.5%
Measure 16-80
Jefferson County ban on medical marijuana dispensaries
Updated: 10:49 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,842 49.7%
No
3,886 50.3%
Measure 16-79
Jefferson County ban on medical marijuana processing
Updated: 10:49 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,780 49.1%
No
3,923 50.9%
Measure 16-77
Madras marijuana sales ban
Updated: 10:48 pm, Nov 8
Yes
746 46.0%
No
876 54.0%
Measure 16-78
Madras marijuana tax
Updated: 8:48 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,134 78.2%
No
317 21.8%
Josephine County
Measure 17.73
Grants Pass sales ban
Updated: 10:32 pm, Nov 8
Yes
7,542 50.1%
No
7,523 49.9%
Measure 17.75
Josephine County marijuana tax
Updated: 10:32 pm, Nov 8
Yes
31,099 78.7%
No
8,428 21.3%
86.2% of est. votes counted
Lake County
Measure 19-31
Lake County recreational and medical marijuana sales and business ban (Yes allows marijuana; no institutes ban)
Updated: 8:37 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,274 37.1%
No
2,161 62.9%
Lane County
Measure 20-248
Coburg marijuana sale ban
Updated: 11:04 pm, Nov 8
Yes
367 61.3%
No
232 38.7%
Measure 20-245
Cottage Grove marijuana tax
Updated: 8:01 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,540 69.5%
No
1,114 30.5%
Measure 20-238
Creswell marijuana sale ban
Updated: 11:02 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,157 52.5%
No
1,047 47.5%
Measure 20-255
Creswell marijuana sales tax
Updated: 11:07 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,699 77.5%
No
493 22.5%
Measure 20-249
Dunes City marijuana tax
Updated: 11:04 pm, Nov 8
Yes
593 67.2%
No
290 32.8%
Measure 20-253
Eugene marijuana tax
Updated: 11:05 pm, Nov 8
Yes
54,784 71.9%
No
21,461 28.1%
Measure 20-251
Florence marijuana tax
Updated: 11:04 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,404 73.1%
No
1,251 26.9%
Measure 20-256
Junction City marijuana sales bax
Updated: 11:06 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,409 53.8%
No
1,210 46.2%
Measure 20-261
Lane County marijuana tax
Updated: 11:08 pm, Nov 8
Yes
119,231 71.0%
No
48,683 29.0%
91.9% of est. votes counted
Measure 20-265
Oakridge marijuana tax
Updated: 11:07 pm, Nov 8
Yes
805 67.6%
No
386 32.4%
Measure 20-254
Springfield marijuana tax
Updated: 11:06 pm, Nov 8
Yes
15,203 66.8%
No
7,564 33.2%
Measure 20-246
Veneta marijuana tax
Updated: 11:03 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,343 64.7%
No
732 35.3%
Measure 20-247
Westfir marijuana tax
Updated: 11:03 pm, Nov 8
Yes
84 72.4%
No
32 27.6%
Lincoln County
Measure 21-173
Depoe Bay marijuana tax
Updated: 8:40 pm, Nov 8
Yes
663 75.6%
No
214 24.4%
Measure 21-174
Lincoln City marijuana tax
Updated: 8:41 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,510 66.0%
No
1,291 34.0%
Measure 21-172
Lincoln County marijuana tax
Updated: 8:40 pm, Nov 8
Yes
15,334 68.4%
No
7,076 31.6%
86.5% of est. votes counted
Measure 21-169
Newport marijuana tax
Updated: 9:00 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,194 69.7%
