What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

The Great Awakening

Is the Great Awakening happening?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 39.0%

  • No

    Votes: 21 51.2%

  • Not Sure

    Votes: 4 9.8%
  • Total voters
    41
H

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
0mTcSyHCNNeb.jpeg
 
Three Berries

Three Berries

Active member
Absolem said:
Perfect example of a Trump supporter who still thinks they are going to overturn the 2020 election after being bitch slapped in the courts over Trump's false election fraud claims. Even the Trump appointed judges stomped him down.

Stay in the foxhole berry. The 2020 election war is still going on in your mind. Just send Trump more money for the cause.
Click to expand...
The courts never looked at the facts, just the 'standing' for the lawsuits. Surprised you don't know that. What makes you think I would send a Billionaire some money? Not hitting the mark here.....
 
Absolem

Absolem

Active member
Three Berries said:
The courts never looked at the facts, just the 'standing' for the lawsuits. Surprised you don't know that. What makes you think I would send a Billionaire some money? Not hitting the mark here.....
Click to expand...

In order for your statement to be true. One must believe that.
A. Trump's attorney general William Barr over looked the "facts" when he claimed no "widespread" election fraud had happened.
B. Trump appointed judges withheld the "facts" to help Biden win.

Your statement is very ignorant and shows little critical thinking. The idea judges across the country stopped election fraud "facts" from being presented in court is one of the most brain dead things I've ever heard.
 
Last edited:
unclefishstick

unclefishstick

Fancy Janitor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Absolem said:
In order for your statement to be true. One must believe that.
A. Trump's attorney general William Barr over looked the "facts" when he claimed no "widespread" election fraud had happened.
B. Trump appointed judges withheld the "facts" to help Biden win.

Your statement is very ignorant and shows little critical thinking. The idea judges across the country stopped election fraud "facts" from being presented in court is one of the most brain dead things I've ever heard.
Click to expand...
that's shocking considering you read the drivel here!:)
 
Three Berries

Three Berries

Active member
Absolem said:
In order for your statement to be true. One must believe that.
A. Trump's attorney general William Barr over looked the "facts" when he claimed no "widespread" election fraud had happened.
B. Trump appointed judges withheld the "facts" to help Biden win.

Your statement is very ignorant and shows little critical thinking. The idea judges across the country stopped election fraud "facts" from being presented in court is one of the most brain dead things I've ever heard.
Click to expand...
Barr was not Trump's Attorney(s) in the court cases, besides he's a part of the show. And they NEVER looked at any evidence. It NEVER got that far. What don't you understand about a ruling on defendant Standing?

There is really nothing that can be done to fix the steal. it's all drama and will be shown how it was done before the midterms.

Your adherence to MSM info is a symptom of brain deadness.
 
buzzmobile

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
Hempy McNoodle said:
Interesting article from 2021...
Could it be true?:smoker:
Click to expand...
Interesting article from 2020...
Could it be true?
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Did the US Raid European Software Company Scytl and Seize their Servers in Germany? -- Company Refutes Claims? | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

UPDATE: Scytl reportedly refuted the claims on Saturday morning.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

While we are strolling down meme-ory lane, there are a lot of "interesting articles" below:

Blatent election fraud thread

I will post updates as they seem important, on this first post, so they don't get lost in the FUDdle. 12/23 Trump speech: https://twitter.com/i/status/1341600130504519681 Let's start with the chairman of the Federal Election Commission: The election is illegitimate...
www.icmag.com

Some call it blatant.
 
Absolem

Absolem

Active member
Three Berries said:
Barr was not Trump's Attorney(s) in the court cases, besides he's a part of the show. And they NEVER looked at any evidence. It NEVER got that far. What don't you understand about a ruling on defendant Standing?

There is really nothing that can be done to fix the steal. it's all drama and will be shown how it was done before the midterms.

Your adherence to MSM info is a symptom of brain deadness.
Click to expand...

What you call "facts" are nothing more then false/misleading claims and outright lies.

www.mtsu.edu

False Claims By Attorneys About Trump Election Result (2020-2021)

False claims by Donald Trump's attorneys about the 2020 presidential election results have prompted some experts to observe the limits of First Amendment free speech protections for attorneys who make misleading public statements.
www.mtsu.edu www.mtsu.edu
In 2020 and 2021, President Donald Trump and his attorneys launched numerous lawsuits questioning the presidential election results in a number of key states, which, if they had all been reversed, could have again given him a win in the electoral college. Although Trump continued to allege in 2021 and 2022 that the election was stolen from him, none of the more than 60 cases that Trump and his team brought resulted in overturning the results.

Attorney Rudy Giuliani conceded in a lawsuit that he was not alleging fraud as a matter of law but still had his license to practice law in New York suspended after an appellate court said he made false and misleading statements about the 2020 election.
 
Three Berries

Three Berries

Active member
Absolem said:
What you call "facts" are nothing more then false/misleading claims and outright lies.

www.mtsu.edu

False Claims By Attorneys About Trump Election Result (2020-2021)

False claims by Donald Trump's attorneys about the 2020 presidential election results have prompted some experts to observe the limits of First Amendment free speech protections for attorneys who make misleading public statements.
www.mtsu.edu www.mtsu.edu
In 2020 and 2021, President Donald Trump and his attorneys launched numerous lawsuits questioning the presidential election results in a number of key states, which, if they had all been reversed, could have again given him a win in the electoral college. Although Trump continued to allege in 2021 and 2022 that the election was stolen from him, none of the more than 60 cases that Trump and his team brought resulted in overturning the results.

Attorney Rudy Giuliani conceded in a lawsuit that he was not alleging fraud as a matter of law but still had his license to practice law in New York suspended after an appellate court said he made false and misleading statements about the 2020 election.
Click to expand...
Barr was not his attorney.. And I don't think overturning the results are the results they are looking for. Otherwise they would not have let Biden steal the election in the first place. Highlighting the fraud for all to see before the midterms as we need to have new voting rules in place.

One vote, one day, on paper.

How was it that Trump won when Hillary KNEW they had it in the bag? Now you see why they were so surprised?
 
Absolem

Absolem

Active member
Three Berries said:
Barr was not his attorney.. And I don't think overturning the results are the results they are looking for. Otherwise they would not have let Biden steal the election in the first place. Highlighting the fraud for all to see before the midterms as we need to have new voting rules in place.

One vote, one day, on paper.

How was it that Trump won when Hillary KNEW they had it in the bag? Now you see why they were so surprised?
Click to expand...

Your blithering and blathering about "voter fraud" is absolutely pointless.

There was no "widespread" voter fraud. Time to to come terms with what Billy Barr said about it.

It's like claiming a restaurant put onions in your food when they never did. Then complaining non stop how this restaurant should stop serving onions to people when they don't want any.

I know it's hard for you to comprehend how a senile old fool like Biden could beat Trump. After all Trump had huge rallies and Biden could hardly get a gathering. Trump voters are like the fans in the stands at pro sporting events who paint their faces, bring signs, and yell loudly. They seem like there are many but really they are out numbered.

People wanted a fool over an asshole.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top