My dogs got no nuts. I gotta pig you could try it on.
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
The 2020 Presidential Election
- Thread starter Zeez
- Start date
- Status
My dogs got no nuts. I gotta pig you could try it on.
Med4u is h.h's dog?!
You can learn something every day here at IC.
You can learn something every day here at IC.
Joe Biden Suggests Making Michelle Obama Running Mate
Joe Biden Suggests Making Michelle Obama Running Mate
Joe Biden Suggests Making Michelle Obama Running Mate, Appointing Barack to Supreme Court
Joe Biden suggested on Tuesday that the Obamas would be appointed to high office if he were elected in 2020, telling voters the former first lady could be his running mate, while her husband was destined for the Supreme Court, provided he wanted the appointment.
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elec...ning-mate-appointing-barack-to-supreme-court/
Joe Biden Suggests Making Michelle Obama Running Mate
Joe Biden Suggests Making Michelle Obama Running Mate, Appointing Barack to Supreme Court
Joe Biden suggested on Tuesday that the Obamas would be appointed to high office if he were elected in 2020, telling voters the former first lady could be his running mate, while her husband was destined for the Supreme Court, provided he wanted the appointment.
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elec...ning-mate-appointing-barack-to-supreme-court/
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
I doubt that Michelle will want to get wrapped up in Quid Pro Joe's messes.
not sure i follow...are you inferring that you would like to lick my nuts?...what would your boyfriend think ?
Goodbye. You had nothing to add anyway.
Trump administration ‘rolling back women’s rights by 50 years’ by changing definitions of domestic violence and sexual assault
The Trump administration quietly changed the definition of both domestic violence and sexual assault back in April but the move has only just surfaced. The change could have significant repercussions for millions of victims of gender-based violence. The Trump Justice Department’s definition only considers physical harm that constitutes a felony or misdemeanor to be domestic violence – meaning other forms of domestic violence such as psychological abuse, coercive control and manipulation no longer fall under the department’s definition.
Under the Obama administration, the definition was drastically more expansive and was assessed by domestic violence organizations.
The Trump administration quietly changed the definition of both domestic violence and sexual assault back in April but the move has only just surfaced. The change could have significant repercussions for millions of victims of gender-based violence. The Trump Justice Department’s definition only considers physical harm that constitutes a felony or misdemeanor to be domestic violence – meaning other forms of domestic violence such as psychological abuse, coercive control and manipulation no longer fall under the department’s definition.
Under the Obama administration, the definition was drastically more expansive and was assessed by domestic violence organizations.
Really?
Was the wind blowing??
C
Capra ibex
Donny changing the laws on the quiet in case people find out what dastardly deeds he committed in the past??
Maybe downgrading the severity of 'pussy grabbing'?
Last edited:
at the moment the senate is building towards a witness vote
interesting situation, actual removal of trump looks implausible
squashing witnesses doesn't look good, just not a trial without witnesses
calling witnesses? probably worse - nothing good will be revealed, could be a nightmare
the good/bad thing is of course all about the senators, the goal is no senator is harmed during the process
which way will it go? the clock is ticking
interesting situation, actual removal of trump looks implausible
squashing witnesses doesn't look good, just not a trial without witnesses
calling witnesses? probably worse - nothing good will be revealed, could be a nightmare
the good/bad thing is of course all about the senators, the goal is no senator is harmed during the process
which way will it go? the clock is ticking
Jared should testify.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/30/tru...cretive-kushner-meeting-in-china-in-2017.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/30/tru...cretive-kushner-meeting-in-china-in-2017.html
I told y'all it wasn't gonna be fair...
A partisan inpeachment can never be fair....it grinds against the constitution itself...if you go against our constitution..you will loose every time...regardless of argument
Dont take it from me...watch the trial
TRUMP 2020 in a massive blowout
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
an impeachment is always partisanI told y'all it wasn't gonna be fair...
A partisan inpeachment can never be fair....it grinds against the constitution itself...if you go against our constitution..you will loose every time...regardless of argument
Dont take it from me...watch the trial
TRUMP 2020 in a massive blowout
that's how it's setup by design
what it's about now is where will the damage be?
time will tell
When Partisanship is the most important fact the whole impeachment process is null and void. Some of the crap Ive herd from Alan Dershowitz the guys a nut job.
Exactly wrong...impeachment is a tool to get rid of a prez that everybody says he fucked up...it simply wont work on partisan only grounds..it will look or be one party trying to oust a president of the other side...it must be something overwhelmingly bad that everyone in the country agrees is egregious to the country..regardless of party
That's why the bar is set so high for such a remedy....if it falls short you must let the peoples vote to remedy in the next election...hence a 4 yr limit...to use it as a political hit job
Lowers the standard of what is impeachable ..then you have a precedent of a low bar for impeachment and every president from this moment forward will be impeached just cuz hes the opposite party....PBS is covering the trial and this question right this min....
you're telling me how it should be, sounds fine as far as it goes
impeachment is political, that's how it's framed in the constitution
and political --> partisan, that's just how the real world of politics is
all impeachments that have taken place at the presidential level have been politically driven
that's the history
St. Phatty
Active member
- Status