No
1,387 30.3%
Measure 21-170
Waldport marijuana tax
Updated: 8:40 pm, Nov 8
Yes
842 70.5%
No
352 29.5%
Measure 21-171
Yachats marijuana tax
Updated: 8:40 pm, Nov 8
Yes
399 78.1%
No
112 21.9%
Linn County
Measure 22-157
Albany marijuana tax
Updated: 11:44 pm, Nov 8
Yes
27,088 75.9%
No
8,587 24.1%
Measure 22-156
Albany sales ban
Updated: 11:43 pm, Nov 8
Yes
13,147 36.8%
No
22,598 63.2%
Measure 22-150
Brownsville marijuana tax
Updated: 11:44 pm, Nov 8
Yes
610 79.0%
No
162 21.0%
Measure 22-149
Brownsville sales ban
Updated: 11:44 pm, Nov 8
Yes
391 49.7%
No
395 50.3%
Measure 22-151
Halsey all marijuana ban
Updated: 8:26 pm, Nov 8
Yes
186 53.0%
No
165 47.0%
Measure 22-152
Halsey marijuana sales tax
Updated: 8:26 pm, Nov 8
Yes
290 83.1%
No
59 16.9%
Measure 22-163
Harrisburg marijuana tax
Updated: 11:47 pm, Nov 8
Yes
969 80.2%
No
239 19.8%
Measure 22-164
Harrisburg sales ban
Updated: 11:46 pm, Nov 8
Yes
670 55.1%
No
545 44.9%
Measure 22-148
Lebanon marijuana tax
Updated: 8:23 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,692 79.2%
No
1,229 20.8%
Measure 22-147
Lebanon sales ban
Updated: 8:21 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,470 41.5%
No
3,488 58.5%
Measure 22-146
Linn County marijuana sales ban
Updated: 8:05 pm, Nov 8
Yes
23,246 47.2%
No
26,044 52.8%
83.1% of est. votes counted
Measure 22-155
Lyons sales ban
Updated: 8:27 pm, Nov 8
Yes
244 54.8%
No
201 45.2%
Measure 22-144
Mill City marijuana tax
Updated: 8:53 pm, Nov 8
Yes
46 76.7%
No
14 23.3%
Measure 22-143
Mill City sales ban
Updated: 8:27 pm, Nov 8
Yes
252 52.2%
No
231 47.8%
Measure 22-145
Millersburg sales ban
Updated: 8:53 pm, Nov 8
Yes
569 57.5%
No
421 42.5%
Measure 22-158
Sweet Home ban on medical marijuana dispensaries
Updated: 8:54 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,373 43.0%
No
1,822 57.0%
Measure 22-160
Sweet Home marijuana tax
Updated: 8:28 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,436 76.2%
No
761 23.8%
Measure 22-159
Sweet Home sales ban
Updated: 8:54 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,460 45.8%
No
1,727 54.2%
Measure 22-154
Tangent marijuana tax
Updated: 8:29 pm, Nov 8
Yes
413 80.7%
No
99 19.3%
Measure 22-153
Tangent sales ban
Updated: 8:29 pm, Nov 8
Yes
239 46.7%
No
273 53.3%
Marion County
Measure 24-402
Aumsville marijuana sales ban
Updated: 11:31 pm, Nov 8
Yes
625 51.6%
No
586 48.4%
Measure 24-413
Detroit
Updated: 11:23 pm, Nov 8
Yes
89 78.8%
No
24 21.2%
Measure 24-418
Donald marijuana tax
Updated: 11:24 pm, Nov 8
Yes
246 75.0%
No
82 25.0%
Measure 24-415
Gates marijuana tax
Updated: 11:23 pm, Nov 8
Yes
114 69.9%
No
49 30.1%
Measure 24-401
Gervais marijuana sales ban
Updated: 11:16 pm, Nov 8
Yes
120 35.2%
No
221 64.8%
Measure 24-398
Hubbard marijuana sales ban
Updated: 11:15 pm, Nov 8
Yes
279 48.9%
No
291 51.1%
Measure 24-407
Hubbard marijuana tax
Updated: 11:20 pm, Nov 8
Yes
456 79.4%
No
118 20.6%
Measure 24-408
Jefferson marijuana tax
Updated: 11:21 pm, Nov 8
Yes
551 72.0%
No
214 28.0%
Measure 24-397
