MJtheIndicator
Member
The issue isn't with the genius of Lifeson, the trio comparison in the context of rhythm sections Mitch/Noel vs. Neil/Geddy isn't so on point, we could debate whether or not Jimi laid back as much as Alex, but its obvious Hendrix was driving everyone else. A more contextual comparison of rhythm section would be Jack Bruce/Ginger Baker. For me this is where it gets tricky, who's drving that trio? I want to say Ginger, but deep down I know there is an equal playing field.
As much as it pains me to admit... I feel Alex Lifeson is the weakest musician in Rush and I apoligize for my opinion, I know its not nice to say of Alex Lifeson, but as weak links go at least he's better than Noel Redding on his instrument. Besides, who is frothing to learn Lifeson solos in 2015, when its the trademark Rush interplay and counterpoint thats more fun to replicate (its prog rock c'mon). For me Rush is about the passages, the parts case in point YYZ - it was written without Alex. Listen to it with that in mind and you will hear the melodic guitar as almost an afterthought. The bridge flurries are weak and the solo borders on pretentious McLaughlin nonsense, I can't think of an aloof calculated solo from Jimi off hand.
As much as it pains me to admit... I feel Alex Lifeson is the weakest musician in Rush and I apoligize for my opinion, I know its not nice to say of Alex Lifeson, but as weak links go at least he's better than Noel Redding on his instrument. Besides, who is frothing to learn Lifeson solos in 2015, when its the trademark Rush interplay and counterpoint thats more fun to replicate (its prog rock c'mon). For me Rush is about the passages, the parts case in point YYZ - it was written without Alex. Listen to it with that in mind and you will hear the melodic guitar as almost an afterthought. The bridge flurries are weak and the solo borders on pretentious McLaughlin nonsense, I can't think of an aloof calculated solo from Jimi off hand.