Thinking '2nd AVE Deli' I'll be in Manhattan at lunchtime
Thinking '2nd AVE Deli' I'll be in Manhattan at lunchtime
is that Stimpy in front? how CUTE...
We've got some good pastrami here in California, might be a little out of your way, but well worth it!
Absolutely! Long before Trump entered politics. I realized that the military is the one and ONLY hope to stop such an entrenched conspiracy. I just figured that that would never happen. I did pray though.
And, here we are now...
I could be wrong, but I think it counts views by the device doing the viewing and counts each device just once. I dunno. Even if it's just 14 people, it is still my great pleasure to post here with you all. One candle can light many candles.
NO COMPETITION! Nothing like New York pastrami on rye. The closest runner up is Montreal, then Toronto....next you're gonna say California has good pizza
you may know better; i know that i don't know; maybe Unc knows.
Do you really pray?
I'll be in NYC on Tuesday,any recommendations on a deli for a pastrami sannngwichhh
garden is looking good hempy!
Thanks for sharing this.^ I have long figured that George HW Bush was behind the attempted assassination of Reagan. You just sent me into a little 'rabbit hole' and here is just a little of what I dug up...
https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/13/...e-court-i-am-the-cause-of-john-s-tragedy.html
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1981/0...ckley-Sr-the-father-of-the-man/2618354862800/
https://www.nytimes.com/1981/04/04/...any is the Vanderbilt,over-the-counter market.
https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2004/6/9/32836/-
https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2016/oct/19/john-hinckley-srs-fbi-file/
The dailykos and muckrock are particularly interesting.
Could share with us which post it was you found to be of value?
Could share with us which post it was you found to be of value?
No. No. You've once again mischaracterized or misunderstood what I've said. And, you also seem unaware of multiple contradictions in things you've been saying.
Example: You just mischaracterized my reasoning for bringing up Galileo by saying that he"failed to convince the church." That is not why I mentioned Galileo, or 'Gal,' as you refer to him. I brought up Galileo's triumph over 'flat-earthers' who also thought that the earth was the center of the universe (or, what we now understand to be our solar system) and were essentially the 'scientific consensus of the time and place.