Keizer marijuana tax
Updated: 11:15 pm, Nov 8
Yes
9,471 80.2%
No
2,332 19.8%
Measure 24-405
Marion County allow marijuana recreational sales & related businesses? (Yes allows marijuana; no institutes ban)
Updated: 11:19 pm, Nov 8
Yes
42,677 46.3%
No
49,554 53.7%
70.3% of est. votes counted
Measure 24-404
Marion County allow medical marijuana dispensaries? (Yes allows dispensaries; no institutes ban)
Updated: 11:18 pm, Nov 8
Yes
45,052 48.8%
No
47,209 51.2%
70.3% of est. votes counted
Measure 24-406
Marion County marijuana tax
Updated: 11:20 pm, Nov 8
Yes
71,549 77.1%
No
21,257 22.9%
70.8% of est. votes counted
Measure 24-409
Mt. Angel ban on marijuana sales and medical dispensaries
Updated: 11:21 pm, Nov 8
Yes
475 56.5%
No
365 43.5%
Measure 24-412
Mt. Angel marijuana tax
Updated: 11:23 pm, Nov 8
Yes
665 79.6%
No
170 20.4%
Measure 24-400
Salem marijuana tax
Updated: 11:16 pm, Nov 8
Yes
52,196 74.8%
No
17,619 25.2%
Measure 24-411
Scotts Mills ban on marijuana sales and medical dispensaries
Updated: 11:22 pm, Nov 8
Yes
77 64.7%
No
42 35.3%
Measure 24-416
Scotts Mills marijuana tax
Updated: 11:24 pm, Nov 8
Yes
152 79.6%
No
39 20.4%
Measure 24-396
Silverton marijuana tax
Updated: 11:14 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,943 81.4%
No
674 18.6%
Measure 24-395
Stayton marijuana tax
Updated: 11:14 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,796 77.5%
No
521 22.5%
Measure 24-410
Sublimity ban on marijuana sales and medical dispensaries
Updated: 11:21 pm, Nov 8
Yes
490 57.1%
No
368 42.9%
Measure 24-403
Turner marijuana sales ban
Updated: 11:17 pm, Nov 8
Yes
368 50.0%
No
368 50.0%
Multnomah County
Measure 26-176
Fairview marijuana ban
Updated: 11:33 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,551 52.5%
No
1,405 47.5%
Measure 26-186
Gresham marijuana tax
Updated: 11:34 pm, Nov 8
Yes
23,996 75.6%
No
7,754 24.4%
Measure 26-180
Portland marijuana tax
Updated: 11:30 pm, Nov 8
Yes
400,319 80.6%
No
96,287 19.4%
Measure 26-177
Wood Village marijuana tax
Updated: 11:36 pm, Nov 8
Yes
570 69.4%
No
251 30.6%
Polk County
Measure 27-121
Independence marijuana tax
Updated: 8:42 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,842 69.5%
No
808 30.5%
Measure 27-123
Monmouth marijuana tax
Updated: 8:42 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,320 77.1%
No
690 22.9%
Tillamook County
Measure 29-138
Manzanita all-marijuana ban
Updated: 8:42 pm, Nov 8
Yes
131 32.8%
No
269 67.3%
Measure 29-137
Nehalem marijuana tax
Updated: 8:41 pm, Nov 8
Yes
108 75.5%
No
35 24.5%
Measure 29-139
Rockaway Beach marijuana tax
Updated: 8:42 pm, Nov 8
Yes
449 69.1%
No
201 30.9%
Measure 29-143
Tillamook County marijuana tax
Updated: 8:43 pm, Nov 8
Yes
7,615 72.1%
No
2,953 27.9%
78.1% of est. votes counted
Measure 29-140
Tillamook marijuana tax
Updated: 8:42 pm, Nov 8
Yes
899 70.3%
No
380 29.7%
Measure 29-142
Wheeler marijuana tax
Updated: 8:43 pm, Nov 8
Yes
124 66.0%
No
64 34.0%
Umatilla County
Measure 30-119
Hermiston marijuana sales ban
Updated: 8:35 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,227 55.4%
No
1,796 44.6%
Measure 30-058
Milton-Freewater ban on medical and recreation marijuana sales
Updated: 8:34 pm, Nov 8
Yes
634 53.5%
No
550 46.5%
Measure 30-059
Milton-Freewater marijuana tax
Updated: 8:34 pm, Nov 8
Yes
949 81.0%
No
223 19.0%
Measure 30-118
Pendleton marijuana tax
Updated: 8:35 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,049 83.5%
No
801 16.5%
Measure 30-117
Pendleton medical marijuana dispensary ban
Updated: 8:35 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,941 60.4%
No
1,929 39.6%
Measure 30-116
Pendleton recreational marijuana sales ban
Updated: 8:35 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,710 55.6%
No
2,167 44.4%
Union County
Measure 31-91
City of Union marijuana sales ban
Updated: 9:47 pm, Nov 8
Yes
424 58.4%
No
302 41.6%
Measure 31-92
North Powder ban
Updated: 9:47 pm, Nov 8
Yes
56 41.5%
No
79 58.5%
Measure 31-93
North Powder sales tax
Updated: 9:48 pm, Nov 8
Yes
95 72.5%
No
36 27.5%
Wasco County
Measure 33-86
Maupin dispensary ban
Updated: 8:43 pm, Nov 8
Yes
92 54.1%
No
78 45.9%
Measure 33-87
Maupin sales ban
Updated: 8:43 pm, Nov 8
Yes
105 61.8%
No
65 38.2%
Measure 33-91
Mosier sales tax
Updated: 8:44 pm, Nov 8
Yes
130 80.2%
No
32 19.8%
Measure 33-90
Shaniko ban on all marijuana
Updated: 8:44 pm, Nov 8
Yes
9 75.0%
No
3 25.0%
Measure 33-89
The Dalles tax
Updated: 8:43 pm, Nov 8
Yes
3,732 76.1%
No
1,170 23.9%
Washington County
Measure 34-251
Beaverton recreational marijuana tax
Updated: 10:58 pm, Nov 8
Yes
25,088 75.0%
No
8,359 25.0%
Measure 34-266
Cornelius recreational marijuana tax
Updated: 9:13 pm, Nov 8
Yes
2,013 71.0%
No
823 29.0%
Measure 34-249
Forest Grove recreational marijuana tax
Updated: 9:14 pm, Nov 8
Yes
5,768 77.0%
No
1,727 23.0%
Measure 34-265
Gaston blanket marijuana business ban
Updated: 9:14 pm, Nov 8
Yes
113 50.9%
No
109 49.1%
Measure 34-252
Hillsboro recreational marijuana tax
Updated: 10:59 pm, Nov 8
Yes
24,175 76.8%
No
7,289 23.2%
Measure 34-270
King City marijuana tax
Updated: 10:59 pm, Nov 8
Yes
1,755 78.5%
No
480 21.5%
Measure 34-264
Sherwood marijuana business ban
Updated: 11:00 pm, Nov 8
Yes
4,302 56.3%
No
3,334 43.7%
Measure 34-263
Sherwood recreational marijuana tax
Updated: 11:00 pm, Nov 8
Yes
6,223 82.3%
No
1,337 17.7%
Measure 34-257
Tigard recreational marijuana tax
Updated: 11:01 pm, Nov 8
Yes
15,756 75.7%
No
5,064 24.3%
Measure 34-253
Tualatin recreational marijuana tax
Updated: 11:01 pm, Nov 8
Yes
7,941 77.2%
No
2,345 22.8%
Yamhill County
Measure 36-184
Dundee marijuana tax
Updated: 8:32 pm, Nov 8
Yes
657 73.2%
No
240 26.8%
Measure 36-182
Lafayette marijuana tax
Updated: 8:30 pm, Nov 8
Yes
706 74.0%
No
248 26.0%
Measure 36-181
McMinnville marijuana tax
Updated: 8:30 pm, Nov 8
Yes
7,226 76.4%
No
2,228 23.6%
Measure 36-183
Sheridan marijuana tax
Updated: 8:30 pm, Nov 8
Yes
816 77.4%
No
238 22.6%
Measure 36-185
Willamina marijuana tax
Updated: 8:41 pm, Nov 8
Yes
366 71.8%
No
144 28.2%

oregonlive.com logo
About Us
 

Sluicebox

Member
How do you collect taxes on something you don't allow to be sold or produced? Everyone voted for the taxes but no one wants the businesses. Utter bull shit! Legal is legal, Oregon voted for it years ago. Those who didn't like it should have tried a small hit. Whomever came up with the ban options for the counties should be flogged with moldy weed. I propose that if you voted for the tax then the businesses should be allowed. You can't have it both ways.
 

Abja Roots

ABF(Always Be Flowering) - Founder
Veteran
Great information as always Robrites. I'd been keeping an eye out on Marion, but unfortunately it did not pass there. Lots of people are sitting on land that they overpaid for in that county.

@Sluicbeox - They're saying that if something were to change they would tax it. Something may change later, and if it does they've already voted to tax it.
 

PDX Dopesmoker

Active member
Great information as always Robrites. I'd been keeping an eye out on Marion, but unfortunately it did not pass there. Lots of people are sitting on land that they overpaid for in that county.

@Sluicbeox - They're saying that if something were to change they would tax it. Something may change later, and if it does they've already voted to tax it.

Under state law those local tax laws become invalid in municipalities which ban some or all of the industry.
 
R

Robrites

Search-and-destroy missions for illegal pot falter in Oregon

Search-and-destroy missions for illegal pot falter in Oregon

Oregon is poised to become the first in a group of key battleground marijuana states to exit a nationwide program designed to discover and destroy black-market pot plantations.

The move follows Oregon's first year of recreational marijuana sales and a thriving industry with legal marijuana farms stretching from the coast to the Idaho border.

Money for the eradication effort in Oregon has dropped by nearly three-quarters in the last year to $200,000, by far the largest percentage cut in the country, financial data from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration shows.

That's on top of steady cuts over the past three fiscal years that add up to an overall 80 percent decline.

To the north, another well-established hot spot for illegal pot grows is taking a different approach. Washington has generally kept its Drug Enforcement Administration money intact since legalizing recreational marijuana. It's dropped only about 30 percent over three years, down to $760,000 this year.

But with no one strongly advocating for it, the program in Oregon appears headed for the chopping block.

"If you look at a graph and see how steeply the budget trends down, I'd imagine it's very possible we won't get funding for this next year," said State Police Capt. Bill Fugate, whose agency ran the program until 2015.

Police and sheriff's offices typically use the money on equipment, training and helicopters based on allocations largely established through state requests.

State police passed oversight of the program – making the funding requests and doling out money to local agencies – to the Oregon State Sheriffs' Association this year.

That association sees it as an unwanted burden.

"They must've caught me at a weak moment when they asked us to take it over," said retired Curry County Sheriff John Bishop, executive director of the nonprofit group that provides administrative help to sheriffs. "We're not even going to run it next year. ... I don't know who will yet. No one's figured that out."

Discussions begin in January over who will take it on, he said. He wouldn't speculate on who's in the mix.

It's possible the state could step in with money, but there's no question that the focus has shifted.

"The problem is the way the program utilizes funds from DEA, it doesn't have a good match with our regulatory scheme," said Jeffrey Rhoades, senior adviser on marijuana policy to Gov. Kate Brown and a longtime prosecutor.

"That's not to say we've beaten the black market," Rhoades said. "The main point is, in this new legal market, we need to adjust our thinking in how we conduct these kind of operations."

***

Oregon entered an exclusive club a decade ago: part of the Drug Enforcement Administration's "M7" – seven states identified as primary marijuana cultivators. The others were California, Washington, Hawaii, Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia. The federal government has spent roughly $18 million annually – mostly in the M7 states -- to focus on eradication.

And it appeared to return dividends – Oregon authorities pulled up or burned an average of 100,000 plants a year when the money started coming in.

But in 2012, discoveries plummeted to 33,000 plants a year, and that level has held steady since then. Washington experienced a similar nose-dive.

Neither state remains in the M7.

The Northwest states are now closer to Colorado, where major marijuana grows historically haven't been as common and which stopped receiving federal marijuana eradication funds in 2015.

Using state money, Colorado found about 27,000 plants last year, not far from its annual average over the past five years.

Fugate imagines this will play out in Oregon as well.

"Let's say DEA money goes away completely," he said. "We're not going to get out of the business. There are four stages to this game: detection, investigation, eradication, and apprehension (of growers). Funding cuts will mostly take away the detection aspect. And we will be spending more state money than we have in the past."

The Governor's Office agrees the program will continue, federal money or not.

Rhoades said Mexican drug cartels are still a concern and search-and-destroy operations are important for fostering a "good business climate" for marijuana shops in Oregon, mainly by suppressing the black market.

"But that's only one tool in the tool belt," he said. "We're going to start being smarter about this."

***

The Drug Enforcement Administration program itself has come under fire from national marijuana reform advocates.

U.S. Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., recently led a push in the House to drastically reduce the program's budget. While it didn't make it into the final budget, he said success is inevitable, given the shifting national sentiment. As California and other states legalize recreational marijuana use this year, "they should follow Oregon's example," Lieu said.

"This is one of the stupidest programs we have in the federal government," he said. "In a world of limited resources, funds would be far better spent fighting drugs like opioids. I understand why law enforcement would want a continued stream of funding from the DEA, but we can also get law enforcement to accept that funding to go somewhere else."

But the budget cuts in Oregon aren't entirely by choice. While the state requested much less this year than previous years under the program, Bishop noted that it received still less than that — $200,000 in response to a $400,000 request.

"A lot of us speculate that we're being punished, but we don't know," Bishop said. "It's total speculation. We're not hearing anything from the feds."

A spokesman with the Drug Enforcement Administration said the agency declined comment.

http://www.oregonlive.com/marijuana/index.ssf/2016/11/search-and-destroy_missions_fo.html
 

Big Sur

Member
Under state law those local tax laws become invalid in municipalities which ban some or all of the industry.

Yes, two measures were on many ballots in several counties and cities. The idea was that if the ban failed, they would tax it (or not, if the tax measure also failed).

Also the idea behind many munis opting out now is that they can flip to legalizing it in future, and the 3% local sales tax would already be voted into place. Whereas if they opt in now they cannot flip to ban it later. I doubt that any will flip later though, unless they eye all that tax revenue that they are missing out on. Sad that so many counties east of the Cascades opted out.

In California any muni can opt out of prop 64 legal rec weed, and many already have. Prop 64 also does away with medical MJ in California, so it is all rec weed there now at the commercial level. Also unlike Oregon, Munis can also ban outdoor personal grows in California. Though I think that Medford also banned all outdoor growing in this election, including home grows?
 
Last edited:

Big Sur

Member
In a nutshell, the following counties voted to ban rec weed: Baker, Jefferson, Lake, Marion, and Douglas. The following counties fell short of voting to ban rec weed: Linn and Deschutes.

So all the counties east of the Cascades have banned rec weed, except Deschutes. All the counties west of the Cascades have legalized rec weed, except Douglas and Marion.

Sad that Douglas County voted no. My ex's 100 acre ranch is a perfect place to grow weed.
 

Sluicebox

Member
Funny if the counties think they can just jump in later and reap all the rewards like they never missed a beat. There was a short window to do well at this and that is quickly closing.
 

Dr.King

Member
Veteran
Funny if the counties think they can just jump in later and reap all the rewards like they never missed a beat. There was a short window to do well at this and that is quickly closing.

Think the cannabis market prices are crashing or something? Gotta grow something special that the dispensaries are both looking for and willing to pay a good amount for.
 

Aota1

Member
I was reading some interesting stuff about this Sirius Black strain. There's a guy going as green man organics selling seed packs of it and says Sirius stole the cut from him. They won't release the genetics yet but he's selling packs and says it's something called Puppy Love X Black Rhino. I found this interesting since Sirius is blowing up on this strain along with their shatter.
 

Aota1

Member
I've tried the live resin and bho of Sirius Black and it's definitely a sour grapes kind of thing. Not typical sweet purp flavors. It's a novel strain and interesting to me but, you know. There's so many
 

Dankwolf

Active member
When i hear about sirus black strian i just get a feeling that i want nothing to do with it. Why i dont know but i trust my gut. I rember some one posting/advertising it all over icmag and every where else . marketing like that makes me lose intrest fast . if it was all that why try so hard to push it . just felt a little corprit to me if you know what i mean .
 
R

Robrites

picture.php


WHITE CITY — Huge piles of moldy marijuana in Southern Oregon are going up in smoke this fall after record rains in October took a toll on many crops.

"At first I was freaking out about how much we are losing," said Brent Kenyon, a cannabis activist who helped craft the state's rules on pot. "But I've heard a lot of really sad stories from people who lost a majority of their crops."

Kenyon estimates about 20 percent or more of his crop will be burned at his farm near White City, reports the Mail Tribune.

Overall, this will be a tough year for growers, who faced an onslaught of russet mites in the summer and then mold in the fall, Kenyon said. The mold destroys the marijuana flowers and spreads quickly, particularly after heavy rains.

Jackson County has one-third of all commercial marijuana grow sites in the state, according to the Oregon Liquor Control Commission.

Kenyon has held several bonfires using moldy marijuana stacked about 10 feet high. He likens his losses to the pears that drop on the ground in orchards throughout the valley.

"We had an acceptable loss given the circumstances," he said.

To combat these problems, Kenyon said he expects many growers turned to pesticides or fungicides, but the amount being used could likely exceed the limits allowed under state testing rules.

"I'm expecting an 80-percent fail rate as they test for pesticides," he said.

Kenyon said the new testing requirements are so vigorous they're picking up on chemicals used to spray telephone poles that drift into nearby gardens.

Kenyon, who owns The Wharf restaurant in Medford and runs various marijuana-related businesses including a consulting firm, Kenyon and Associates, said he will be pushing for higher thresholds for pesticides at the state level.

"You can buy table grapes in the store that have more pesticides than cannabis," he said.

Kenyon said the state should move quickly to allow marijuana to be sold with higher levels of pesticides but require a label that would alert the consumer until new limits can be established. He said Colorado took a similar approach.

If the state doesn't ease up on the testing requirements, Kenyon said he fears more marijuana will be sold on the black market.

The OLCC has had anecdotal information that mold has been a problem this year, but so far there is no clear answer as to how much of the retail marijuana crop was lost.

"I've heard lots of reports about mold and pot this year," said Rob Patridge, chairman of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission.

Patridge said he's aware of a push in the marijuana industry to increase pesticide limits, but he said that will have to be worked out in the Legislature.

Anthony Smith, owner of Kenevir Research Lab in Central Point and the only licensed marijuana testing facility in Jackson County, said he's seen only about a 10 percent testing failure rate, or slightly more, as growers adjust to new requirements that test for 60 pesticide or fungicide substances in marijuana.

Prior to Oct. 1, the state's rules for pesticide testing were broad, leaving labs and marijuana producers to decide which chemicals to test for.

When Smith begins testing oils extracted from cannabis in the near future, he's anticipating a higher failure rate of 60 to 80 percent.

The same extraction process that concentrates the active ingredient in marijuana also concentrates the pesticides, he said.

"The biggest public health threat in cannabis right now is pesticides in concentrates," he said.

One substance in particular he's seeing a lot of is myclobutanil, a fungicide in a popular product known as Eagle 20, which is applied to edible agricultural products including grapes, apples and spinach.

Smith said growers are going through a period where they will have to adjust from an industry that had little regulation to one that is highly regulated.

At the same time, he said the state should remove some of the substances from the testing protocol because they are rarely found in the samples.

"It just makes the list more technical to accomplish," he said.

"There are some pesticides on the list that we don't see, and it makes the testing more expensive and slower." But Smith said he doesn't think his lab is backlogged considering the amount of work that goes into each sample.

"We've gone from an unregulated testing industry that was offering 24-hour turnaround and $100 testing," Smith said. "The growers are not super happy that the turnaround is three weeks, but I do not consider that a backlog."

Despite Kenyon's losses, he's still got a lot of marijuana that is being dried and manicured, while any marijuana with mold is culled.

"Our priority is to have the cleanest medicine," he said.

One of the workers, Andy Corda, 28, a migrant worker from Transylvania in Romania, said he enjoyed the work, while showing a marijuana flower with mold that he tossed into a plastic bin.

"To be honest, it is the dream," he said.

http://www.oregonlive.com/marijuana/index.ssf/2016/11/southern_oregon_pot_growers_bu.html
 
This whole "burn your moldy weed" thing is SO wasteful and driven by ignorance. Boytritis is destroyed in the CO2 extraction process and any off flavors can be filtered out with a 0.2mm filter (thanks to GreyWolf for that bit); the nastier post-harvest aspergillus mold is also destroyed by CO2, but it's byproducts (aflatoxin) require a second processing step--but it's simple! When winterizing your oil, add activated charcoal in equal parts to your oil (just oil, not oil + ethanol) and keep it agitated for a while (12 hours to be safe). Boom. No more bad stuff.

Waste not, want not!
 
R

Robrites

Important Deadlines for OLCC Recreational Marijuana Program Applicants

Important Deadlines for OLCC Recreational Marijuana Program Applicants

Important Deadlines for OLCC Recreational Marijuana Program Applicants

The following information affects prospective Oregon Liquor Control Commission Recreational Marijuana Program processor and retail applicants.

The sale of limited marijuana retail products to consumers at Oregon Medical Marijuana Program registered dispensaries will end December 31, 2016.

Beginning January 1, 2017 recreational consumers will only be able to make legal purchases of recreational marijuana at Oregon Liquor Control Commission licensed retailers.

This affects growers, processors and dispensaries in the Oregon Health Authority OMMP that plan to continue operating in the OMMP or that are currently operating in the OMMP and plan to transition to the OLCC regulated market.

Both agencies expect a surge of applications and registrations as the end of “early start” recreational sales nears at OMMP registered dispensaries. Marijuana industry businesses that require registration or licensure should submit their application materials to the OHA or OLCC as soon as possible.

It takes the OLCC approximately 75 days to process a Recreational Marijuana license application. Within a few days of submission an application is reviewed for a completed Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that has been approved by the applicant’s local jurisdiction. If an approved LUCS was not submitted, the OLCC will contact the applicant and request to submit a LUCS. An application is not assigned for investigation until the OLCC receives an approved LUCS.

Applications must also be complete in order to be processed in a timely manner. A complete application includes not only inputting information into the online system, but completing all necessary forms by license type as well. All required forms are located on OLCC’s website. Failure to complete or submit this required information will likely further delay the processing of an application.

Before you are considered an OLCC licensee you must apply and receive a physical license for the activity you wish to engage in. An application itself does not allow you to begin producing, processing, wholesaling or selling products at a retail location.
Medical processors that plan to remain in the OMMP please refer to this notice from the OHA regarding registration requirements. Processors migrating from the OMMP to OLCC licensure need to complete an inventory transfer by December 31, 2016.
Dispensaries migrating from the OMMP to OLCC licensure may transfer any marijuana item if:
The items comply with packaging, labeling and testing rules;
The items do not exceed concentration limits for retail adult use unless the prospective licensed retailer is registering to sell medical grade products.
The inventory transfer request is reviewed and approved by OLCC prior to the applicant being licensed.

Recreational Marijuana Licensing
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top